Surface installations intended for Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Atypical accident scenarios and their identification |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Chimica e dei Materiali, via Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy;2. SINTEF Technology and Society, Safety Research, S. P. Andersens veg 5, 7031 Trondheim, Norway;3. Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL), Major Hazards, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, United Kingdom;1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden;2. Center for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500 032, India;3. PRISMA Cluster of Excellence, Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany;1. Coordinación de Epidemiología Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México;2. Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México;3. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México;1. Division of Computational Mathematics and Engineering, Institute for Computational Science, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam;2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam;3. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China;4. Center for System Reliability & Safety, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China;5. School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia |
| |
| Abstract: | With the advent of Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technology the extent of CO2 handling is set to increase dramatically. However, lack of substantial operational experience in such a novel process can lead to significant difficulties in identifying the associated hazards. This field may be characterized by atypical accident scenarios, i.e. scenarios not captured by common HAZard IDentification (HAZID) techniques because of omissions, errors or lack of knowledge. Recent atypical events evidence that consequences may exceed by far those of worst-case reference scenarios. Identification of atypical scenarios related to CCS is a challenge, considering also the public concern that this technology raises. This study focuses on new and emerging technologies of carbon capture and transport. A HAZID analysis was carried out by means of two different approaches (‘top-down’ and ‘DyPASI’). This allowed not only for a double check of results, but also for the comparative assessment of the methodologies and of their applicability. A general overview of the accident scenarios related to these technologies was given. No absolute showstoppers were found. Rather, a number of potential hazards were identified which will require the adoption of safe design principles to eliminate, prevent, control or mitigate them. Some possible safety barriers required for implementation were identified as a starting point in this process. |
| |
| Keywords: | CCS HAZID Atypical scenarios DyPASI Top-down approach |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
