污染土壤电动修复增强方法研究进展

污染土壤电动修复是一项新兴绿色原位修复技术。其原理是在土壤上施加直流电场，利用电迁移和电渗去除污染物，土壤pH、Zeta电位以及土壤化学性质等因素影响电动修复效果。为了提高修复效率和扩大电动修复应用范围，现在已经发展了针对不同类型土壤和污染物的增强修复技术。本文归纳总结了1995年以来土壤电动修复中常用增强处理效果的8种方法，即酸碱中和法、阳离子选择膜法、电渗析法、络合剂法、表面活性剂法、氧化-还原法、EK-生物联用和Lasagna^TM法，且对每种方法的典型实验装置、增强原理、方法特点和适用范围等进行了分析和讨论，为以后的实验设计提供了有益的参考。     

污染土壤电动修复及供能方式研究进展

污染土壤电动修复是一项新兴的绿色原位修复技术.其原理是在土壤上施加直流电场,利用电迁移和电渗流去除污染物.电动修复的效率主要受到土壤pH、Zeta电位以及土壤化学性质等因素影响.在研究中使用的供能方式有两种控制电位法和控制电流法.这两种供能方式有不同特点和应用范围.控制电压法在理论模型、酸碱增强法以及阳离子膜增强修复方面有着广泛应用;控制电流法在计算目标污染物的迁移数、电渗析修复法以及难溶性重金属污染物的修复中得到应用.     

重金属污染土壤的强化电动修复技术研究进展

在土壤重金属污染日益严重的背景下,寻找一种简单高效的土壤修复技术刻不容缓。电动修复技术由于操作简单、处理污染物多样、修复快速、成本低廉等优点,成为重金属污染土壤修复领域的研究热点。简述了中国土壤重金属污染的现状,电动修复的原理及其影响因素,综述了近年来国内外有关强化电动修复重金属污染土壤的研究进展及国内外应用实例,分析了电动修复技术中存在的问题,最后指明了强化电动修复技术未来的研究方向。     

利用电动技术强化有机污染土壤原位修复研究

电动修复技术是近几年发展起来的一种新型土壤修复技术，由于其处理的高效性受到了越来越多的关注。本文介绍了利用电动技术强化土壤有机污染物原位修复的原理及其最新进展。电动强化有机物污染修复的基本原理是利用电动效应对有机物的迁移作用或者强化生物修复过程（注入营养物、电子受体和活性微生物等）达到去除污染物的目的。研究表明，该技术不破坏生态环境，安装操作简单成本低廉，具有广泛的应用前景，其中电动强化原位生物修复和能够适应于各种不同成分污染（如有机物重金属复合污染）的多技术联合是今后电动技术发展的重要方向。     

几种典型土壤对电动修复镉污染效果的影响

选择5种典型土壤进行了镉污染的电动修复研究。结果表明,经12 d电动修复后,黑土、潮土、红壤、水稻土和黄棕壤中镉的去除率依次为16.7%、21.0%、47.1%、10.7%和12.6%。红壤靠阳极附近Cd含量由初期435 mg·kg-1降至32.4 mg·kg-1,迁移率高达92.5%。黑土、红壤和潮土都维持了较高的电流强度和电渗流量,但由于红壤对碱的缓冲能力较强,修复效果最好。水稻土中电渗流量高,但由于电流低,镉的去除率不高,说明电动修复中电迁移作用强于电渗析。修复后,土壤中可交换态镉、碳酸盐结合态镉、铁锰氧化物结合态镉总量减少,残渣态镉总量增加,有机结合态在阳极附近总量减少、阴极附近总量增加。上述结论揭示了电动修复的土壤镉污染的主要机制,通过镉的运动轨迹和形态分布,可预测不同土壤的电动修复效果,同时能改变不同土壤的电动修复策略,为场地修复提供参考。     

电动力耦合PRB技术修复POPs污染土壤

针对传统电动法修复土壤中持久性有机污染物(POPs)效率较低的问题,研究了电动力耦合渗透性反应墙(PRB)技术以提高污染物去除效率。以菲和2,4,6-三氯苯酚为目标污染物,铁碳混合物作为PRB填料,通过预实验确定了污染物的迁移方向及PRB的设置位置(靠近阴极),探究最佳修复时间和电压梯度下人工配制模拟污染土壤中目标污染物的去除效果。结果表明:菲和2,4,6-三氯苯酚都是随着电渗流从阳极向阴极进行迁移。在电压梯度为1 V·cm~(-1),控制铁碳PRB的pH为4,铁碳质量比为6∶1的条件下,经过15 d的修复,菲总去除率可比传统电动力技术提高69.86%,2,4,6-三氯苯酚总去除率可比传统电动力技术提高71.53%。研究表明,电动力耦合PRB比传统电动力技术有明显的优势,在修复有机污染土壤方面具有良好的发展前景。     

生石灰强化机械通风法修复三氯乙烯污染土壤

机械通风法是一种操作简单、效果好、成本低的土壤修复技术,特别适合大型挥发性有机化合物(VOC)污染场地的土壤修复,但在环境温度低、土壤含水率高、土壤黏性大等情况下,其修复效果和修复周期会受到极大影响,且土壤中高浓度的污染物残留将严重影响场地修复目标的实现。为了解决这一问题,采用了在土壤中添加一定量生石灰的强化措施。结果表明:(1)生石灰可以显著提高机械通风法修复三氯乙烯(TCE)污染土壤的效果,缩短修复周期,降低污染物在土壤中的残留浓度。(2)生石灰对TCE的强化作用与生石灰的添加量和土壤类型有关,粉质黏土的强化效果要好于粉土和细砂,生石灰添加量越多,强化效果越好;(3)生石灰强化处理TCE的主要机制是提高土壤温度、降低土壤含水率、增加土壤通透性,促进土壤中TCE的解吸和挥发。     

铅污染土壤电动修复增强技术的研究

利用电动修复技术对铅污染土壤的修复进行了实验室研究,研究了修复时间和络合剂EDTA对电动修复效果的影响,分析了土壤重金属的迁移和变化特征。结果表明,在电场力作用下随着修复时间的增长污染物的去除率相应提高,去除率由修复时间5 d时的13%增加到15 d时的20%。以EDTA作为阴极控制液,EDTA可与硝酸铅反应形成溶解态的络合物,提高铅离子的移动性,从而提高修复效果。随着EDTA浓度由0.1 mol/L到0.2 mol/L,Pb的去除率由44.4%提高到61.5%,说明添加络合剂可以提高修复效果。另外,电动修复效果与铅的形态分布有密切关系,交换态和碳酸盐结合态有利于重金属铅的去除。     

污染土壤的淋洗法修复研究进展

污染土壤淋洗技术是修复污染土壤的一种新方法 ,是对污染土壤生物修复的一种补充 ,使污染土壤修复的系统化成为可能。淋洗法主要使用淋洗剂清洗土壤 ,使土壤中污染物随淋洗剂流出 ,然后对淋洗剂及土壤进行后续处理 ,从而达到修复污染土壤的目的。因为淋洗剂的种类和淋洗方式的不同 ,土壤淋洗法可分为许多种类。土壤淋洗法主要受土壤条件、污染物类型、淋洗剂的种类和运行方式等因素影响。综合考虑多方面因素 ,就有潜力设计出经济高效的土壤淋洗系统。土壤淋洗法有很多优点 ,尽管也存在一些问题 ,但其技术上的优势也是其他方法难以取代的 ,所以有良好的应用前景。     

电动增强技术修复镉污染土壤及其修复机理

选择小分子有机酸——酒石酸、草酸作为增强试剂,研究在不同浓度小分子有机酸作用下,电动修复土壤重金属镉Cd(Ⅱ)的迁移和去除机制。实验中以胡敏素为吸附剂并将其以包裹的形式添加在在电动装置中,以乙酸-乙酸钠为电解液,同时在两极室之间循环电解液以控制土壤p H值变化。结果表明,电动修复技术促进了重金属的去除。小分子有机酸的加入使弱酸提取态的重金属镉Cd(Ⅱ)的去除率大大提高,可达67.07%。不同浓度的小分子有机酸对电动修复的促进效果不同,随着浓度的持续增加,电动修复效果降低。     

Electrokinetic-enhanced phytoremediation of soils: Status and opportunities

Phytoremediation is a sustainable process in which green plants are used for the removal or elimination of contaminants in soils. Both organic and inorganic contaminants can be removed or degraded by growing plants by several mechanisms, namely phytoaccumulation, phytostabilization, phytodegradation, rhizofiltration and rhizodegradation. Phytoremediation has several advantages: it can be applied in situ over large areas, the cost is low, and the soil does not undergo significant damages. However, the restoration of a contaminated site by phytoremediation requires a long treatment time since the remediation depends on the growth and the biological cycles of the plant. It is only applicable for shallow depths within the reach of the roots, and the remediation efficiency largely depends on the physico-chemical properties of the soil and the bioavailability of the contaminants. The combination of phytoremediation and electrokinetics has been proposed in an attempt to avoid, in part, the limitations of phytoremediation. Basically, the coupled phytoremediation–electrokinetic technology consists of the application of a low intensity electric field to the contaminated soil in the vicinity of growing plants. The electric field may enhance the removal of the contaminants by increasing the bioavailability of the contaminants. Variables that affect the coupled technology are: the use of AC or DC current, voltage level and mode of voltage application (continuous or periodic), soil pH evolution, and the addition of facilitating agents to enhance the mobility and bioavailability of the contaminants. Several technical and practical challenges still remain that must be overcome through future research for successful application of this coupled technology at actual field sites.     

Electrokinetic remediation of organochlorines in soil: enhancement techniques and integration with other remediation technologies

Electrokinetic remediation has been increasingly used in soils and other matrices for numerous contaminants such as inorganic, organic, radionuclides, explosives and their mixtures. Several strategies were tested to improve this technology effectiveness, namely techniques to solubilize contaminants, control soil pH and also couple electrokinetics with other remediation technologies. This review focus in the experimental work carried out in organochlorines soil electroremediation, aiming to systemize useful information to researchers in this field. It is not possible to clearly state what technique is the best, since experimental approaches and targeted contaminants are different. Further research is needed in the application of some of the reviewed techniques. Also a number of technical and environmental issues will require evaluation for full-scale application. Removal efficiencies reported in real contaminated soils are much lower than the ones obtained with spiked kaolinite, showing the influence of other factors like aging of the contamination and adsorption to soil particles, resulting in important challenges when transferring technologies into the field.     

An evaluation of surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil

Soil contamination is notoriously difficult to treat because the contaminants are often tightly bound to the soil particles. Conventional remediation technologies are becoming less popular due to the high treatment costs. This paper gives a comprehensive overview and evaluation of an emerging promising alternative, surfactant foam technology. Different from other approaches, surfactant foam technology may be designed either to remove contaminants or/and simultaneously act as an augmentation for the existing technologies such as pump-and-treat systems and bioremediation processes to improve the contaminant removal efficiency and cost effectiveness. Encouraging results were achieved from laboratory and field demonstrations. However, as an innovative technology, there are many factors to be investigated with the future development. Special attention is paid to the selection of the most appropriate foaming surfactant and surfactant concentration, which are critical to the success of the implementation of the remediation process and have significant effects on the treatment costs. Moreover, development of predictive mathematical models in for future research is helpful to optimize the remediation process.     

土壤、地下水中有机污染物的就地处置

有机化合物对土壤、地下水的污染已引起世界各国的普遍关注.地层介质中的有机物主要以自由态、挥发态、溶解态和固态4种形态存在.有机污染物的自然降解能力较差,如不进行人工清除,在自然环境中它们可能存留长达几十年之久,对土壤、地下水资源构成长期的威胁.传统的开挖处理技术不仅费用昂贵,而且当贮油设施的地表被利用时则无法进行开挖处理(如有建筑物等).近年来,以地下冲洗法、土壤抽水法和地下水曝气法为代表的有机污染物就地处置技术得到了迅速的发展.本文对这3种技术进行概要的介绍,总结指出决定这些技术可能性的主要因素是地层介质的通透能力,有机物的挥发、溶解能力及其可生物降解能力,并列出目前的主要有机污染物挥发、溶解及生物降解能力的相对强弱作为制定具体处置技术的参考指标.     

Establishing and Evaluating the Risk Implications of Uniform Soil Remediation Goals

Abstract

There is growing interest in the establishment of uniform, concentration-based soil remediation goals to accelerate the cleanup of contaminated sites and to provide consistency in the extent of cleanup required for similar sites. If uniform goals are used in a region, post-remediation risk will vary across sites due to regional variability in site properties. Thus far, of the national and state agencies that have established or proposed uniform concentration guidelines, none have quantified the regional variability in risk that is likely to result with their use as remediation goals.

This paper describes a methodology for evaluating regional cancer risk variability resulting from use of uniform, concentration-based soil remediation goals, presents an example application of the methodology, and examines its utility for establishing uniform goals for organic contaminants in soil. The methodology is based on the integrated transport, fate, exposure, and risk model SoilRisk. Also addressed is the issue of contaminants for which regional risk variability is expected to be large with use of uniform soil remediation goals. An approach is described for reducing such variability by development of alternative uniform contaminant concentration levels for categories of sites differentiated by site geographic location or physical-chemical properties.     

植物修复重金属污染土壤的强化措施

植物修复技术作为一种新兴的绿色环保技术,有着高效、经济和生态协调等特点而成为当前研究的热点领域,而且由于其修复的彻底性和环境友好性而在治理污染土壤实地过程得到广泛应用.概述了当前植物修复研究的基本类型和修复机理,并着重从生物技术、农艺措施和物理化学等强化手段上阐述了利用超富集植物修复污染土壤,以进一步提高超富集植物的修复效率,为大规模治理重金属污染土壤和商业化应用提供技术途径和科学依据.     

重金属污染土壤的植物修复技术与其他技术联用的进展与前景

随着工业和经济的发展,土壤重金属污染越来越严重,因此重金属污染土壤的修复迫在眉睫.植物修复技术因其经济、环保等优点已经成为国内外研究的热点,但存在修复植物稀少的问题.将其他技术与植物修复技术联用可能是突破植物修复这一局限性的关键举措之一.介绍了基因工程技术与植物修复技术联用的研究进展;总结了微生物技术与植物修复技术联用...     

Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field

Background, aim, and scope

The use of plants and associated microorganisms to remove, contain, inactivate, or degrade harmful environmental contaminants (generally termed phytoremediation) and to revitalize contaminated sites is gaining more and more attention. In this review, prerequisites for a successful remediation will be discussed. The performance of phytoremediation as an environmental remediation technology indeed depends on several factors including the extent of soil contamination, the availability and accessibility of contaminants for rhizosphere microorganisms and uptake into roots (bioavailability), and the ability of the plant and its associated microorganisms to intercept, absorb, accumulate, and/or degrade the contaminants. The main aim is to provide an overview of existing field experience in Europe concerning the use of plants and their associated microorganisms whether or not combined with amendments for the revitalization or remediation of contaminated soils and undeep groundwater. Contaminations with trace elements (except radionuclides) and organics will be considered. Because remediation with transgenic organisms is largely untested in the field, this topic is not covered in this review. Brief attention will be paid to the economical aspects, use, and processing of the biomass.

Conclusions and perspectives

It is clear that in spite of a growing public and commercial interest and the success of several pilot studies and field scale applications more fundamental research still is needed to better exploit the metabolic diversity of the plants themselves, but also to better understand the complex interactions between contaminants, soil, plant roots, and microorganisms (bacteria and mycorrhiza) in the rhizosphere. Further, more data are still needed to quantify the underlying economics, as a support for public acceptance and last but not least to convince policy makers and stakeholders (who are not very familiar with such techniques).     

突发性场地污染应急控制技术研究进展

随着中国社会经济水平的加速发展,近年来各类突发性场地污染事故频发,如何有效地在第一时间对污染物进行应急控制及场地修复显得尤为重要.以突发性场地污染为研究对象,探讨了土壤及地下水中污染物的应急控制及场地修复技术的研究状况,给出了各项应急控制技术在突发性场地污染事故中适用的目标污染物及土壤类型,以便在实际运用中根据场地的污染类型和土壤性质快速做出响应.最后还指出,应急控制技术作为一种暂时性处理手段,可在场地污染事故发生后对污染物扩散进行快速控制,但不可作为一种长期处置措施.