固相萃取和高效液相色谱联用测定污水中的五氯苯酚

采用固相萃取和高效液相色谱相结合的方法对污水中五氯苯酚的含量进行定量检测。结果表明,污水的pH值为4,流速控制在4mL/L以内,C18固相萃取柱对五氯苯酚有良好的吸附保留性能,以2mL的甲醇洗脱,洗脱效率在85%~95%之间。与传统的液液萃取相比,固相萃取的优势在于操作时间缩短、有机溶剂的使用量减少。     

Determination of volatile organic compounds in river water by solid phase extraction and gas chromatography

A simple, rapid, and reproducible method is described employing solid-phase extraction (SPE) using dichloromethane followed by gas chromatography (GC) with flame ionization detection (FID) for determination of volatile organic compound(VOC) from the Buriganga River water of Bangladesh. The method was applied to detect the benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene and cumene(BTEXC) in the sample collected from the surface or 15cm depth of water. Two-hundred ml of n-hexane-pretreated and filtered water samples were applied directly to a C18 SPE column. BTEXC were extracted with dichloromethane and average concentrations were obtained as 0. 104 to 0.372 μg/ml. The highest concentration of benzene was found as 0.372 μg/ml with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 6.2%, and cumene was not detected. Factors influencing SPE e.g., adsorbent types, sample load volume, eluting solvent, headspace and temperatures, were investigated. A cartridge containing a C18 adsorbent and using dichloromethane gave better performance for extraction of BTEXC from water. Average recoveries exceedina 90% could be achieved for cumene at 4℃ with a 2.7% RSD.     

喷涂废水中邻苯二甲酸酯测定的优化研究

选取固相萃取GC-MS法定量检测喷涂废水中四种邻苯二甲酸酯类(PAEs),运用正交设计法,研究了pH、洗脱剂、洗脱体积、洗脱速率和水样流速对废水中PAEs回收率的影响。结果表明,pH为2.5时回收率最佳(均100%);在该pH下,洗脱剂对4种PAEs的回收率影响最大,水样流速次之,洗脱速率与洗脱体积对4种PAEs的回收率影响相对较小。样品前处理最优参数为:水样流速8mL/min、洗脱剂为乙酸乙酯、洗脱体积4mL、洗脱速率2mL/min;该条件下4种PAEs的线性范围为0.2～8.0μg/mL,相关系数均0.99,喷漆废水中平均加标回收率为61.1%～103%,相对标准偏差为3.1%～14.6%,均可满足试验要求。     

TiO2 nanotubes as solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples

An analytical method based on TiO2 nanotubes solid-phase extraction (SPE) combined with gas chromatography (GC) was established for the analysis of seven polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): acenaphtylene, acenaphthene, anthracene, fluorene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene and pyrene. Factors a ecting the extraction e ciency including the eluent type and its volume, adsorbent amount, sample volume, sample pH and sample flow rate were optimized. The characteristic data of analytical performance were determined to investigate the sensitivity and precision of the method. Under the optimized extraction conditions, the method showed good linearity in the range of 0.01–0.8 g/mL, repeatability of the extraction (RSD were between 6.7% and 13.5%, n = 5) and satisfactory detection limits (0.017–0.059 ng/mL). The developed method was successfully applied to the analysis of surface water (tap, river and dam) samples. The recoveries of PAHs spiked in environmental water samples ranged from 90% to 100%. All the results indicated the potential application of titanate nanotubes as solid-phase extraction adsorbents to pre-treat water samples.     

Detection of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol by liquid-liquid extraction-gas chromatograph mass spectrum (LLE-GCMS)and solid phase extraction-gas chromatograph mass spectrum (SPE-GCMS)

Two sample preparation methods were introduced and compared in this paper to establish a simple, quick and exact analysis of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol. LC-18 column was employed in solid phase extraction (SPE), 1.0 mL of hexane was adopted in liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), and the extracts were analyzed by gas chromatograph mass spectrum (GCMS) in selected ion mode. Mean recoveries of SPE were low for 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) and geosmin (GSM) with values below 50%. For LLE, the recoveries were satisfyingly above 50% for 2-MIB and 80% for GSM. Detection limits of the LLE method were as low as 1.0 ng/L for GSM and 5.0 ng/L for 2-MIB. A year-long investigation on odor chemicals of drinking water in Shanghai demonstrated that in the summer, there was a serious odor problem induced by a high concentration of 2-MIB. The highest concentration of 152.82 ng/L appeared in July in raw water, while GSM flocculation was minimal with concentrations below odor threshold.     

固相萃取高效液相色谱法测定水中邻苯二甲酸酯类环境激素

建立了以HLB固相萃取柱和反相液相色谱法测定水中8种邻苯二甲酸酯类环境激素的方法,利用正交试验进行萃取条件的优化,确定固相萃取的优化条件为:洗脱剂组成为V(甲醇)∶V(乙醚)=1∶19,洗脱速率为1 0mL min,洗脱体积为9mL,清洗剂组成为V(甲醇)∶V(水)=1∶19。8种物质峰面积对浓度进行线性回归的相关系数均大于0 999,最低检出限为0 10～0 62μg L,回收率为75 1%～115 5%,相对标准偏差为0 9%～2 2%。同时将该方法应用于废水中邻苯二甲酸酯类环境激素的测定,检出DEP,BBP,DBP和DEHP4种邻苯二甲酸酯类环境激素。      

液相色谱质谱法测定水体及土壤中的类固醇激素

建立了水体和土壤中类固醇激素的液相色谱质谱分析方法。水样采用固相萃取方法富集,土壤样经加速溶剂萃取后由固相萃取净化和富集。处理好的样品经丹磺酰衍生化后上仪器分析。结果表明,类固醇激素在水体和土壤中的检出限分别为0.01~0.6ng/L和0.01~0.19ng/g,回收率分别为77%~97%和62%~119%,RSD小于6.04%和15.5%。该方法具有较高的准确度和精密度,适用于环境水体及土壤中类固醇激素残留的分析。     

活性炭纤维萃取浓缩水样中微量有机磷农药

采用活性炭纤维(ACF)为固相萃取剂填料,萃取测定水样中微量有机磷农药。研究分析了ACF用量、洗脱剂类型、农药初始质量浓度、水样过柱速度及pH等因素对萃取回收率的影响。结果表明:洗脱剂类型和ACF用量是显著的影响因素。最佳萃取条件为:含0 1μg L有机磷农药的1L加标水样,需0 2gACF和8mL二氯甲烷,水样过柱速度40mL min。pH对萃取影响不大。萃取回收率为80 7%～118%。      

SPE-GC-MS/SIM测定水节霉发生地河水中半挥发性有机物

为测定水节霉发生地河水中ρ(SVOCs)(SVOCs为半挥发性有机物),比较了LLE(液液萃取)和SPE(固相萃取)前处理法提取加标空白水样中ρ(SVOCs)的GC-MS/SIM测定结果,确定并采用重现性好的SPE-GC-MS/SIM法测定了水节霉发生地河水中的ρ(SVOCs). 结果表明,LLE和SPE法对SVOCs的加标回收率分别为41.8%~121.5%和31.5%~124.4%,相对标准偏差分别为6.0%~18.0%和0.9%~14.5%,二者回收率相差不大,但SPE法的相对标准偏差小于LLE法,SPE法重现性较好,因此采用SPE-GC-MS/SIM法测定2011年2月水节霉发生地河水中的ρ(SVOCs),共检出29种SVOCs,其中ρ(邻苯二甲酸二乙酯)、ρ(∑PAHs)、ρ(硝基苯)、ρ(1,2-二氯苯)和ρ(1,4-二氯苯)分别为1 020.59、532.14、43.39、38.52和19.57 ng/L,均未超出GB 5749—2006《生活饮用水卫生标准》相关限值,表明水节霉发生地未发生SVOCs污染.      

固相膜萃取-气相色谱法测定地表水中有机氯农药研究

研究了固相膜萃取对地表水中有机氯农药(OCPs)物质的提取效果,并与液液提取法(LLE)进行比较.建立了固相膜萃取/气相色谱法检测地表水中20种有机氯农药的方法.结果表明:当萃取膜为HLB膜,洗脱液溶剂为丙酮和正己烷,萃取效果最理想,20种OCPs的回收率稳定在74.1%~94.3%之间,固相膜萃取法与传统液液提取法相比,既提高了萃取效率同时又减少了有机萃取溶剂的用量.该法检测实际样品时,同时加入2种内标指示剂对方法的性能进行了验证,2种内标示踪剂的回收率分别为71.6%~94.8%和69.9%~109.5%,样品中20种OCPs均未检出.     

北京市城市河流中精神活性物质的污染水平及环境风险

为评价北京市城市河流地表水体中5种精神活性物质〔METH(甲基苯丙胺)、AMP(苯丙胺)、KET(氯胺酮)、EPH(麻黄碱)和HA(羟亚胺)〕的环境风险,通过对固相萃取柱(Oasis HLB、Oasis MCX、Oasis WAX和Oasis PRiME HLB)类型、水样酸化、洗脱剂类型及体积等条件的确定,建立了同时测定水环境中精神活性物质的固相萃取-液相色谱-质谱(SPE-LC-MS/MS)联用方法,并对北京市城市河流地表水体中5种精神活性物质的质量浓度水平进行了调查,采用RQ(风险熵)法进行了风险评价. 结果表明,在水样未酸化条件下,Oasis MCX柱对精神活性物质的回收率最高,使用含5%(V/V)氨水的甲醇作为洗脱液,5种精神活性物质的回收率可以达到81.8%~91.1%. 地表水水体基质加标结果表明,5种精神活性物质的加标回收率均大于75.5%,相对标准偏差均小于10.0%. 方法检出限为0.30~0.80 ng/L,定量限为1.00~2.68 ng/L. 北京市7条城市河流中5种精神活性物质的质量浓度在1.00~99.51 ng/L之间. EPH在所有采样点均被检出且质量浓度较高,ρ(EPH)平均值为22.79 ng/L;ρ(AMP)相对较低,在1.54~11.23 ng/L之间,但AMP检出率为97.06%;ρ(METH)较高,平均值为14.63 ng/L,最高值(99.51 ng/L)出现在坝河. 研究显示,北京市地表水中5种精神活性物质的RQ均小于0.1,表明其可能的环境风险较低,但由于精神活性物质本身具有生物活性,它们对城市河流水生生态系统产生的潜在危害不容忽视.      

固相萃取-气相色谱法快速分析水中硝基苯类化合物

建立了固相萃取-气相色谱定量分析水中硝基苯类化合物的分析方法,详尽地叙述了水样预处理过程.对固相萃取,水样预处理和色谱分离条件做了试验并予以优化.采用ODS-C18固相萃取柱将样品浓缩富集后,以DB-17色谱柱(30 m×0.32 mm×0.25 μm)为分离柱,以ECD和FID检测.方法检出限在0.12～90 μg/...     

典型药物及个人护理品在黄东海海域水体中的检测、分布规律及其风险评估

目前对沿海地区存在的药物及个人护理品(PPCPs)的了解十分有限,建立能同时精确检测海水样品中多种PPCPs的方法至关重要.本研究选取非甾体类消炎药、抗生素、脂质调节剂和兴奋剂等类别的9种PPCPs作为检测对象,建立固相萃取-高效液相色谱-质谱联用方法(SPE-HPLC-MS),确定了固相萃取柱的填料、洗脱液组成及用量等最佳实验条件.结果表明,萃取柱为CNW HLB,洗脱液为甲醇∶乙腈(1∶1,体积比),洗脱液体积为6 m L,水样pH为7,流速为5 m L·min~(-1),螯合剂EDTA-Na_2添加量为1 g,且浓缩倍数为500倍时,萃取效果最佳.9种PPCPs的线性回归方程均具有良好线性,相关性系数均大于0. 999,回收率在82%～106%之间,相对标准偏差在1. 6%～14%之间,检出限在0. 01～2 ng·L~(-1)之间,满足海水中痕量分析的要求.于2018年夏季对黄东海表层水体中PPCPs的分布特性、来源和分布规律进行研究.9种PPCPs均被检出,主要污染物是NAP、IBU、GEM、CAF和ASA.在空间分布上,PPCPs浓度整体呈现河口近岸高,远海海域较低的趋势,黄海海域中PPCPs浓度高于东海,这与黄海海域污染源多、其水交换能力与东海相比较弱有关.主成分分析结果显示,表层海水中的PPCPs浓度与盐度和pH之间具有负相关性,与叶绿素a具有一定正相关性,表明PPCPs的主要来源为陆源输入.运用风险熵值法对该海域的PPCPs进行环境风险评估,9种PPCPs的RQ均小于1,其中IBU和NAP的RQ大于0. 1,可能对该海域产生中度风险危害,其余PPCPs的RQ均小于0. 1,表明其目前对黄海及东海海域基本没有危害.     

GC-ECD测定地表水中的硝基苯类和氯苯类化合物

文章分别以液液萃取法和固相萃取法作为预处理方法,建立了地表水中12种硝基苯类和氯苯类化合物的气相色谱-电子捕获检测器(GC-ECD)分析检测方法,其中包括1,2-二硝基苯、1,3-二硝基苯、1,4-二硝基苯,2-硝基氯苯、3-硝基氯苯、4-硝基氯苯、1,2,3,4-四氯苯、1,2,3,5-四氯苯、1,2,4,5-四氯苯、2,4-二硝基甲苯、2,4-二硝基氯苯、2,4,6-三硝基甲苯。通过对实验条件的优化,对100 mL水样的方法检出限为液液萃取0.05⁰.15μg/L,固相萃取0.100.15μg/L,固相萃取0.10⁰.16μg/L范围内,加标回收率分别为80.7%0.16μg/L范围内,加标回收率分别为80.7%⁸8.0%和74.2%88.0%和74.2%¹01%,相对标准偏差分别在1.8%101%,相对标准偏差分别在1.8%⁵.3%和3.7%5.3%和3.7%⁵.5%之间。应用所建立的方法,对上海市地表水样进行监测分析,12种目标物质仅检出硝基氯苯,浓度为ND5.5%之间。应用所建立的方法,对上海市地表水样进行监测分析,12种目标物质仅检出硝基氯苯,浓度为ND⁰.52μg/L,样品加标回收率为液液萃取72.5%0.52μg/L,样品加标回收率为液液萃取72.5%⁸1.9%,固相萃取67.0%81.9%,固相萃取67.0%⁹1.0%。     

固相萃取—气相色谱法测定海水中的666、DDT

采用固相萃取技术富集海水中的666、DDT,并使用气相色谱进行测定。主要包括不同填料(C8、C18、C18-N)、SPE柱规格(500 mg/3 mL、500 mg/6 mL)、洗脱试剂、上样流速、水样pH和洗脱试剂体积6个因素对666、DDT富集效率的影响。最终确定最优条件为:采用500 mg/6 mL C18SPE小柱,调节海水pH=6,上样流速4~5mL/min,10 mL二氯甲烷洗脱。优化后的固相萃取-气相色谱方法测定海水中666、DDT加标10 ng/L回收率为75.7%~110.4%,精密度为1.16%~4.00%,方法检出限为0.19~1.20 ng/L。     

固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定废水中喹乙醇和3种四环素类抗生素

建立了固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时检测废水中喹乙醇、土霉素(OTC)、四环素(TC)和金霉素(CTC)的分析方法。实验对前处理方法和色谱条件进行了探讨和优化,结果表明水样pH值为2.5,不加提取剂时Oasis HLB柱的纯化富集效果最好,液相色谱在375 nm处对四种物质的分离性能最佳。该方法具有良好的线性关系(r>0.999),最低检出限为11～26 ug/L。喹乙醇和3种四环素类抗生素的加标回收率分别为91%～95%,90%～91%,86%～90%和81%～86%,相对标准偏差为3.4%～6.3%。     

搅拌棒吸附萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用测定海水中邻苯二甲酸酯

为了测定海水中痕量邻苯二甲酸酯,构建并优化了搅拌棒吸附萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用方法.选取邻苯二甲酸二甲酯、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯、邻苯二甲酸丁基苄基酯、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯和邻苯二甲酸二辛酯这6种邻苯二甲酸酯作为研究对象,优化了萃取时间和解析时间等5种因素,通过回收率和相对标准偏差等对SBSE-GC-MS方法进行验证.结果表明,最佳萃取时间为2 h,最佳甲醇添加量为10%,最佳氯化钠添加量为5%,最佳解析时间为50 min,最佳解析溶剂为甲醇∶乙腈=4∶1(体积比).6种邻苯二甲酸酯的峰面积和质量浓度线性对应关系良好,相关性系数均大于0.997,检出限在0.25~174.42 ng·L-1之间,不同质量浓度的回收率均在56.97%~124.22%之间,相对标准偏差在0.41%~14.39%之间.在建立方法的基础上,测定了胶州湾主要河流入海口的样品,结果表明所有采样点均检出邻苯二甲酸酯,邻苯二甲酸二乙酯检出率为100%,质量浓度较大的污染物为邻苯二甲酸二丁酯、邻苯二甲酸丁基苄基酯、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯和邻苯二甲酸二辛酯.     

固相萃取技术及其研究进展

对固相萃取技术的原理和特点,萃取参数(吸附剂用量、背景体积及洗脱溶剂等)与萃取效率的规律,吸附剂的研究进展与发展趋势,以及目前的固相萃取在线联用技术等方面进行了阐述。该技术比传统液—液萃取用时短、二次污染小、选择性好,是一种很有前途的样品预处理技术。已广泛应用于环境样品中多环芳烃、农药、卤代烃、有机氯化合物、酚类等优先控制污染物的测定。     

PSE-UPLC-MS/MS法测定污泥中9种药物与个人护理品

利用加压溶剂萃取法(PSE)提取、固相萃取法净化并结合超高效液相色谱-串联四极杆质谱仪(UPLC-MS/MS)检测,建立了污水处理厂污泥中7个药剂类别的9种药物与个人护理品(舒必利、咖啡因、美托洛尔、氯霉素、萘啶酸、卡马西平、驱蚊胺、氯贝酸、苯扎贝特)的分析检测方法.在萃取方法中,对加压溶剂萃取的污泥质量和溶剂进行了优化;在净化方法中,对固相萃取柱种类、固相萃取柱容量、洗脱溶剂和洗脱量进行了优选.结果表明,方法检出限(以干质量计,下同)在2.7～65.0 pg/g范围内,加标回收率在67.0%～130%之间,相对标准偏差均小于25%(即标准偏差小于25 μg/L).应用所建立的分析方法,对北京某污水处理厂的脱水污泥进行了测定,9种目标物质含量为nd(未检出)～50.5 ng/g,其中,舒必利、咖啡因、卡马西平、驱蚊胺和氯贝酸在2010年春、夏季2次采样均有检出.      

Simultaneous analysis of five taste and odor compounds in surface water using solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

In this paper, a method using solid-phase extraction (SPE) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was developed to simultaneously analyze five taste and odor compounds in surface water, i.e., 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB), 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA), 2-isopropyl-3-methoxy pyrazine (IPMP), 2-isobutyl-3-methoxy pyrazine (IBMP), and trans-1,10-dimethyl-trans-9-decalol (geosmin, GSM). The mass spectrometry was operated in selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Three kinds of SPE columns and three eluting solvents were compared, the C18 column was chosen as optimum SPE column, and methanol was chosen as the optimum eluting solvent. It was found that the method showed good linearity in the range of 1–200 ng·L⁻¹ and gave detection limits of 0.5–1.5 ng·L⁻¹ for individual compounds. Good recoveries (93.5%–108%) and relative standard deviations (1.58%–7.31%) were also obtained. Additionally, concentrations of these taste and odor compounds in Jinan’s surface and drinking water were analyzed by applying this method, and the results showed that GSM and 2-MIB were the dominant taste and odor compounds in Jinan’s raw water.