| 大气二氧化硫两种分析方法对测定结果的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曹颖,赵文洪.大气二氧化硫两种分析方法对测定结果的影响[J].环境监测管理与技术,1996,8(5):37-38. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曹颖 赵文洪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 泰安市环境监测站 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对甲醛缓冲溶液吸收－盐酸副玫瑰胺测定大气中ＳＯ２的两种分析方法进行了对比实验表明，由于实验条件和试剂浓度不同，造成测定结果有一定差异，（空气和废气监测分析方法）法略高于（环境监测技术规范）法。
|
| 关 键 词： | SO2 甲醛缓冲溶液 吸收 大气监测 盐酸副玫瑰胺 |
Influences of Two Analytical Methods on Assay REsult of Atmospheric SO 2 |
| |
| Cao,Ying,Zhao Wenhong,Jiang Yongdong.Influences of Two Analytical Methods on Assay REsult of Atmospheric SO 2[J].The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring,1996,8(5):37-38. |
| |
| Authors: | Cao Ying Zhao Wenhong Jiang Yongdong |
| |
| Institution: | Cao Ying Zhao Wenhong Jiang Yongdong |
| |
| Abstract: | The monitoring results,collected by Xingtai Environmental Monitoring Station in the recent decode, are used to assess the environmental quality of underground water and analyse the dynamic tendency. The main assessment approaches include monofactorial ratio,external reasoning and rectilinear regression methods. |
| |
| Keywords: | Underground water Aquatic environment quality Dynamic Forecast |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
