The impact of wood stove technology upgrades on indoor residential air quality

Fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) air pollution has been linked to adverse health impacts, and combustion sources including residential wood-burning may play an important role in some regions. Recent evidence suggests that indoor air quality may improve in homes where older, non-certified wood stoves are exchanged for lower emissions EPA-certified alternatives. As part of a wood stove exchange program in northern British Columbia, Canada, we sampled outdoor and indoor air at 15 homes during 6-day sampling sessions both before and after non-certified wood stoves were exchanged. During each sampling session two consecutive 3-day PM_2.5 samples were collected onto Teflon filters, which were weighed and analyzed for the wood smoke tracer levoglucosan. Residential PM_2.5 infiltration efficiencies (F_inf) were estimated from continuous light scattering measurements made with nephelometers, and estimates of F_inf were used to calculate the outdoor- and indoor-generated contributions to indoor air. There was not a consistent relationship between stove technology and outdoor or indoor concentrations of PM_2.5 or levoglucosan. Mean F_inf estimates were low and similar during pre- and post-exchange periods (0.32 ± 0.17 and 0.33 ± 0.17, respectively). Indoor sources contributed the majority (～65%) of the indoor PM_2.5 concentrations, independent of stove technology, although low indoor-outdoor levoglucosan ratios (median ≤ 0.19) and low indoor PM_2.5-levoglucosan correlations (r ≤ 0.19) suggested that wood smoke was not a major indoor PM_2.5 source in most of these homes. In summary, despite the potential for extensive wood stove exchange programs to reduce outdoor PM_2.5 concentrations in wood smoke-impacted communities, we did not find a consistent relationship between stove technology upgrades and indoor air quality improvements in homes where stoves were exchanged.     

Investigation of PM2.5 and carbon dioxide levels in urban homes

PM_2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm) samples were collected in the indoor environments of 15 urban homes and their adjacent outdoor environments in Alexandria, Egypt, during the spring time. Indoor and outdoor carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels were also measured concurrently. The results showed that indoor and outdoor PM_2.5 concentrations in the 15 sites, with daily averages of 45.5 ± 11.1 and 47.3 ± 12.9 µg/m³, respectively, were significantly higher than the ambient 24-hr PM_2.5 standard of 35 µg/m³ recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The indoor PM_2.5 and CO₂ levels were correlated with the corresponding outdoor levels, demonstrating that outdoor convection and infiltration could lead to direct transportation indoors. Ventilation rates were also measured in the selected residences and ranged from 1.6 to 4.5 hr^?1 with median value of 3.3 hr^?1. The indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios of the monitored homes varied from 0.73 to 1.65 with average value of 0.99 ± 0.26 for PM_2.5, whereas those for CO₂ ranged from 1.13 to 1.66 with average value of 1.41 ± 0.15. Indoor sources and personal activities, including smoking and cooking, were found to significantly influence indoor levels.

Implications: Few studies on indoor air quality were carried out in Egypt, and the scarce data resulted from such studies do not allow accurate assessment of the current situation to take necessary preventive actions. The current research investigates indoor levels of PM_2.5 and CO₂ in a number of homes located in the city of Alexandria as well as the potential contribution from both indoor and outdoor sources. The study draws attention of policymakers to the importance of the establishment of national indoor air quality standards to protect human health and control air pollution in different indoor environments.     

Indoor particulate matter in urban residences of Alexandria,Egypt

Indoor particulate matter samples were collected in 17 homes in an urban area in Alexandria during the summer season. During air measurement in all selected homes, parallel outdoor air samples were taken in the balconies of the domestic residences. It was found that the mean indoor PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 and ≤10 μm, respectively) concentrations were 53.5 ± 15.2 and 77.2 ± 15.1 µg/m³, respectively. The corresponding mean outdoor levels were 66.2 ± 16.5 and 123.8 ± 32.1 µg/m³, respectively. PM_2.5 concentrations accounted, on average, for 68.8 ± 12.8% of the total PM₁₀ concentrations indoors, whereas PM_2.5 contributed to 53.7 ± 4.9% of the total outdoor PM₁₀ concentrations. The median indoor/outdoor mass concentration (I/O) ratios were 0.81 (range: 0.43–1.45) and 0.65 (range: 0.4–1.07) for PM_2.5 and PM₁₀, respectively. Only four homes were found with I/O ratios above 1, indicating significant contribution from indoor sources. Poor correlation was seen between the indoor PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 levels and the corresponding outdoor concentrations. PM₁₀ levels were significantly correlated with PM_2.5 loadings indoors and outdoors and this might be related to PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 originating from similar particulate matter emission sources. Smoking, cooking using gas stoves, and cleaning were the major indoor sources contributed to elevated indoor levels of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5.

Implications: The current study presents results of the first PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ study in homes located in the city of Alexandria, Egypt. Scarce data are available on indoor air quality in Egypt. Poor correlation was seen between the indoor and outdoor particulate matter concentrations. Indoor sources such as smoking, cooking, and cleaning were found to be the major contributors to elevated indoor levels of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5.     

Characterization of Indoor Particle Sources Using Continuous Mass and Size Monitors

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive indoor particle characterization study was conducted in nine Boston-area homes in 1998 in order to characterize sources of PM in indoor environments. State-of-the-art sampling methodologies were used to obtain continuous PM_2.5 concentration and size distribution particulate data for both indoor and outdoor air. Study homes, five of which were sampled during two seasons, were monitored over week-long periods. Among other data collected during the extensive monitoring efforts were 24hr elemental/organic carbon (EC/OC) particulate data as well as semi-continuous air exchange rates and time-activity information.

This rich data set shows that indoor particle events tend to be brief, intermittent, and highly variable, thus requiring the use of continuous instrumentation for their characterization. In addition to dramatically increasing indoor PM₂₅ concentrations, these data demonstrate that indoor particle events can significantly alter the size distribution and composition of indoor particles. Source event data demonstrate that the impacts of indoor activities are especially pronounced in the ultrafine (d_a < 0.1 um) and coarse (2.5 < d_a < 10 |um) modes. Among the sources of ultrafine particles characterized in this study are indoor ozone/terpene reactions. Furthermore, EC/OC data suggest that organic carbon is a major constituent of particles emitted during indoor source events. Whether exposures to indoor-generated particles, particularly from large short-term peak events, may be associated with adverse health effects will become clearer when biological mechanisms are better known.     

Effect of Gas and Kerosene Space Heaters on Indoor Air Quality: A Study in Homes of Santiago,Chile

Abstract

The impact of outdoor and indoor pollution sources on indoor air quality in Santiago, Chile was investigated. Toward this end, 16 homes were sampled in four sessions. Each session included an outdoor site and four homes using different unvented space heaters (electric or central heating, compressed natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and kerosene). Average outdoor fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) concentrations were very high (55.9 μg·m^-3), and a large fraction of these particles penetrated indoors. PM_2.5 and several PM_2.5 components (including sulfate, elemental carbon, organic carbon, metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) were elevated in homes using kerosene heaters. Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) and ultrafine particles (UFPs) were higher in homes with combustion heaters as compared with those with electric heaters or central heating. A regression model was used to assess the effect of heater use on continuous indoor PM_2.5 concentrations when windows were closed. The model found an impact only for kerosene heaters (45.8 μg m^-3).     

Outdoor and indoor factors influencing particulate matter and carbon dioxide levels in naturally ventilated urban homes

ABSTRACT

The present study investigated indoor and outdoor concentrations of two particulate matter size fractions (PM₁₀ and PM_2.5) and CO₂ in 20 urban homes ventilated naturally and located in one congested residential and commercial area in the city of Alexandria, Egypt. The results indicate that the daily mean PM_2.5 concentrations measured in the ambient air, living rooms, and kitchens of all sampling sites exceeded the WHO guideline by 100%, 65%, and 95%, respectively. The daily mean outdoor and indoor PM₁₀ levels in all sampling sites were found to exceed the WHO guideline by 100% and 80%, respectively. The indoor PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 concentrations were significantly correlated with their corresponding outdoor levels, as natural ventilation through opening doors and windows allowed direct transfer of outdoor airborne particles into the indoor air. Most of the kitchens investigated had higher indoor concentrations of PM_2.5 and CO₂ than in living rooms. The elevated levels of PM_2.5 and CO₂ in domestic kitchens were probably related to inadequate ventilation. The current study attempted to understand the sources and the various indoor and outdoor factors that affect indoor PM₁₀, PM_2.5 and CO₂ concentrations. Several domestic activities, such as smoking, cooking, and cleaning, were found to constitute important sources of indoor air pollution. The indoor pollution caused by PM_2.5 was also found to be more serious in the domestic kitchens than in the living rooms and the results suggest that exposure to PM_2.5 is high and highlights the need for more effective control measures.

Implications: Indoor air pollution is a complex problem that involves many determinant factors. Understanding the relationships and the influence of various indoor and outdoor factors on indoor air quality is very important to prioritize control measures and mitigation action plans. There is currently a lack of research studies in Egypt to investigate determinant factors controlling indoor air quality for urban homes. The present study characterizes the indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM₁₀, PM_2.5, and CO₂ in residential buildings in Alexandria city. The study also determines the indoor and outdoor factors which influence the indoor PM and CO₂ concentrations as well as it evaluates the potential indoor sources in the selected homes. This research will help in the development of future indoor air quality standards for Egypt.     

Assessment of personal integrated exposure to fine particulate matter of urban residents in Hong Kong

Metropolitan residents are concerned about their exposure to airborne pollutants. But establishing these exposures is challenging. A compact personal exposure kit (PEK) was developed to evaluate personal integrated exposure (PIE) from time-resolved data to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm (PM_2.5) in five microenvironments, including office, home, commuting, other indoor activities (other than home and office), and outdoor activities experienced both on weekdays and weekends. The study was conducted in Hong Kong. The PEK measured PM_2.5, reported location and several other factors, stored collected data, as well as reported the data back to the investigators using global system for mobile communication (GSM) telemetry. Generally, PM_2.5 concentrations in office microenvironment were found to be the smallest (13.0 μg/m³), whereas the largest PM_2.5 concentration microenvironments were experienced during outdoor activities (54.4 μg/m³). Participants spent more than 85% of their time indoors, including in offices, homes, and other public indoor venues. On average, 42% and 81% of the time were spent in homes, which contributed 52% and 79% of PIE (during weekdays and weekends, respectively), suggesting that improvement of air quality in homes may reduce overall exposures and indicating the need for actions to mitigate possible public health burdens in Hong Kong. This study also found that various indoor/outdoor microenvironments experienced by urban office workers cannot be accurately represented by general urban air quality data reported from the regulatory monitoring. Such personalized air quality information, especially while in transit or in offices and homes, may provide improved information on population exposures to air pollution.

Implications: A newly developed personal exposure kit (PEK) was used to monitor PM_2.5 exposure of metropolitan citizens in their daily life. Different microenvironments and time durations caused various personal integrated exposure (PIE). The stationary monitoring method for PIE was also compared and evaluated with PEK. Positive protection actions can be taken after understanding the major contribution to PM_2.5 exposure.     

Particulate matter and manganese exposures in Toronto,Canada

Methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) is a manganese-based gasoline additive used to enhance automobile performance. MMT has been used in Canadian gasoline for about 20 yr. Because of the potential for increased levels of Mn in particulate matter resulting from automotive exhausts, a large-scale population-based exposure study (∼1000 participant periods) was conducted in Toronto, Canada, to estimate the distribution of 3-day average personal exposures to particulate matter (PM_2.5 and PM₁₀) and Mn. A stratified, three-stage, two-phase probability, longitudinal sample design of the metropolitan population was employed. Residential indoor and outdoor, and ambient levels (at a fixed site and on a roof) of PM_2.5, PM₁₀, and Mn were also measured. Supplementary data on traffic counts, meteorology, MMT levels in gasoline, personal occupations, and activities (e.g. amount of vehicular usage) were collected. Overall precision (%RSD) for analysis of duplicate co-located samples ranged from 2.5 to 5.0% for particulate matter and 3.1 to 5.5% for Mn. The detection limits were 1.47 and 3.45 μg m^-3 for the PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 fractions, respectively, and 5.50 and 1.83 ng m^-3 for Mn in PM₁₀ and PM_2.5, respectively. These low detection limits permitted the reporting of concentrations for >98% of the samples. For PM₁₀, the personal particulate matter levels (median 48.5 μg m^-3) were much higher than either indoor (23.1 μg m^-3) or outdoor levels (23.6 μg m^-3). The median levels for PM_2.5 for personal, indoor, and outdoor were 28.4, 15.4 and 13.2 μg m^-3, respectively. The correlation between PM_2.5 personal exposures and indoor concentrations was high (0.79), while correlations between personal and the outdoor, fixed site and roof site were low (0.16–0.27). Indoor Mn concentration distributions (in PM_2.5 and PM₁₀), unlike particulate matter, exhibited much lower and less variable levels that the corresponding outdoor data. The median personal exposure was 8.0 ng m^-3, compared with 4.7 and 8.6 ng m^-3, respectively, for the indoor and outdoor distributions. The highest correlations occurred for personal vs indoor data (0.56) and for outdoor vs roof site data (0.66), and vs fixed site data (0.56). The concentration of Mn in particulate matter, expressed in ppm (w/w), revealed that the fixed site was the highest, followed by the roof site, outdoor, indoor, and personal. The personal and indoor data showed a statistically significant correlation (0.68) while all other correlations between personal or indoor data and outdoor or fixed-site data were quite small. The low correlations of personal and indoor levels with outdoor levels suggest that different sources in the indoor and outdoor microenvironments produce particle matter with dissimilar composition. The correlation results indicate that neither the roof- nor fixed-site concentrations can adequately predict personal particulate matter or Mn exposures.     

An assessment of indoor air quality in recent Mexican immigrant housing in Commerce City, Colorado

An indoor air quality assessment was conducted on 100 homes of recent Mexican immigrants in Commerce City, Colorado, an urban industrial community north of Denver. Head of households were administered a family health survey, filled out an activity diary, and participated in a home inspection. Carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) were measured for 24 h inside the main living area and outside of the homes. Harvard Impactors were used to collect 24-h samples of PM_2.5 at the same locations for gravimetric analysis. Dust samples were collected by vacuuming carpeting and flooring at four locations within the home and analyzed by ELISA for seven allergens. Mean indoor and outdoor PM_2.5 levels were 27.2 and 8.5 μg m⁻³, respectively. Indoor PM_2.5 and CO₂ were elevated in homes for which the number of hours with door/window open was zero compared to homes in which the number of hours was high (>15 h). Indoor PM_2.5 levels did not correlate with outdoor levels and tended to increase with number of inhabitants, and results indicate that the source of indoor particles were occupants and their activities, excluding smoking and cooking. Mean indoor CO₂ and CO levels were 1170 and 2.4 ppm, respectively. Carbon monoxide was higher than the 24-h National Ambient Air Quality Standard in 3 of the homes. The predominant allergens were cat (Fel d 1) and mouse (Mus m 1) allergens, found in 20 and 34 homes, respectively.     

Levels of outdoor PM2.5, absorbance and sulphur as surrogates for personal exposures among post-myocardial infarction patients in Barcelona,Spain

Outdoor levels of fine particles (PM_2.5; particles <2.5 μm) have been associated with cardiovascular health. Persons with existing cardiovascular disease have been suggested to be especially vulnerable. It is unclear, how well outdoor concentrations of PM_2.5 and its constituents measured at a central site reflect personal exposures in Southern European countries. The objective of the study was to assess the relationship between outdoor and personal concentrations of PM_2.5, absorbance and sulphur among post-myocardial infarction patients in Barcelona, Spain.Thirty-eight subjects carried personal PM_2.5 monitors for 24-h once a month (2–6 repeated measurements) between November 2003 and June 2004. PM_2.5 was measured also at a central outdoor monitoring site. Light absorbance (a proxy for elemental carbon) and sulphur content of filter samples were determined as markers of combustion originating and long-range transported PM_2.5, respectively.There were 110, 162 and 88 measurements of PM_2.5, absorbance and sulphur, respectively. Levels of outdoor PM_2.5 (median 17 μg m³) were lower than personal PM_2.5 even after excluding days with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) (median after exclusion 27 μg m³). However, outdoor concentrations of absorbance and sulphur were similar to personal concentrations after exclusion of ETS. When repeated measurements were taken into account, there was a statistically significant association between personal and outdoor absorbance when adjusting for ETS (slope 0.66, p<0.001), but for PM_2.5 the association was weaker (slope 0.51, p=0.066). Adjustment for ETS had little effect on the respective association of S (slope 0.69, p<0.001).Our results suggest that outdoor measurements of absorbance and sulphur can be used to estimate both the daily variation and levels of personal exposures also in Southern European countries, especially when exposure to ETS has been taken into account. For PM_2.5, indoor sources need to be carefully considered.     

Day-to-Day Particulate Exposures and Health Changes in Los Angeles Area Residents with Severe Lung Disease

ABSTRACT

We measured particulate matter (PM_2.5 and PM₁₀) exposures, home temperature, arterial blood oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and lung function in 30 volunteer Los Angeles area residents during four-day intervals. Continuous Holter electrocardiograms were recorded in a subgroup on the first two days. Subjects recorded symptoms and time-activity patterns in diaries during monitoring, and during a reference period one week earlier/later. All subjects had severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PM₁₀ (24-hr mean) at monitoring stations near subjects’ homes averaged 33 μg/m³, and ranged from 9 to 84 μpg/m³. In longitudinal analyses, day-to-day changes in PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ outside subjects’ homes significantly tracked concurrent station PM10 (r² = 0.22 and 0.44, respectively). Indoor and personal concentrations were less related to station readings (r² ≤ 0.1), but tracked each other (r² ≥ 0.4). In-home temperatures tracked outdoor temperatures more for lows (r² = 0.27) than for highs (r² = 0.10). These longitudinal relationships of subject-oriented and station PM measurements were generally similar to cross-sectional relationships observed previously in similar subjects. Among health measurements, only blood pressure showed reasonably consistent unfavorable longitudinal associations with particulates, more with station or outdoor PM than with indoor or personal PM.     

Investigation and modeling of the residential infiltration of fine particulate matter in Beijing,China

The objective of this study was to estimate the residential infiltration factor (Finf) of fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) and to develop models to predict PM_2.5 Finf in Beijing. Eighty-eight paired indoor–outdoor PM_2.5 samples were collected by Teflon filters for seven consecutive days during both non-heating and heating seasons (from a total of 55 families between August, 2013 and February, 2014). The mass concentrations of PM_2.5 were measured by gravimetric method, and elemental concentrations of sulfur in filter deposits were determined by energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) spectrometry. PM_2.5 Finf was estimated as the indoor/outdoor sulfur ratio. Multiple linear regression was used to construct Finf predicting models. The residential PM_2.5 Finf in non-heating season (0.70 ± 0.21, median = 0.78, n = 43) was significantly greater than in heating season (0.54 ± 0.18, median = 0.52, n = 45, p < 0.001). Outdoor temperature, window width, frequency of window opening, and air conditioner use were the most important predictors during non-heating season, which could explain 57% variations across residences, while the outdoor temperature was the only predictor identified in heating season, which could explain 18% variations across residences. The substantial variations of PM_2.5 Finf between seasons and among residences found in this study highlight the importance of incorporating Finf into exposure assessment in epidemiological studies of air pollution and human health in Beijing. The Finf predicting models developed in this study hold promise for incorporating PM_2.5 Finf into large epidemiology studies, thereby reducing exposure misclassification.

Implications: Failure to consider the differences between indoor and outdoor PM_2.5 may contribute to exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies estimating exposure from a central site measurement. This study was conducted in Beijing to investigate residential PM_2.5 infiltration factor and to develop a localized predictive model in both nonheating and heating seasons. High variations of PM_2.5 infiltration factor between the two seasons and across homes within each season were found, highlighting the importance of including infiltration factor in the assessment of exposure to PM_2.5 of outdoor origin in epidemiological studies. Localized predictive models for PM_2.5 infiltration factor were also developed.     

Behavioral and environmental determinants of personal exposures to PM2.5 in EXPOLIS – Helsinki,Finland

Behavioral and environmental determinants of PM_2.5 personal exposures were analyzed for 201 randomly selected adult participants (25–55 years old) of the EXPOLIS study in Helsinki, Finland. Personal exposure concentrations were higher than respective residential outdoor, residential indoor and workplace indoor concentrations for both smokers and non-smokers. Mean personal exposure concentrations of active smokers (31.0±31.4 μg m⁻³) were almost double those of participants exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) (16.6±11.8 μg m⁻³) and three times those of participants not exposed to tobacco smoke (9.9±6.2 μg m⁻³). Mean indoor concentrations of PM_2.5 when a member of the household smoked indoors (20.8±23.9 μg m⁻³) were approximately 2.5 times the concentrations of PM_2.5 when no smoking was reported (8.2±5.2 μg m⁻³). Interestingly, however, both mean (8.2 μg m⁻³) and median (6.9 μg m⁻³) residential indoor concentrations for non-ETS exposed participants were lower than residential outdoor concentrations (9.5 and 7.3 μg m⁻³, respectively). In simple linear regression models residential indoor concentrations were the best predictors of personal exposure concentrations. Correlations (r²) between PM_2.5 personal exposure concentrations of all participants, both smoking and non-smoking, and residential indoor, workplace indoor, residential outdoor and ambient fixed site concentrations were 0.53, 0.38, 0.17 and 0.16, respectively. Predictors for personal exposure concentrations of non-ETS exposed participants identified in multiple regression were residential indoor concentrations, workplace concentrations and traffic density in the nearest street from home, which accounted for 77% of the variance. Subsequently, step-wise regression not including residential and workplace indoor concentrations as input (as these are frequently not available), identified ambient PM_2.5 concentration and home location, as predictors of personal exposure, accounting for 47% of the variance. Ambient fixed site PM_2.5 concentrations were closely related to residential outdoor concentrations (r²=0.9, p=0.000) and PM_2.5 personal exposure concentrations were higher in summer than during other seasons. Personal exposure concentrations were significantly (p=0.040) higher for individuals living downtown compared with individuals in suburban family homes. Further analysis will focus on comparisons of determinants between Helsinki and other EXPOLIS centers.     

Comparison of Short-Term Variations (15-Minute Averages) in Outdoor and Indoor PM2.5 Concentrations

ABSTRACT

Measurements of 15-min average PM_2.5 concentrations were made with a real-time light-scattering instrument at both outdoor (central monitoring sites in three communities) and indoor (residential) locations over two seasons in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. These data are used to examine within-day variability of PM_2.5 concentrations indoors and outdoors, as well as matched indoor-to-outdoor (I/O) ratios. Concurrent gravimetric measurements of 24-hr average PM_2.5 concentrations were also obtained as a way to compare real-time measures with this more traditional metric. Results indicate that (1) within-day variability for both indoor and outdoor 15-min average PM_2.5 concentrations was substantial and comparable in magnitude to day-to-day variability for 24hr average concentrations; (2) some residences exhibited substantial variability in indoor aerosol characteristics from one day to the next; (3) peak values for indoor short-term (15-min) average PM_2.5 concentrations routinely exceeded 24-hr average outdoor values by factors of 3-4; and (4) relatively strong correlations existed between indoor and outdoor PM_2.5 concentrations for both 24-hr and 15-min averages.     

Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter in Elderly Subjects: Relation between Personal,Indoor, and Outdoor Concentrations

ABSTRACT

The time-series correlation between ambient levels, indoor levels, and personal exposure to PM_2.5 was assessed in panels of elderly subjects with cardiovascular disease in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Helsinki, Finland. Subjects were followed for 6 months with biweekly clinical visits. Each subject's indoor and personal exposure to PM_2.5 was measured biweekly, during the 24-hr period preceding the clinical visits. Outdoor PM_2.5 concentrations were measured at fixed sites. The absorption coefficients of all PM_2.5 filters were measured as a marker for elemental carbon (EC). Regression analyses were conducted for each subject separately, and the distribution of the individual regression and correlation coefficients was investigated. Personal, indoor, and ambient concentrations were highly correlated within subjects over time. Median Pearson's R between personal and outdoor PM_2.5 was 0.79 in Amsterdam and 0.76 in Helsinki. For absorption, these values were 0.93 and 0.81 for Amsterdam and Helsinki, respectively. The findings of this study provide further support for using fixed-site measurements as a measure of exposure to PM_2.5 in epidemiological time-series studies.     

Bayesian hierarchical modeling of personal exposure to particulate matter

In the US EPA's 1998 Baltimore Epidemiology-Exposure Panel Study, a group of 16 residents of a single building retirement community wore personal monitors recording personal fine particulate air pollution concentrations (PM_2.5) for 27 days, while other monitors recorded concurrent apartment, central indoor, outdoor and ambient site PM_2.5 concentrations. Using the Baltimore panel study data, we develop a Bayesian hierarchical model to characterize the relationship between personal exposure and concentrations of PM_2.5 indoors and outdoors. Personal exposure is expressed as a linear combination of time spent in microenvironments and associated microenvironmental concentrations. The model incorporates all available monitoring data and accounts for missing data and sources of uncertainty such as measurement error and individual differences in exposure. We discuss the implications of using personal versus ambient PM_2.5 measurements in characterization of personal exposure to PM_2.5.     

PM2.5, soot and NO2 indoor–outdoor relationships at homes,pre-schools and schools in Stockholm,Sweden

In developed nations people spend about 90% of their time indoors. The relationship between indoor and outdoor air pollution levels is important for the understanding of the health effects of outdoor air pollution. Although other studies describe both the outdoor and indoor atmospheric environment, few excluded a priori major indoor sources, measured the air exchange rate, included more than one micro-environment and included the presence of human activity. PM_2.5, soot, NO₂ and the air exchange rate were measured during winter and summer indoors and outdoors at 18 homes (mostly apartments) of 18 children (6–11-years-old) and also at the six schools and 10 pre-schools that the children attended. The three types of indoor environments were free of environmental tobacco smoke and gas appliances, as the aim was to asses to what extent PM_2.5, soot and NO₂ infiltrate from outdoors to indoors. The median indoor and outdoor PM_2.5 levels were 8.4 μg m^?3 and 9.3 μg m^?3, respectively. The median indoor levels for soot and NO₂ were 0.66 m^?1 × 10^?5 and 10.0 μg m^?3, respectively. The respective outdoor levels were 0.96 m^?1 × 10^?5 and 12.4 μg m^?3. The median indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios were 0.93, 0.76 and 0.92 for PM_2.5, soot and NO₂, respectively. Their infiltration factors were influenced by the micro-environment, ventilation type and air exchange rate, with aggregated values of 0.25, 0.55 and 0.64, respectively. Indoor and outdoor NO₂ levels were strongly associated (R² = 0.71), followed by soot (R² = 0.50) and PM_2.5 (R² = 0.16). In Stockholm, the three major indoor environments occupied by children offer little protection against combustion-related particles and gases in the outdoor air. Outdoor PM_2.5 seems to infiltrate less, but indoor sources compensate.     

The Influences of Ambient Particle Composition and Size on Particle Infiltration in Los Angeles,CA, Residences

Abstract

Particle infiltration is a key determinant of the indoor concentrations of ambient particles. Few studies have examined the influence of particle composition on infiltration, particularly in areas with high concentrations of volatile particles, such as ammonium nitrate (NH₄NO₃). A comprehensive indoor monitoring study was conducted in 17 Los Angeles–area homes. As part of this study, indoor/outdoor concentration ratios during overnight (nonindoor source) periods were used to estimate the fraction of ambient particles remaining airborne indoors, or the particle infiltration factor (F_INF), for fine particles (PM_2.5), its nonvolatile (i.e., black carbon [BC]) and volatile (i.e., nitrate [NO₃ ^?]) components, and particle sizes ranging between 0.02 and 10 μm. F_INF was highest for BC (median = 0.84) and lowest for NO₃ ^? (median = 0.18). The low F_INF for NO₃ ^? was likely because of volatilization of NO₃ ^? particles once indoors, in addition to depositional losses upon building entry. The F_INF for PM_2.5 (median = 0.48) fell between those for BC and NO₃ ^?, reflecting the contributions of both particle components to PM_2.5. F_INF varied with particle size, air-exchange rate, and outdoor NO₃ ^? concentrations. The F_INF for particles between 0.7 and 2 μm in size was considerably lower during periods of high as compared with low outdoor NO₃ ^? concentrations, suggesting that outdoor NO₃ ^? particles were of this size. This study demonstrates that infiltration of PM_2.5 varies by particle component and is lowest for volatile species, such as NH₄NO₃. Our results suggest that volatile particle components may influence the ability for outdoor PM concentrations to represent indoor and, thus, personal exposures to particles of ambient origin, because volatilization of these particles causes the composition of PM_2.5 to differ indoors and outdoors. Consequently, particle composition likely influences observed epidemiologic relationships based on outdoor PM concentrations, especially in areas with high concentrations of NH₄NO₃ and other volatile particles.     

Indoor particle size distributions in homes with open fires and improved Patsari cook stoves

Particulate pollution has been clearly linked with adverse health impacts from open fire cookstoves, and indoor air concentrations are frequently used as a proxy for exposures in health studies. Implicit are the assumptions that the size distributions for the open fire and improved stove are not significantly different, and that the relationship between indoor concentrations and personal exposures is the same between stoves. To evaluate the impact of these assumptions size distributions of particulate matter in indoor air were measured with the Sioutas cascade impactor in homes using open fires and improved Patsari stoves in a rural Purepecha community in Michoacan, Mexico. On average indoor concentrations of particles less than 0.25 μm were 72% reduced in homes with improved Patsari stoves, reflecting a reduced contribution of this size fraction to PM_2.5 mass concentrations from 68% to 48%. As a result the mass median diameter of indoor PM_2.5 particulate matter was increased by 29% with the Patsari improved stove compared to the open fire (from 0.42 μm to 0.59 μm, respectively). Personal PM_2.5 exposure concentrations for women in homes using open fires were approximately 61% of indoor concentration levels (156 μg m^?3 and 257 μg m^?3 respectively). In contrast personal exposure concentrations were 77% times indoor air concentration levels for women in homes using improved Patsari stoves (78 μg m^?3and 101 μg m^?3 respectively). Thus, if indoor air concentrations are used in health and epidemiologic studies significant bias may result if the shift in size distribution and the change in relationship between indoor air concentrations and personal exposure concentrations are not accounted for between different stove types.