Elevated atmospheric CO2 and drought effects on leaf gas exchange properties of barley |
| |
Authors: | Gerard W. Wall Richard L. GarciaFrank Wechsung Bruce A. Kimball |
| |
Affiliation: | a U.S. Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, 21881 North Cardon Lane, Maricopa, AZ 85238, USA b LI-COR BioScience Inc., P.O. Box 4425, Lincoln, NE 68504, USA c Potsdam-Institute for Climate Impact Research, P.O. Box 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Atmospheric CO2 concentration (Ca) is rising, predicted to cause global warming, and alter precipitation patterns. During 1994, spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Alexis) was grown in a strip-split-plot experimental design to determine the effects that the main plot Ca treatments [A: Ambient at 370 μmol (CO2) mol−1; E: Enriched with free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) at ∼550 μmol (CO2) mol−1] had on several gas exchange properties of fully expanded sunlit primary leaves. The interacting strip-split-plot irrigation treatments were Dry or Wet [50% (D) or 100% (W) replacement of potential evapotranspiration] at ample nitrogen (261 kg N ha−1) and phosphorous (29 kg P ha−1) fertility. Elevated Ca facilitated drought avoidance by reducing stomatal conductance (gs) by 34% that conserved water and enabled stomata to remain open for a longer period into a drought. This resulted in a 28% reduction in drought-induced midafternoon depression in net assimilation rate (A). Elevated Ca increased A by 37% under Dry and 23% under Wet. Any reduction in A under Wet conditions occurred because of nonstomatal limitations, whereas under Dry it occurred because of stomatal limitations. Elevated Ca increased the diurnal integral of A (A′) that resulted in an increase in the seasonal-long integral of A′ (A″) for barley leaves by 12% (P = 0.14) under both Dry and Wet - 650, 730, 905 and 1020 ± 65 g (C) m−2 y−1 for AD, ED, AW and EW treatments, respectively. Elevated Ca increased season-long average dry weight (DWS; crown, shoots) by 14% (P = 0.02), whereas deficit irrigation reduced DWS by 7% (P = 0.06), although these values may have been affected by a short but severe pea aphid [Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)] infestation. Hence, an elevated-Ca-based improvement in gas exchange properties enhanced growth of a barley crop. |
| |
Keywords: | A, Ambient Ca treatment A, instantaneous leaf net assimilation rate [μmol (CO2) m&minus 2 s&minus 1] Amax, daily maximum leaf net assimilation rate [μmol (CO2) m&minus 2 s&minus 1] AN, season-long relative mean leaf net assimilation rate normalized between 0 and 1 scale (i.e., AN = A/Amax, dimensionless) A&prime , daily integral of net leaf carbon accumulation [g (C) m&minus 2 d&minus 1] A&Prime , seasonal integral of net leaf carbon accumulation [g (C) m&minus 2 y&minus 1] AD, Ambient-Dry treatment ANOVA, analysis of variance effects (i.e., C, D, I, S, T) AW, Ambient-Wet treatment df1, first degrees of freedom for F-statistic df2, second degrees of freedom for F-statistic C, carbon dioxide effect in ANOVA Ca, atmospheric CO2 concentration [μmol (CO2) mol&minus 1] Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration [μmol (CO2) mol&minus 1] Ci/Ca, ratio of Ci to Ca (dimensionless) D, Dry irrigation treatment D, soil dehydration cycle effect in ANOVA DAE, day after 50% emergence DWG, dry weight of grain for barley (g plant&minus 1) DWS, dry weight of shoot and crown tissue for barley (g plant&minus 1) DWS,B:W, percentage change in dry weight between barley and wheat (%) DWS,W, dry weight of shoot and crown tissue for wheat (g plant&minus 1) E, Enriched Ca treatment E, leaf transpiration rate [mmol (H2O) m&minus 2 s&minus 1] ED, Enriched-Dry treatment EW, Enriched-Wet treatment ea, atmospheric water vapor pressure at Ta (Pa) e*, atmospheric saturation water vapor pressure at Ta (Pa) ea,VPD, atmospheric water vapor pressure deficit (i.e., ea,VPD = e* &minus ea) at Ta (Pa) F, F-statistic FACE, free-air-CO2-enrichment gs, stomatal conductance to water vapor [mol (H2O) m&minus 2 s&minus 1] I, irrigation effect in ANOVA IWUE (A/gs), intrinsic water use efficiency [μmol (CO2) mol (H2O)&minus 1] PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density [μmol (photons) m&minus 2 s&minus 1] Pα, probability of a greater F-statistic by chance S, species effect in ANOVA comparing average season-long dry weight response of barley to wheat SR, daily total global solar radiation (MJ m&minus 2 d&minus 1) SRi, instantaneous total global solar radiation (MJ m&minus 2 h&minus 1) T, time of day [midmorning (MM: 2.5 h prior to solar noon), midday (MD: solar noon), and midafternoon (MA: 2.5 h after solar noon)] effect in ANOVA TDR, time domain reflectometry Ta, ambient air temperature inside cuvette (° C) Tl, leaf temperature inside cuvette (° C) Ta,max, maximum Ta (° C) Ta,min, minimum Ta (° C) TS, soil temperature (° C) TS,max, maximum TS (° C) TS,min, minimum TS (° C) ΔT, leaf minus air temperature inside cuvette (° C) ua,avg, average annual daily wind speed (m s&minus 1) at 2-m height W, Wet irrigation treatment WUE (A/E), water use efficiency [μmol (CO2) mmol (H2O)&minus 1] ΨM, soil matric potential (MPa) θS, volumetric soil-water content (m3 m&minus 3) |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|