区域大气环境中PM2．5／PM10空间分布研究

提出了一种利用移动监测技术研究区域大气环境中PM2.5／PM10空间分布的方法，并在2004年12月进行了宁波市全市域PM2.5／PM10空间分布的研究。数据显示：相同路径所代表的地区PM2.5和PM10具有很好的相关性，多数路径上PM2.5与PM10数据的相关系数平方在0．95以上，而不同路径上PM2.5与PM10的比值不同。文中给出了宁波市PM2.5／PM10污染的空间分布图，直观地显示出PM2.5／PM10污染的空间分布情况，突出了污染的重点点位和地区。     

南宁市大气颗粒物TSP、PM10、PM2.5污染水平研究

2002年在南宁市的5个典型城市功能区内,共采集了125个大气样品(按季节分别采集),初步调查了大气中颗粒物TSP、PM10、PM2.5的污染状况。结果表明,南宁市TSP、PM10、PM2.5的污染很严重,超标率分别为67．5％、82．5％、92．5％,对人体健康危害更大的PM2．5占到了PM10的63．5％左右。重污染区PM2.5的浓度超过轻污染区近一倍。     

潍坊市环境受体中PM2.5污染特征与精细化来源解析

为掌握潍坊市PM2.5的主要来源、各排放源对PM2.5的贡献与内陆、沿海城市的差别,采集了潍坊市2017年不同季节环境受体中PM2.5样品和源样品,分析了样品中的化学组分,建立了源成分谱和受体组分数据库,基于复合受体模型和源排放量等对潍坊市PM2.5进行了来源解析。结果表明:(1)PM2.5和化学组分浓度总体表现为秋冬季较高、春夏季较低。(2)潍坊市源解析结果总体介于沿海城市和内陆城市之间。(3)精细化源解析表明:煤烟尘是首要的贡献源类,其分担率达到36.0%,其中电厂、工业、民用燃煤的分担率分别为14.4%、18.0%和3.6%;机动车尘的分担率达到25.4%,其中载客、载货、其他汽车的分担率分别为6.3%、14.0%和5.1%;扬尘中土壤风沙尘、建筑水泥尘的分担率分别为10.1%和11.7%;工艺过程的贡献相对较低(3.9%)。     

PM10-PM2.5冲击采样器的研制与开发

在颗粒物研究中,分级采样是一种常用的监测方法,而冲击采样器是颗粒物分级采样的重要仪器.根据斯托克斯数,对PM10-PM2.5冲击采样器设计参数进行了详细分析,并对PM10-PM2.5的捕集效率特征进行了分析.结果表明,PM10-PM2.5冲击采样器具备理想的PM10和PM2.5捕集效率,PM10冲击采样器、PM2.5冲击采样器切割粒径分别为9.94、2.43μm,均在其允许误差范围内.     

广州市夏、冬季室内外PM2.5质量浓度的特征

2004年7月2日至8月13日和2004年11月29日至2005年1月6日分别在广州市3种类型区域(一般城市区域、道路旁、工业源附近)9个居民住宅的室内和室外同步采集了PM2.5颗粒.采用标准称重法测定PM2.5质量浓度,得到广州市夏季住宅室内外PM2.5平均质量浓度分别为67.7、74.5 μg/m3,冬季室内外PM2.5平均质量浓度分别为109.9、123.7 μg/m3.广州市PM2.5平均质量浓度,与美国PM2.5标准相比,与国内PM10标准基础上假设的PM2.5限值相比,与其他一些国内、亚洲和欧美城市的文献记录相比,结果均显示广州市PM2.5处于相当严重污染状态.广州市PM2.5质量浓度呈现明显的空间分布特征和季节变化特征;PM2.5室内质量浓度并不总是低于室外质量浓度,反映了室内空气污染的存在.     

国际PM2.5排放标准及其实施情况比较分析

对主要国际组织和部分国家的PM2.5排放标准及其实施情况进行了比较和分析.结果表明,世界卫生组织(WHO)和欧盟、美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、日本等均已制定了PM2.5排放标准；墨西哥和印度等发展中国家制定了PM2.5排放标准,中国也制定了PM2.5排放标准,但还未正式发布.WHO除制定了PM2.5的日均浓度限值和年均浓度限值外,还设立3个过渡时期目标值.发达国家制定的PM2.5日均浓度限值比较一致(在25～35 /μg/m3),低于发展中国家(墨西哥和印度)制定的限值标准.发达国家中澳大利亚制定的PM2.5排放标准最为严格,而日本制定的PM2.5排放标准在亚洲最为严格.WHO、欧盟、美国、加拿大和印度还规定了PM2.5的达标判断要求,各要求有所差异,而中国还未规定PM2.5达标的判断要求.美国制定了PM2.5排放标准的详细实施计划,中国拟发布的PM2.5排放标准也将分期实行.     

龙游县PM2.5化学组分特征及来源解析

为明确浙江省龙游县环境中PM2.5的化学组分特征及来源,于2018年在龙游县3个代表性点位采集4个季节的环境PM2.5样品,分析了PM2.5中的无机元素、水溶性无机离子和碳组分含量,并采用化学质量平衡模型(CMB)计算了7类污染源的贡献率.结果表明:3个点位PM2.5平均质量浓度春季为39.63μg/m3、夏季为29....     

潞城市大气PM10中化学元素分布特征

利用ICP-AES分析了潞城市采暖期和非采暖期4个不同功能区PM10样品中16种化学元素,对不同元素的时空分布特征进行了研究,并采用富集因子和主成分分析初步研究了潞城市PM10中元素的主要来源.结果表明,潞城市PM10中重金属污染较为严重,且各元素在采暖期的平均浓度均明显高于非采暖期.PM10中Ca、V、Cr、As、N...     

北京市2005年夏季大气颗粒物污染特征及影响因素

对2005年7～8月北京市不同功能区8个采样点PM10和PM2.5的浓度水平、空间分布、PM10/PM2.5比值进行了分析,并讨论了PM10和PM2.5的日变化特征及影响因素.结果表明,北京市夏季PM10和PM2.5日均浓度为155.37 μg/m3和87.70 μg/m3,分别为国家二级标准和美国PM2.5标准的1.04倍和1.35倍;PM2.5、PM10浓度在不同功能区存在一定差异;PM2.5和PM10的日变化以白天高,夜间低为主,且不同功能区的最高值对应于城市居民活动的不同高峰期;在湿度较高的情况下,PM2.5、PM10与湿度呈一定正相关性,且湿度对PM2.5的影响更大;降水前后PM2.5、PM10浓度变化情况表明降水的主要作用是清除粗粒子,对PM2.5的影响则较小.     

天津冬季PM2.5与PM10中有机碳、元素碳的污染特征

研究了天津冬季PM2.5和PM10中碳成分的污染特征.结果表明,天津冬季PM2.5和PM10的平均质量浓度分别为(124.4±60.9)、(224.6±131.2)μg/m3;总碳(TC)、有机碳(OC)与元素碳(EC)在PM2.5中的平均质量分数比在PM10中分别高出5.0%、3.6%、1.2%;PM2.5中OC、EC的相关系数较高,为0.95,表明OC、EC的来源相对简单,可能主要反应了燃煤和机动车尾气的贡献.OC/EC的平均值在PM2.5和PM10中分别为3.9、4.9.次生有机碳(SOC)在PM2.55和PM10中的平均质量浓度分别为14.9、23.4/μg/m3,分别占OC的48.5%(质量分数,下同)、49.8%,OC/EC较高可能主要与直接排放源有关;PM2.5中的OC1与OC2的比例明显高于PM10,而聚合碳(OPC)的比例又低于PM10,同时PM2.5与PM10中的EC1含量均较高,表明天津冬季燃煤取暖和机动车尾气是重要的污染源.     

区域大气环境中PM_(2.5)/PM_(10)空间分布研究

提出了一种利用移动监测技术研究区域大气环境中PM2.5/PM10空间分布的方法,并在2004年12月进行了宁波市全市域PM2.5/PM10空间分布的研究.数据显示:相同路径所代表的地区PM2.5和PM10具有很好的相关性,多数路径上PM2.5与PM10数据的相关系数平方在0.95以上,而不同路径上PM2.5与PM10的比值不同.文中给出了宁波市PM2.5/PM10污染的空间分布图,直观地显示出PM2.5/PM10污染的空间分布情况,突出了污染的重点点位和地区.     

西安南郊采暖期大气颗粒物PM2.5的污染特征分析

为研究西安市南郊地区采暖期大气颗粒物PM2.5的污染浓度及水溶性成分,使用颗粒物采样器于2009年1月6日～2009年2月15日进行PM2.5采样.将24 h分为8个阶段,每天3 h定时采样.结果表明,西安市南郊地区采暖期PM2.5明显污染,24 h中PM2.5污染状况最严重的时段为21:00～23:59;PM2.5中NH+4、NO-3和SO2-4是其最主要的水溶性组分,在PM2.5中的平均质量混合比分别为10.225%、13.698%和15.650%,三者在PM2.5中质量混合比最高的时段分别为06:00～08:59、03:00～05:59和18:00～20:59.     

PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment in the Barcelona Metropolitan area, Catalonia, Spain

Levels of total suspended particles, PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 were continuously monitored at an urban kerbside in the Metropolitan area of Barcelona from June 1999 to June 2000. The results show that hourly levels of PM2.5 and PM1 are consistent with the daily cycle of gaseous pollutants emitted by traffic, whereas TSP and PM10 do not follow the same trend, at least in the diurnal period. The PM2.5/PM10 ratio is dependent on the traffic emissions, whereas additional contribution sources for the >10 μm fraction must be taken into account in the diurnal period. Different PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment techniques were compared. A methodology based on the chemical determination of 83% of both PM10 and PM2.5 masses allowed us to quantify the marine (4% in PM10 and <1% in PM2.5), crustal (26% in PM10 and 8% in PM2.5) and anthropogenic (54% in PM10 and 73% in PM2.5) loads. Peaks of crustal contribution to PM10 (up to 44% of the PM10 mass) were recorded under Saharan air mass intrusions. A different seasonal trend was observed for levels of sulphate and nitrate, probably as a consequence of the different thermodynamic behaviour of these PM species and the higher summer oxidation rate of SO₂.     

西安南郊采暖期大气颗粒物PM_（2.5）的污染特征分析

为研究西安市南郊地区采暖期大气颗粒物PM2.5的污染浓度及水溶性成分,使用颗粒物采样器于2009年1月6日-2009年2月15日进行PM2.5采样。将24 h分为8个阶段,每天3 h定时采样。结果表明,西安市南郊地区采暖期PM2.5明显污染,24 h中PM2.5污染状况最严重的时段为21：00-23：59;PM2.5中NH4^＋、NO3^-和SO42^-是其最主要的水溶性组分,在PM2.5中的平均质量混合比分别为10.225%、13.698%和15.650%,三者在PM2.5中质量混合比最高的时段分别为06：00-08：59、03：00-05：59和18：00-20：59。     

Application of positive matrix factorization in characterization of PM(10) and PM(2.5) emission sources at urban roadside

The 24-h average coarse (PM₁₀) and fine (PM_2.5) fraction of airborne particulate matter (PM) samples were collected for winter, summer and monsoon seasons during November 2008-April 2009 at an busy roadside in Chennai city, India. Results showed that the 24-h average ambient PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 concentrations were significantly higher in winter and monsoon seasons than in summer season. The 24-h average PM₁₀ concentration of weekdays was significantly higher (12-30%) than weekends of winter and monsoon seasons. On weekends, the PM_2.5 concentration was found to slightly higher (4-15%) in monsoon and summer seasons. The chemical composition of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 masses showed a high concentration in winter followed by monsoon and summer seasons.The U.S.EPA-PMF (positive matrix factorization) version 3 was applied to identify the source contribution of ambient PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 concentrations at the study area. Results indicated that marine aerosol (40.4% in PM₁₀ and 21.5% in PM_2.5) and secondary PM (22.9% in PM₁₀ and 42.1% in PM_2.5) were found to be the major source contributors at the study site followed by the motor vehicles (16% in PM₁₀ and 6% in PM_2.5), biomass burning (0.7% in PM₁₀ and 14% in PM_2.5), tire and brake wear (4.1% in PM₁₀ and 5.4% in PM_2.5), soil (3.4% in PM₁₀ and 4.3% in PM_2.5) and other sources (12.7% in PM₁₀ and 6.8% in PM_2.5).     

PM composition and source reconciliation in Mexico City

PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ were collected during 24-h sampling intervals from March 1st to 31st, 2006 during the MILAGRO campaign carried out in Mexico City's northern region, in order to determine their chemical composition, oxidative activity and the estimation of the source contributions during the sampling period by means of the chemical mass balance (CMB) receptor model. PM_2.5 concentrations ranged from 32 to 70 μg m⁻³ while that of PM10 did so from 51 to 132 μg m⁻³. The most abundant chemical species for both PM fractions were: OC, EC, SO₄²⁻, NO₃⁻, NH₄⁺, Si, Fe and Ca. The majority of the PM mass was comprised of carbon, up to about 52% and 30% of the PM2.5 and PM10, respectively. PM2.5 constituted more than 50% of PM10. The redox activity, assessed by the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay, was greater for PM_2.5 than for PM₁₀, and did not display significant differences during the sampling period. The PM_2.5 source reconciliation showed that in average, vehicle exhaust emissions were its most important source in an urban site with a 42% contribution, followed by re-suspended dust with 26%, secondary inorganic aerosols with 11%, and industrial emissions and food cooking with 10% each. These results had a good agreement with the Emission Inventory. In average, the greater mass concentration occurred during O₃S that corresponds to a wind shift initially with transport to the South but moving back to the North. Taken together these results show that PM chemical composition, oxidative potential, and source contribution is influenced by the meteorological conditions.     

西安采暖期PM2.5及其水溶性无机离子的时段分布特征

为了探讨西安市采暖期大气颗粒物PM2.5及其水溶性无机成分的污染水平,于2010年1月4日—2月1日按一天8个时段(每个时段3 h)连续采集PM2.5样品四周,每周更换一次滤膜。结果显示,西安市采暖期PM2.5的质量浓度时段差异较大,呈现明显的双峰分布特征:21:00—24:00时段(147.516μg/m3)和09:00—12:00时段(141.678μg/m3)。4种被测水溶性无机组分总浓度为39.801μg/m3,占PM2.5总浓度的30.5%。SO24-和NO3-是最主要组分,占到4种无机组分的86.2%。各离子间相关分析显示,Cl-只与NO3-有较强的相关性,表明机动车尾气对Cl-有较大的贡献。SO24-和NO3-时段分布规律较为相似,与PM2.5浓度的时段分布特征相反:在PM2.5污染最轻的15:00—18:00时段,SO24-和NO3-的相对含量达到一天中的最高浓度时段,而在PM2.5双峰时段,它们的含量有所降低。     

空气中PM_(10)浓度的BP神经网络预报研究

建立了某市PM10浓度预报的分段BP神经网络模型，经验证，所建立的BP预报模型，预测精度比较高，PM10日平均浓度误差大多在-0．010～0．010mg／m^3范围内，相对误差在-20％～20％，表明BP神经网络对PM10的浓度预报是一种有效的工具。     

Identification and chemical characterization of industrial particulate matter sources in southwest Spain

A detailed physical and chemical characterization of coarse particulate matter (PM10) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the city of Huelva (in Southwestern Spain) was carried out during 2001 and 2002. To identify the major emission sources with a significant influence on PM10 and PM2.5, a methodology was developed based on the combination of: (1) real-time measurements of levels of PM10, PM2.5, and very fine particulate matter (PM1); (2) chemical characterization and source apportionment analysis of PM10 and PM2.5; and (3) intensive measurements in field campaigns to characterize the emission plumes of several point sources. Annual means of 37, 19, and 16 microg/m3 were obtained for the study period for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1, respectively. High PM episodes, characterized by a very fine grain size distribution, are frequently detected in Huelva mainly in the winter as the result of the impact of the industrial emission plumes on the city. Chemical analysis showed that PM at Huelva is characterized by high PO4(3-) and As levels, as expected from the industrial activities. Source apportionment analyses identified a crustal source (36% of PM10 and 31% of PM2.5); a traffic-related source (33% of PM10 and 29% of PM2.5), and a marine aerosol contribution (only in PM10, 4%). In addition, two industrial emission sources were identified in PM10 and PM2.5: (1) a petrochemical source, 13% in PM10 and 8% in PM2.5; and (2) a mixed metallurgical-phosphate source, which accounts for 11-12% of PM10 and PM2.5. In PM2.5 a secondary source has been also identified, which contributed to 17% of the mass. A complete characterization of industrial emission plumes during their impact on the ground allowed for the identification of tracer species for specific point sources, such as petrochemical, metallurgic, and fertilizer and phosphate production industries.