Emissions of parent, nitrated, and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from indoor corn straw burning in normal and controlled combustion conditions

Emission factors （EFs） of parent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons （pPAHs）, nitrated PAHs （nPAHs）, and oxygenated PAHs （oPAHs） were measured for indoor corn straw burned in a brick cooking stove under different burning conditions. The EFs of total 28 pPAHs, 6 nPAHs and 4 oPAHs were （7.9 ±3.4）, （6.5 ±1.6）×10^-3, and （6.1 ±1.4）×10^-1mg/kg, respectively. Fuel charge size had insignificant influence on the pollutant emissions. Measured EFs increased significantly in a fast burning due to the oxygen deficient atmosphere formed in the stove chamber. In both restricted and enhanced air supply conditions, the EFs of pPAHs, nPAHs and oPAHs were significantly higher than those measured in normal burning conditions. Though EFs varied among different burning conditions, the composition profiles and calculated isomer ratios were similar, without significant differences. The results from the stepwise regression model showed that fuel burning rate, air supply amount, and modified combustion efficiency were the three most significant influencing factors, explaining 72%-85% of the total variations.     

Influence of fuel mass load, oxygen supply and burning rate on emission factor and size distribution of carbonaceous particulate matter from indoor corn straw burning

The uncertainty in emission estimation is strongly associated with the variation in emission factor (EF),which could be influenced by a variety of factors such as fuel properties,stove type,fire management and even methods used in measurements.The impacts of these factors are complicated and often interact with each other.Controlled burning experiments were conducted to investigate the influences of fuel mass load,air supply and burning rate on the emissions and size distributions of carbonaceous particulate matter (PM) from indoor corn straw burning in a cooking stove.The results showed that the EFs of PM (EFPM),organic carbon (EFOC) and elemental carbon (EFEC) were independent of the fuel mass load.The differences among them under different burning rates or air supply amounts were also found to be insignificant (p > 0.05) in the tested circumstances.PM from the indoor corn straw burning was dominated by fine PM with diameter less than 2.1 μm,contributing 86.4%±3.9% of the total.The size distribution of PM was influenced by the burning rate and air supply conditions.On average,EF PM,EF OC and EF EC for corn straw burned in a residential cooking stove were (3.84±1.02),(0.846±0.895) and (0.391±0.350) g/kg,respectively.EF PM,EF OC and EF EC were found to be positively correlated with each other (p < 0.05),but they were not significantly correlated with the EF of co-emitted CO,suggesting that special attention should be paid to the use of CO as a surrogate for other incomplete combustion pollutants.     

生物质露天焚烧及家庭燃用的多环芳烃排放特征研究

农村地区生物质燃烧排放是大气多环芳烃(PAHs)的重要来源之一.本研究利用建立的烟尘罩稀释通道采样系统,对我国典型的生物质燃烧方式—水稻、玉米、花生、大豆秸秆的家庭炉灶燃烧,并对水稻、玉米、花生秸秆以及荔枝树、大叶榕、小叶榕等落叶的露天焚烧进行实验室模拟,实测了秸秆野外焚烧、落叶野外焚烧、秸秆炉灶燃烧等3种典型生物质燃烧类型排放的气相及颗粒相PAHs的排放因子.结果表明,本研究生物质露天焚烧PAHs排放因子高于大部分已有实验结果,秸秆炉灶燃烧PAHs排放因子亦高于大部分排放清单采用值.3类燃料燃烧排放PAHs的谱分布相近,均以中低环PAHs为主,中高环(4~6环)PAHs比例为22.2%~28.8%.采用某单一数值作为某类源PAHs特征比的取值,并将其运用于大气PAHs的来源解析可能会造成偏差.     

秸秆露天焚烧典型大气污染物排放因子

利用烟气污染物稀释采样系统,基于实际测试,针对玉米、小麦、花生和棉花4种农作物秸秆开展露天焚烧排放大气污染物采集和分析.利用修正燃烧效率区分燃烧状态,根据碳平衡法计算烟气中颗粒物和气态污染物排放因子.结果表明,4种秸秆露天焚烧CO、SO₂、NO_x和CH₄平均排放因子分别在7.39~92.4g/kg、0.11~0.89g/kg、0.72~3.86g/kg和0.2~5.45g/kg之间,PM_2.5平均排放因子在1.48~13.29g/kg之间.OC和EC的质量分别占PM_2.5全部质量的27.7%~54.3%和4.4%~17.1%,是PM_2.5的主要组成成分.污染物排放主要来自混合燃烧状态,焖烧状态排放污染物浓度相对较高.随着含水率升高,焖烧过程增强显著,CO、CH₄、PM_2.5和OC的排放因子升高,其中PM_2.5排放量增高主要是由OC排放占比升高导致.     

民用燃煤不同燃烧阶段细颗粒物排放特征

研究了民用燃煤在不同燃烧阶段排放PM_2.5的质量浓度分布特征.结果表明,散煤与正烧炉在旺火阶段排放颗粒物粒径主要集中在0.2μm以下（d₅₀=0.15μm）,加煤和封火阶段在0.2~0.5μm （d₅₀=0.38mm）,质量占比46.6%~68.97%.型煤与正烧炉在各阶段排放的颗粒物均以0.2μm以下颗粒物为主,质量占比44.64%~56.24%.扫描电镜（SEM）观察到燃煤排放PM_2.5为大量超细颗粒物聚集形成的簇团状结构.用碳平衡法计算得到散煤加煤阶段的PM_2.5排放因子为4.72g/kg,分别是旺火和封火阶段的12和11倍.将散煤更换为型煤,能够使得加煤阶段的PM_2.5排放因子减少90.9%,从而显著降低PM_2.5排放.     

民用燃煤不同燃烧阶段细颗粒物排放特征

研究了民用燃煤在不同燃烧阶段排放PM_2.5的质量浓度分布特征.结果表明,散煤与正烧炉在旺火阶段排放颗粒物粒径主要集中在0.2μm以下（d₅₀=0.15μm）,加煤和封火阶段在0.2~0.5μm （d₅₀=0.38mm）,质量占比46.6%~68.97%.型煤与正烧炉在各阶段排放的颗粒物均以0.2μm以下颗粒物为主,质量占比44.64%~56.24%.扫描电镜（SEM）观察到燃煤排放PM_2.5为大量超细颗粒物聚集形成的簇团状结构.用碳平衡法计算得到散煤加煤阶段的PM_2.5排放因子为4.72g/kg,分别是旺火和封火阶段的12和11倍.将散煤更换为型煤,能够使得加煤阶段的PM_2.5排放因子减少90.9%,从而显著降低PM_2.5排放.     

民用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5和PM10中碳组分排放因子对比

在实验室中模拟民用燃料在家庭炉灶中的燃烧,应用稀释通道系统采集颗粒物,获得玉米秸秆、薪柴、蜂窝煤和块煤四种常用民用燃料燃烧排放PM10,PM2.5及载带碳组分的排放因子.结果表明,民用燃料燃烧排放的颗粒物以细颗粒为主, PM2.5占PM10的70%~90%.颗粒物排放因子最大的为块煤,其PM2.5和PM10的排放因子分别为9.837和11.929g/kg,分别是蜂窝煤的12.6和13.7倍;玉米秸秆和薪柴PM2.5和PM10的排放因子稍低于块煤,为7.359~10.444g/kg.4种燃料燃烧OC排放因子块煤最高,其在PM2.5和PM10中分别为5.29和5.19g/kg.薪柴燃烧EC的排放因子最高,其在PM2.5和PM10 中的排放因子分别为1.065和1.126g/kg.块煤两种粒径上EC的排放因子略低于薪柴.蜂窝煤EC的排放因子最低,比薪柴低300倍左右,玉米秸秆EC的排放因子也要比薪柴低10倍左右.碳组分是块煤,秸秆,薪柴排放颗粒物的主要成分,其含量在40%~60%之间,该值比蜂窝煤高3倍.四种燃料对应的OC/EC比值差异很大,薪柴和块煤燃烧排放颗粒该值为3~6,秸秆和蜂窝煤燃烧排放颗粒其值高达30~50.     

福建省4种主要乔木枝叶燃烧含碳物质排放特性分析

森林可燃物燃烧释放的大量含碳物质对大气环境和生态系统碳平衡具有重要影响,揭示森林可燃物燃烧的含碳物质排放特性具有重要的科学意义.运用自主设计的生物质燃烧系统,模拟福建省4种主要乔木树种——马尾松、杉木、樟树、桉树的枝、叶燃烧,分析其在不同燃烧状态（阴燃、明燃）下含碳气体（CO、CO₂、C_xH_y）和PM_2.5的排放因子（分别以EF_CO2、EF_CO、EF_CxHy、EF_PM2.5表示）及PM_2.5中的碳质组分之间的差异性.结果表明,马尾松、杉木、樟树、桉树燃烧排放的含碳气体、PM_2.5的排放因子及PM_2.5的碳质组分在不同燃烧状态下差异较大,阴燃时EF_CO2、EF_CO、EF_CxHy、EF_PM2.5平均值在分别为（1 400.7±76.5）（297.6±16.2）（25.2±3.9）（23.9±4.3）g/kg,明燃时分别为（1 582.8±73.2）（253.6±16.1）（17.2±3.7）（8.4±2.8）g/kg,除CO₂外其他多为阴燃显著高于明燃.针叶树种（杉木、马尾松）枝、叶在阴燃时EF_PM2.5高于阔叶树种（樟树、桉树）,而明燃时差异相对较小.PM_2.5中OC（有机碳）、EC（元素碳）、TC（OC+EC）的质量分数阴燃时分别为45.6%、12.0%、57.6%,明燃时分别为42.9%、17.6%、60.5%.EF_OC/EF_PM2.5、EF_EC/EF_PM2.5、EF_OC/EF_EC在两种燃烧状态下具有不同的特征,其特征值可作为区分不同燃烧源或不同燃烧状态的指标;EF_OC/EF_PM2.5在明燃和阴燃时差异不大,平均值分别为0.49、0.46;EF_EC/EF_PM2.5明燃显著高于阴燃,平均值分别为0.18、0.12;4种乔木的枝、叶燃烧的EF_OC/EF_EC明燃低于阴燃,平均值分别为2.59和4.01.在两种燃烧状态下OC与PM_2.5的排放因子均呈显著相关.研究显示,不同燃烧条件以及不同燃料燃烧对排放含碳物质具有显著影响.      

民用固体燃料及烹调油烟杂环胺排放及健康风险评价

模拟了典型固体燃料的民用燃烧及家庭烹饪食用油过程,分别采用烟尘罩稀释采样系统和小型烟尘罩采集烟气.利用高效液相色谱-紫外检测法测定了5种典型致癌杂环胺的排放特征.估算了2012年杂环胺排放量及不同情景下妇女炊事吸入杂环胺的致癌风险.结果表明,秸秆、薪柴、烟煤、无烟煤燃烧2-氨基-3-甲基-9H-吡啶[2,3-b]吲哚（MeAaC）排放因子均值为5.2~142.9μg/kg、2-氨基-9H-吡啶[2,3-b]吲哚（AaC）排放因子为0.6~37.8μg/kg,2-氨基-1-甲基-6-苯基咪唑并[4,5-b]吡啶（PhIP）排放因子为1.5~25.9μg/kg.植物油烹调MeAaC和2-氨基-3-甲基咪唑并（4,5-f）喹啉（IQ）排放因子均值分别为6.8μg/kg和1.5μg/kg.动物油烹调MeAaC、2-氨基-3,4-二甲基-3H-咪唑并喹啉（MeIQ）和AaC排放因子均值分别为6.2μg/kg、2.0μg/kg和1.1μg/kg.秸秆使用分别占PhIP、MeAaC和AaC 排放的93.0%、76.2%和76.2%.薪柴使用占AaC、MeAaC和PhIP排放的22.1%、7.7%和4.0%.烟煤使用占MeAaC、 PhIP和AaC排放的15.9%、2.8%和1.8%.健康风险评价表明,在缺乏有效排烟的情况下,使用烟煤（哈尔滨）或秸秆炊事的家庭妇女暴露于杂环胺总致癌风险分别为4.60×10^-5和1.84×10^-5,超过EPA建议值.使用薪柴或烟煤（包头）炊事的家庭妇女暴露于杂环胺总致癌风险分别为4.50×10^-6和4.31×10^-6,略高于EPA建议值.使用无烟煤及电能炊事妇女暴露于杂环胺总致癌风险为可忽略水平.     

长三角地区秸秆燃烧排放因子与颗粒物成分谱研究

为获取长三角地区秸秆燃烧污染物排放因子及其颗粒物成分谱,利用自行设计开发的开放式燃烧源排放测试系统,选取小麦、水稻、油菜、豆秸和薪柴等5类典型作物秸秆,分别采用露天焚烧和炉灶燃烧2种燃烧方式,实测其气态污染物和颗粒物排放特征.结果表明,露天燃烧各类秸秆的CO、NOx和PM2.5平均排放因子约为28.7、1.2和2.65 g·kg-1,由于炉灶氧含量相对较低,燃烧不充分,其污染物排放因子总体高于露天燃烧,分别为81.9、2.1和8.5 g·kg-1.各类秸秆中,油菜的排放水平相对较高.含碳组分(OC和EC)是生物质秸秆燃烧产生PM2.5的主要组成,在露天燃烧中OC和EC的质量分数分别占(38.92±13.93)%和(5.66±1.54)%;炉灶燃烧中OC和EC分别为(26.37±10.14)%和(18.97±10.76)%.Cl-、K+等水溶性离子也有较大贡献,在露天燃烧中分别为(13.27±6.82)%和(12.41±3.02)%;在炉灶燃烧中分别为(16.25±9.34)%和(13.62±7.91)%.小麦、水稻、油菜和豆秸等作物秸秆露天燃烧排放颗粒物的K+/OC值分别为0.30、0.52、0.49和0.15,这些特征值可用于判断长三角区域空气质量受秸秆燃烧排放影响的程度,为大气污染来源解析提供直接的判断依据.     

国内民用燃煤烟气中多环芳烃排放因子研究

模拟国内民用燃煤过程.确定燃煤排放烟气中PAHs的排放因子、PAHs在烟气气相与颗粒相之间的分配、特征排放谱以及不同燃烧方式的影响.结果表明:以15种母体PAHs加和计,燃煤排放因子的变化范围为71～882 mg·k8-1,排放因子和有毒PAHs组份排放量由高至低依次为烟煤、蜂窝煤和无烟煤,主要毒性成份存在于颗粒相中.PAH组份的气-固相分配比例与其饱和蒸汽压存在显著的正相关关系.燃煤类型和燃煤中挥发组份对烟气PAHs排放因子、气-固相分配以及排放谱分布具有决定性作用.另外,不同燃烧方式对燃煤排放因子也有一定影响,缺氧条件会导致排放系数升高.     

Emission of intermediate volatility organic compounds from a ship main engine burning heavy fuel oil

Intermediate volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) are crucial precursors of secondary organic aerosol (SOA). In this study, gaseous IVOCs emitted from a ship main engine burning heavy fuel oil (HFO) were investigated on a test bench, which could simulate the real-world operations and emissions of ocean-going ships. The chemical compositions, emission factors (EFs) and volatility distributions of IVOC emissions were investigated. The results showed that the main engine burning HFO emitted a large amount of IVOCs, with average IVOC EFs of 20.2–201?mg/kg-fuel. The IVOCs were mainly comprised of unspeciated compounds. The chemical compositions of exhaust IVOCs were different from that of HFO fuel, especially for polycyclic aromatic compounds and alkylcyclohexanes. The volatility distributions of IVOCs were also different between HFO exhausts and HFO fuel. The distinctions in IVOC emission characteristics between HFO exhausts and HFO fuel should be considered when assessing the IVOC emission and related SOA formation potentials from ocean-going ships burning HFO, especially when using fuel-surrogate models.     

牛粪燃烧实时排放挥发性有机物特征研究

在实验室模拟青海和西藏2种牛粪在民用炉具中的燃烧过程,采用稀释通道系统与质子转移飞行时间质谱（PTR-TOF-MS）在线分析牛粪燃烧排放的挥发性有机物（VOCs）,通过电子秤实时记录燃料质量的动态变化,获得牛粪燃烧排放VOCs浓度的时间序列与实时排放因子.结果表明,70g牛粪一次燃烧过程持续1100~1500s.牛粪燃烧排放VOCs浓度的时间变化趋势总体上呈单峰分布;西藏牛粪在燃烧450s左右VOCs浓度达到峰值7.92×10^-6;青海牛粪在燃烧400s左右VOCs浓度达到峰值6.01×10^-6.牛粪燃烧VOCs实时排放因子变化范围为40.74~156.88mg/g,趋势不同于VOCs浓度变化,随燃烧过程进行排放因子呈上升趋势.牛粪燃烧至3~4min左右,VOCs排放因子最低.甲醇、甲醛和乙醛3种VOCs排放因子占比最大,其中西藏牛粪燃烧3种VOCs排放占比分别为24.0%±1.9%、11.9%±1.8%和27.4%±1.4%,青海牛粪为22.0%±1.1%、13.3%±2.9%和17.7%±4.6%.本研究首次给出了牛粪燃烧VOCs实时排放因子,可为高时间分辨率排放清单建立和青藏高原地区室内空气污染的健康效应研究提供基础数据.     

机动车细微/超细颗粒物数浓度排放因子隧道实测研究

选取澳洲城市某公交车专用隧道连续4dSMPS监测颗粒物数据,并根据隧道内交通、风速实测数据,计算出隧道内机动车排放各粒径范围细微/超细颗粒物数浓度单车排放因子,并根据每10min间隔的柴油/CNG公交车混合比,采用最小二乘法得出两种车型的综合排放因子2.61×1014个.辆-1.km-1.通过多元回归分析计算颗粒物粒径谱排放因子发现,柴油公交车主要排放积聚态颗粒物;CNG公交车主要排放核模态颗粒物,柴油公交车和CNG公交车总颗粒物排放因子分别为3.96×1014个.辆-1.km-1和9.33×1013个.辆-1.km-1.     

Size distributions and sources of elements in particulate matter at curbside, urban and rural sites in Beijing

Size distributions of 29 elements in aerosols collected at urban, rural and curbside sites in Beijing were studied. High levels of Mn, Ni, As, Cd and Pb indicate the pollution of toxic heavy metals cannot be neglected in Beijing. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicates 4 sources of combustion emission, crust related sources, traffic related sources and volatile species from coal combustion. The elements can be roughly divided into 3 groups by size distribution and enrichment factors method (EFs). Group 1 elements are crust related and mainly found within coarse mode including Al, Mg, Ca, Sc, Ti, Fe, Sr, Zr and Ba; Group 2 elements are fossil fuel related and mostly concentrated in accumulation mode including S, As, Se, Ag, Cd, Tl and Pb; Group 3 elements are multi-source related and show multi-mode distribution including Be, Na, K, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Mo, Sn and Sb. The EFs of Be, S, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Ga, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, Tl and Pb show higher values in winter than in summer indicating sources of coal combustion for heating in winter. The abundance of Cu and Sb in coarse mode is about 2-6 times higher at curbside site than at urban site indicating their traffic sources. Coal burning may be the major source of Pb in Beijing since the phase out of leaded gasoline, as the EFs of Pb are comparable at both urban and curbside sites, and about two times higher in winter than that in summer.     

Characteristics of nanoparticles emitted from burning of biomass fuels

The characteristics of the particles of the smoke that is emitted from the burning ofbiomass fuels were experimentally investigated using a laboratory-scale tube furnace and different types of biomass fuels： rubber wood, whole wood pellets and rice husks. Emitted amounts of particles, particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons （PAHs） and water-soluble organic carbon （WSOC） are discussed relative to the size of the emitted particles, ranging to as small as nano-size （〈70 nm）, and to the rate of heating rate during combustion, differential thermal analysis （DTA） and thermogravimetric analysis （TG） techniques were used to examine the effect of heating rate and biomass type on combustion behaviors relative to the characteristics of particle emissions. In the present study, more than 30% of the smoke particles from the burning ofbiomass fuel had a mass that fell within a range of 〈 100 nm. Particles smaller than 0.43 μm contributed greatly to the total levels of toxic PAHs and WSOC. The properties of these particles were influenced by the fuel component, the combustion conditions, and the particle size. Although TC--DTA results indicated that the heating rate in a range of 10-20℃did not show a significant effect on the combustion properties, there was a slight increase in the decomposition temperature as heating rate was increased. The nano-size particles had the smallest fraction of particle mass and particle-bound PAHs, but nonetheless these particles registered the largest fraction of particle-bound WSOC.     

室内木柴燃烧排放水溶性离子粒径分布特征

基于实验室模拟燃烧和稀释通道采样系统,采用荷电低压撞击采样器采集了6种典型木柴燃烧排放的14级粒径段颗粒物.采用离子色谱分析了8种水溶性离子,获得水溶性离子的分粒径排放因子和排放特征.结果表明,Ca²⁺的排放因子呈双峰分布,在0.25~0.38和2.5~3.6μm粒径段出现峰值,分别为0.14和0.16mg/kg.其余离子的排放因子为单峰分布.NH₄⁺、NO₃^-和SO₄^2-的排放因子在0.25~0.38μm粒径段出现峰值,分别为0.41、0.58和0.84mg/kg.K⁺和Cl^-的排放因子在0.15~0.25μm内出现峰值,分别为0.89和0.99mg/kg.木柴燃烧排放总水溶性离子的质量中值粒径为（0.30±0.07）μm,各离子的质量中值粒径范围为0.24~0.44μm.PM_0.094、PM_0.94、PM_2.5和PM₁₀中水溶性离子的排放因子变化范围分别为1.04~9.33、5.00~48.87、5.46~52.00和6.14~53.68mg/kg.木柴燃烧排放颗粒物中K⁺/Cl^-、K⁺/NO₃^-、K⁺/SO₄^2-和SO₄^2-/NO₃^-比值随粒径变化而变化,其排放初始值在应用于源解析和生物质燃烧排放气溶胶传输老化研究时需引起关注.木柴燃烧排放PM₁₀中的阴阳离子当量比值为0.80±0.11,颗粒物的酸度随颗粒物粒径而改变,亚微米颗粒物和细颗粒物的酸度高于超细颗粒物和粗颗粒物的酸度.本研究对构建生物质燃烧排放分粒径水溶性离子清单,更新和改进相关气候和空气质量模型的参数设置,识别烟气传输过程中的老化具有重要意义.     

Significant emission reductions of carbonaceous aerosols from residential coal burning by a novel stove

Carbonaceous aerosols (CA) are crucial components in the atmospheric PM_2.5 and derived from diverse sources. One of the major sources for CA is from the incomplete combustion of bituminous coal that has been prevailingly used by household stoves in rural areas for heating during winter. To efficiently eliminate the CA emission, a new household stove (NHS) was developed based on a novel combustion technology and CA emissions from the NHS and a traditional household stove (THS) were comparably investigated under the actual stove operation conditions in a farmer's house. Compared with the THS, the emission factors of organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) from the NHS were reduced by 96%±1%, 98%±1%, and 91%±1% under the flaming process and 95%±1%, 96%±2%, and 83%±4% under the smoldering process, respectively. Additionally, the mass absorption efficiency of WSOC from the NHS reduced by 3 folds and the radiative forcing by WSOC relative to EC shrank remarkably by a factor of 3-8. Based on the reduction of emissions and light absorption of WSOC, the promotion of the NHS offers a possible solution to achieve the clean combustion of residential solid fuel.     

Quantification of emission reduction potentials of primary air pollutants from residential solid fuel combustion by adopting cleaner fuels in China

Residential low efficient fuel burning is a major source of many air pollutants produced during incomplete combustions, and household air pollution has been identified as one of the top environmental risk factors. Here we compiled literature-reported emission factors of pollutants including carbon monoxide(CO), total suspended particles(TSPs), PM2.5, organic carbon(OC),elemental carbon(EC) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) for different household energy sources, and quantified the potential for emission reduction by clean fuel adoption. The burning of crop straws, firewood and coal chunks in residential stoves had high emissions per unit fuel mass but lower thermal efficiencies, resulting in high levels of pollution emissions per unit of useful energy, whereas pelletized biofuels and coal briquettes had lower pollutant emissions and higher thermal efficiencies. Briquetting coal may lead to 82%–88% CO, 74%–99%TSP, 73%–76% PM2.5, 64%–98% OC, 92%–99% EC and 80%–83% PAH reductions compared to raw chunk coal. Biomass pelletizing technology would achieve 88%–97% CO, 73%–87% TSP, 79%–88%PM2.5, 94%–96% OC, 91%–99% EC and 63%–96% PAH reduction compared to biomass burning. The adoption of gas fuels(i.e., liquid petroleum gas, natural gas) would achieve significant pollutant reduction, nearly 96% for targeted pollutants. The reduction is related not only to fuel change, but also to the usage of high efficiency stoves.     

天津市大气污染源排放清单的建立

通过调研天津市工、农业生产和居民生活的统计资料,研究分析文献报道的各种污染源排放因子,计算出天津市各行业、各区县NOx、SO2、NMVOC、CO、NH3、PM10、PM2.5等污染物的排放量,发展了天津市2003年排放源清单.结果显示,天津市2003年各类污染物质的排放量NOx为1.77×105t,SO2为2.59 ×105t,NMVOC为2.24×105t,CO为1.33×106t,NH3为7.40×104t,PM10为2.52×105t,PM2.5为1.10×105t.从排放源的行业分布来看,燃煤源、汽车移动源、秸秆燃烧源是天津市大气污染物的重要排放源,燃煤源对各污染物的贡献分别为NOx46%,SO284%,NMVOC 1%,CO 58%,PM1018%,PM2.5 24%.火电、水泥、钢铁、炼焦、原油加工等行业依然是重要的工业污染排放源,火电对SO2的贡献为13%,钢铁对SO2的贡献为24%,对CO的贡献为30%.2003年天津市区对NO,、S02、NMVOC、CO等污染物的贡献均高于其它区县,对PM10、PM2.5的贡献也很高;塘沽区对NOx、SO2、NMVOC、CO等污染物的贡献很大,蓟县、武清区、宝坻区对NH3、PM10、PM2.5的贡献很大.