规划环境影响评价中公众参与方法实践与探讨

规划环评是我国环评领域的一个新方向，公众参与是规划环评中的一个重要组成部分。从实践出发，以浙江省2010年电力发展规划及2020年展望的能源类规划环评为案例，对专项规划环评的公众参与作了初步探讨。并提出了提高专项规划环境影响评价公众参与有效性的建议。     

输变电建设项目环境影响评价的认识与实践

结合输变电环境影响评价工作实践，从输变电环评的法律、法规出发，阐述了输变电环评工作的重点内容，在此基础上论述了输变电建设项目环评中应执行的法律、法规、产业政策与清洁生产、规划相符性、环境功能区划、公众参与等“6＋2”原则，并结合实践进行了分析，提出了输变电建设项目环境影响评价中应注意的环境保护目标、公众参与等主要问题。     

输变电工程电磁环境公众参与及环保对策探讨

以广州市部分变电站环境影响评价及其审批过程中的公众参与为例,归纳公众对输变电工程在电磁环境方面的感受和利益相关方的观点,并从科普宣传、确保达标、建立风险沟通机制、加强科研、改善公众交流策略等方面提出了环保对策。     

浅谈环境影响评价中的公众参与

环评中实行公众参与不仅是环评本身的需要，同时也是现阶段我国民主制度的体现。对环评中公众参与的产生、发展、与可持续发展的关系、国内外公众参与的现状、国内环评中公众参与存在的问题进行了探讨，并对环评中实行公众参与提出了几点建议。     

建设项目竣工环保验收中公众参与的探讨

建设项目竣工环境保护验收是我国环境保护管理的重要手段。阐述了建设项目竣工环境保护验收中公众参与的法律和制度基础，竣工环保验收中公众参与不仅能维护公众的环境权益，为竣工环保验收“三同时”制度的执行提供可靠依据，还可以推动环保行政主管部门决策的民主化、科学化。研究了竣工环保验收中公众意见调查的现状及存在的问题，提出加强和规范建设项目竣工环保验收公众参与的建议。     

“共生式”行动者网络视域下公众参与环境治理PPP项目综述研究

环境治理PPP项目呈蓬勃发展态势,公众作为环境治理受益者,由于缺乏价值导向和良好反馈制约环境多元化治理。从国内外学者对公众参与环境治理PPP项目治理关系和治理行为出发,结合行动者网络与共生理论,论证“共生式”行动者网络视域下公众参与环境治理PPP项目研究的必要性与价值性,最终为公众广泛参与以实现人类与环境的共生发展奠定基础。     

输变电环境影响评价及竣工环保验收相关要点分析

通过输变电环境影响评价及竣工环保验收工作的实践,从输变电环境影响评价及竣工环保验收的基本概念和相关法律、法规出发,分析了输变电环境影响评价及竣工环保验收工作的要点,包括敏感目标调查、生态环境影响评价与监测、声环境评价重点、公众参与等,在此基础上论述了两者之间的相互关系,最后针对输变电环境影响评价及竣工环保验收工作更加科学化提出了建议。     

基于二手书交易平台校园纸质垃圾回收利用研究

随着当代经济的快速发展,纸质垃圾分类在生活中也愈发重要。在大学校园内,多数可回收纸质垃圾未能实现重复利用。针对此类现状,选择在校园内放置纸质垃圾回收箱,并创建关于二手书交易的公众号平台,以线上线下的方式普及纸质垃圾分类的相关知识。完备的线下回收体系和公众号的运营相辅相成,促进了校园纸质垃圾的高效回收和利用。     

嘉兴市电子废弃物回收体系公众调查与完善建议

嘉兴市地处长三角中心地带,是浙江电子废弃物的重要集散地之一。通过公众调查发现,嘉兴市电子废弃物产生量比较大,而现有电子废弃物回收体系主要是民间个体回收,公众对这种回收渠道的危害后果认知不足,从而造成正规回收渠道的回收困局。因此,应该借鉴浙江永康再生资源回收体系建设的经验,对个体户回收进行改造,并加强公众环保教育,建立合理责任承担机制,从而建设一套高效、环保和健康的电子废弃物回收体系。     

亚行电力项目的环境影响评价分析

本文通过亚行贷款的河南综合综合电力项目环境影响评价的工作过程，指出火电建设项目的环境影响评价应贯穿于项目建设的各个方面及各个阶段，即项目筹备、厂址选择、工程设备、施工期，运行期等各个方面的周围物理资源、生态资源、人类使用价值、生活质量等环境问题的影响。     

电磁类建设项目环境管理现状、辐射问题及对策探讨

介绍了我国电磁类建设项目环境管理现状,探讨了电磁环境管理中存在的问题。在此基础上提出了电磁环境管理的相关建议,即加强法规标准建设、积极推进规划环评、严格规范公众参与、加强监测及申报登记工作等。     

废旧物资回收站常见事故与治安风险研究

对废旧物资回收站常见安全事故与治安风险进行了综述,从再生资源行业特殊性角度,分析了安全事故和治安事件多发的原因,并提出相关对策。提升再生资源回收网点的建设水平,不仅要改变其脏乱差的面貌,更要从经营和治安两方面,从本质上提升其安全水平,使其更好地为经济社会发展服务。     

Social aspects of public waste management in Switzerland

It is becoming increasingly evident that a waste management program, and especially a waste treatment technique, which ignores social aspects, is doomed to failure. Aspects concerning the problems of public acceptance, public participation in planning and implementation, consumer behaviour and changing value systems are no less important than the technical or economic aspects in waste management research and decision-making. As part of the Integrated Research Project “Waste”, Swiss Priority Program Environment (SPPE) 1996–1999 (funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation), this sub-project focuses on the results from two main areas. 1. Results of the three-round written Delphi-Expertquestioning “Contributions to the development of waste management in Switzerland” show that decision transparency, interregional cooperation, information policy and public participation are important factors with regard to the public acceptance of waste management in Switzerland. 2. The much discussed problem area of public acceptance of waste policies is directly linked to the concept of Social Compatibility, which is identified as an essential component of sustainable and successful waste management. As an additional aspect, the significance of mediation as a participatory process for public acceptance will be investigated. Public dialogues on concrete waste management projects not accepted by parts of the population, will therefore be initiated, monitored and evaluated.     

Communication at inactive hazardous waste sites

The remediation of inactive hazardous waste sites frequently involves a protracted negotiation with the respective state or federal agency and the entity responsible for creating the site and paying the costs. At orphaned sites, decisions are made almost exclusively by agency staff. Most of remedial decisions are made with little input or participation by the interested public. The public usually receives information in a highly technical and difficult-to-understand format after decisions are made. This ineffective form of communication can lead to mistrust and delays or changes in the remediation process. Effective public participation requires multidirectional modes of communication that provide for active and full involvement by all interested parties. At the present time, most agencies pay minimal attention to the needs of the interested public, often leaving area residents suspicious and dissatisfied with the overall program. There is an opportunity to significantly improve the public participation component of the federal Super-fund program through reauthorization. Subtle changes in the program can result in a significant increase of the public's sense of participation and overall satisfaction.