首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

加拿大一枝黄花和小飞蓬叶浸提液对大豆幼苗生长的复合化感效应
引用本文:刘君,周嘉伟,肖鸿光,王从彦. 加拿大一枝黄花和小飞蓬叶浸提液对大豆幼苗生长的复合化感效应[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(4): 239-244. DOI: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20151226002
作者姓名:刘君  周嘉伟  肖鸿光  王从彦
作者单位:江苏大学环境生态研究所,环境与安全工程学院,镇江212013
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31300343);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20130500);江苏省高校自然科学研究项目(13KJB610002);江苏大学高级专业人才科研启动基金(12JDG086)
摘    要:加拿大一枝黄花(Solidago canadensis)和小飞蓬(Conyza canadensis)常共同入侵至同一农田生态系统。探究了两者对大豆幼苗生长的复合化感作用。加拿大一枝黄花叶浸提液显著抑制大豆幼苗地上生物量。而小飞蓬叶浸提液也明显抑制大豆幼苗地上生物量(未达到显著水平)。与对照处理相比,两者复合叶浸提液处理未显著影响大豆幼苗地上生物量。两者复合叶浸提液处理下大豆幼苗地上生物量显著大于加拿大一枝黄花叶浸提液单一处理,同时也大于小飞蓬叶浸提液单一处理(未达到显著水平)。两者叶浸提液单一处理均明显降低大豆幼苗株高(未达到显著水平)。与对照处理相比,两者复合叶浸提液处理未显著影响大豆幼苗株高。两者复合叶浸提液处理下大豆幼苗株高明显大于两者叶浸提液单一处理(未达到显著水平)。因此,两者叶浸提液对大豆幼苗的生长均具有一定程度的抑制效应,且加拿大一枝黄花叶浸提液对大豆幼苗产生的化感作用(尤其是地上生物量)明显大于小飞蓬。两者复合化感作用明显低于两者单一化感作用,尤其是两者对大豆幼苗地上生物量的复合化感作用显著低于加拿大一枝黄花的单一化感作用。所以,化感效应可能在两者共同入侵(即两者复合作用)进程中所起的贡献低于在两者单一入侵进程中所起的作用。

关 键 词:加拿大一枝黄花  小飞蓬  大豆  化感作用  幼苗生长
收稿时间:2015-12-26
修稿时间:2016-03-14

Synergistic Allelopathic Effects of Solidago canadensis and Conyza canadensis on Seedling Growth of Glycine max
Liu Jun,Zhou Jiawei,Xiao Hongguang,Wang Congyan. Synergistic Allelopathic Effects of Solidago canadensis and Conyza canadensis on Seedling Growth of Glycine max[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2016, 11(4): 239-244. DOI: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20151226002
Authors:Liu Jun  Zhou Jiawei  Xiao Hongguang  Wang Congyan
Affiliation:Institute of Environment and Ecology, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
Abstract:The co-invasion of Solidago canadensis and Conyza canadensis may occur in the same agricultural ecosystem usually. This study aims to determine the synergistic allelopathic effects of the two species on seedling growth of Glycine max. Results showed that single leaf extracts of S. canadensis significantly reduced the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling. Single leaf extracts of C. canadensis also reduced the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling obviously but did not reach the significant level. The mixed leaf extracts of the two species did not affect the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling significantly compared with the control. The aboveground biomass of G. max seedling under the mixed leaf extracts of the two species was significantly higher than that under single leaf extracts of S. canadensis but close to that under single leaf extracts of C. canadensis. Single leaf extracts of the two species all reduced the height of G. max seedling but the change was not significant. The mixed leaf extracts of the two species did not affect the height of G. max seedling significantly compared with the control. The height of G. max seedling under the mixed leaf extracts of the two species was higher than that under single leaf extracts of the two species although not at significant level. Thus, the leaf extracts of the two species exhibit allelopathic effects on seedling growth of Glycine max, and S. canadensis triggered more allelopathic effects on seedling growth of Glycine max than C. canadensis. Meanwhile, the allelopathic effect of the mixed leaf extracts of the two species was lower than that of single leaf extracts of the two species. Especially, the effect of the mixed leaf extracts of the two species on the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling was significantly lower than that of single leaf extracts of S. canadensis. Thus, the allelopathic effects of S. canadensis and C. canadensis on the growth of native seedling might play a more important role in their single invasion process than in their co-invasion process.
Keywords:Solidago canadensis   Conyza canadensis   Glycine max   allelopathic effects   seedling growth
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态毒理学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态毒理学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号