深圳市商业厨房排放非甲烷碳氢化合物污染特征研究

随着我国餐饮业的快速发展,餐饮源逐渐成为城市大气非甲烷碳氢（NMHCs）的主要来源之一.因此,深入研究餐饮源NMHCs的排放特征是餐饮业科学减排的重要基础.本研究采集了深圳市6类典型餐馆（西式快餐、茶餐厅、职工食堂、湘菜馆、浙菜馆和家常菜馆）排放的NMHCs,并分析了其相应的排放特征、排放因子（EF）、臭氧生成潜势（OFP）和二次有机气溶胶生成潜势（SOAp）.结果显示,6类餐馆排放NMHCs中,茶餐厅、家常菜馆和浙菜馆排放的烷烃浓度最高,而西式快餐和职工食堂排放的烯烃浓度最高,湘菜馆油烟中烷烃和烯烃浓度相近.采用灶台数及用油量作为EF的核算基准,结果显示西式快餐和职工食堂的EF较高.餐饮排放的NMCHs中乙烯、丙烯、1,3-丁二烯、间/对二甲苯、甲苯及癸烷的OFP最高,而环己烷、正庚烷、正辛烷和正癸烷则具有较高的SOA生成潜势.此外,甲苯和苯不仅具有高的O₃生成潜势,还对SOA的生成有明显贡献,是油烟中值得重点关注的污染物.     

餐饮排放有机颗粒物的质量浓度、化学组成及排放因子特征

餐饮废气是大气有机颗粒物的重要排放源.本研究基于模拟实验,研究了烹饪方式、食材以及油品等因素对餐饮废气排放有机颗粒物浓度、组成以及排放因子的影响.结果表明,餐饮排放有机颗粒物的特征受烹饪方式、烹饪食材与烹饪油品等因素影响较大.在所有模拟实验条件下,餐饮废气中可定量的有机颗粒物中,正构烷烃、甾醇和脂肪酸(包括饱和脂肪酸和不饱和脂肪酸)所占的平均质量分数分别为68. 9%、20. 3%和4. 2%,其余的有机物还包括二元羧酸、多环芳烃、单糖以及藿烷类化合物等.有机颗粒物的平均食材排放因子为0. 013 1 g·kg~(-1),变化范围为0. 001 4～0. 027 1 g·kg~(-1).肉类烹饪过程的食材排放因子远大于蔬菜烹饪过程.基于油品的平均排放因子为1. 823 0 g·kg~(-1),变化范围为0. 001 9～10. 173 0 g·kg~(-1).铁架烧烤烹饪方式的油品排放因子大于其他烹饪方式.     

六类餐饮源排放PM2.5化学成分谱

大气颗粒物源成分谱可以表征源排放颗粒物的理化特征,为受体模型开展来源解析研究提供基础数据.餐饮油烟排放是室内外环境大气污染的来源之一,当前餐饮源排放PM_2.5的化学成分谱仍然缺乏.该研究分别在成都市、武汉市和天津市采集了29组6种餐饮源（居民烹饪、火锅店、烧烤店、职工食堂、中餐馆、商场综合餐饮）排放的PM_2.5样品,分析无机元素、离子、碳、多环芳烃（PAHs）等化学组分,并构建了餐饮源排放颗粒物化学成分谱.结果表明:①餐饮源排放PM_2.5化学成分中的主要组分为OC（有机碳）、EC（元素碳）、Ca、Al、Fe、NH₄+、SO₄2-、NO₃-、Na+、K+、Mg2+和Cl-,其中w（OC）最高,为41.67%~57.91%.②餐饮源排放PM_2.5的PAHs中,3环和4环占比较高,其中芴（Flu）、菲（Phe）、荧蒽（Fla）、芘（Pyr）的质量分数相对其他物质较高.研究显示:餐饮源排放PM_2.5中OC/EC约为15.99~67.61,在一定程度上可以用来表征餐饮源排放;Fla/（Fla+Pyr）和InP/（InP+BghiP）多集中在0.45~0.55之间,或可作为标识餐饮源的特征比值.      

北京餐饮源排放细粒子理化特征及其对有机颗粒物的贡献

调研了北京餐饮业发展现状,通过在线监测、采样分析等手段研究北京4家不同烹调方式的餐馆所排放颗粒物的质量浓度、粒径分布、形貌特征、化学组分,并初步估算餐饮源排放细粒子对北京细粒子中颗粒有机物的贡献.结果表明,餐馆的原料、烹饪过程、油烟去除装置以及客流量都会影响餐馆所排放颗粒物的物理、化学性质.样本餐馆营业期间排放颗粒物PM_{2 .5}质量浓度是当日环境大气PM_{2 .5}质量浓度的8～35倍,PM_{1 .0}在PM_{2 .5}的质量浓度中约占50%～85%.餐饮源排放颗粒物多以固态和液态颗粒物形貌存在,化学组分质量百分数由多到少依次是有机物、无机离子和元素碳,分别占到PM_{2 .5}质量浓度的70%左右、5%～11%和小于2%.初步估计结果表明,北京餐饮源排放细粒子对有机颗粒物的贡献和交通源的排放相当,成为北京细粒子有机颗粒物的主要来源之一.认识餐饮源排放颗粒物的理化性质,可以为改善北京空气质量和保证居民身体健康提供数据支持.     

餐饮源油烟中PM2.5的化学组分特征

集中分析了餐饮无组织排放源(街边小吃、火锅店、露天烧烤)及有组织排放源(10家大中型餐馆)油烟PM_2.5中的TC(总碳)、元素组分、离子组分和16种PAHs,得到了各类餐饮源油烟PM_2.5的化学组成特征,建立了餐饮源油烟化学成分谱. 结果表明:各餐饮源油烟的ρ(PM_2.5)是大气背景值的3~42倍,其中露天烧烤油烟的ρ(PM_2.5)最高,达5 659.8 μg/m3. 不同餐饮源油烟的PM_2.5中各化学组分均为w(TC)(38.1%~75.8%)＞w(元素组分)(4.5%~27.0%)＞w(离子组分)(2.7%~22.6%),并且ρ(PM_2.5)与w(TC)呈显著正相关(R=0.84). 菲(PHE)、芘(PYR)、荧蒽(FLT)的质量分数在各类餐饮源油烟的PAHs中均普遍较高,分别为13.8%~21.6%、9.2%~26.5%、6.9%~22.0%.大中型餐馆油烟的PAHs中苯并苝(BPE)的质量分数最高(27.5%),而在其他餐饮源中均小于6.7%;(CHR)的质量分数最低(3.3%),而在其他餐饮源中均大于5.3%. 露天烧烤油烟的PAHs中芘、荧蒽的质量分数分别是其他餐饮源的2.7和2.3倍以上;萘(NAP)的质量分数(0.3%)较小,但在其他餐饮源中均大于11.4%,可以作为特定餐饮源油烟的特征物种.      

深圳市餐饮油烟醛酮类化合物污染特征研究

餐饮业的快速发展加剧了城市大气污染程度.对深圳市粤菜馆、茶餐厅、西餐厅、湘菜馆4种餐馆及职工食堂排放的醛酮类化合物进行采样分析,并研究其组分特征、大气化学反应活性及排放因子.结果表明,职工食堂醛酮类化合物的基准风量排放浓度最高(742.28μg·m~(-3)),茶餐厅最低(30.49μg·m~(-3)).OH消耗速率法(L_(OH))和臭氧生成潜势(OFP)分析结果表明,深圳市总醛酮L_(OH)值和OFP值最大的餐馆均为西餐厅,其值分别为26.20 s~(-1)和1063.41μg·m~(-3).各餐馆排放己醛的L_(OH)贡献率均较高,为13.10%～64.51%.甲醛为O_3生成的关键活性物质,OFP贡献率为9.29%～59.10%.以灶台数、单位时间及用油量为核算基准的排放因子中,职工食堂醛酮排放因子均最大,分别为(0.16±0.03) g·h~(-1)·stove~(-1)、(5.90±0.13) g·h~(-1)和(1.62±0.04) g·kg~(-1);茶餐厅的醛酮排放因子均最小,分别为(0.34±0.02) g·h~(-1)·stove~(-1)、(0.60±0.02) g·h~(-1)和(0.22±0.01) g·kg~(-1).结合研究结果,本研究从源头控制、净化设备的选择及运营维护等方面对深圳市餐饮油烟醛酮控制及减排提出了相关建议.     

厦门城区大气颗粒物PM10中有机酸源谱特征分析

对厦门城区大气颗粒物PM10中有机酸的可能来源,如烹调油烟、生物质燃烧颗粒、汽车尾气和土壤/路面扬尘等4种不同排放源,采用再悬浮混合箱得到PM10样品.采用BF3/正丁醇衍生-GC/MS分析方法,测定了包括二元羧酸、脂肪酸和芳香酸共15种有机酸.结果表明,烹调油烟中有机酸的含量远高于其它颗粒物,最高可达53%,其中亚油酸和油酸的含量最高,为24%±14%;而汽车尾气颗粒物中乙二酸的含量最高,其次为邻苯二甲酸Ph;汽油燃烧颗粒物中己二酸与壬二酸的比值显著高于其它样品,可用于环境大气中二元羧酸的人为和生物来源的定性判断.除发电机排放样品外,其它样品中丙二酸与丁二酸的比值(0.07～0.44)远低于环境样品中该比值范围(0.61～3.93),表明丙二酸与丁二酸的比值可用于环境大气中二元羧酸的一次/二次来源的定性判断.     

广州秋季灰霾污染过程大气颗粒物有机酸的污染特征

收集广州秋季一个灰霾过程大气颗粒物昼夜样品,进行了26种脂肪酸和8种二元羧酸的定量分析(GC/MS).结果表明,大气脂肪酸和二元羧酸的污染水平较高.灰霾与非灰霾期间脂肪酸和二元羧酸浓度之比分别为1.9和2.5.污染上升过程脂肪酸和二元羧酸晚上浓度(653 ng.m-3)高于白天浓度(487 ng.m-3),而在污染降低过程,白天脂肪酸和二元羧酸浓度(412 ng.m-3)要高于晚上浓度(336 ng.m-3).采样期间二元羧酸和脂肪酸日均值浓度总体上与颗粒物和碳质组分的变化趋势一致.脂肪酸和二元羧酸与有机碳比值大体上与颗粒物污染成反比,比值随着大气颗粒物的增加而降低,27号晚上之后,随着颗粒物的降低而开始增加,说明有机酸主要以直接排放为主,而灰霾对有机酸的富集有明显抑制作用.基于特征比值法(C3/C4)及相关性分析,表明秋季灰霾污染过程脂肪酸和二元羧酸都是以一次排放为主.     

传统北京烤鸭烤制过程中大气污染物的排放特征

烤鸭是具有北京特色的传统美食之一,制作过程采用果木炭火烤制方式,与其它食物烹饪过程存在明显的差异,国内还未对这类餐饮源的排放特征进行过系统研究,为掌握这类餐饮源排放特征,从而为污染控制提供技术依据,选取北京市具有代表性的烤鸭店,研究了其烤鸭烤制过程中大气污染物的排放特征.结果表明,传统烤鸭烤制过程中排放的油烟、颗粒物、挥发性有机物(VOCs)和醛酮类化合物的基准排放浓度分别为(0.74±0.45)、(15.32±7.93)、(7.60±3.41)和(1.22±0.59)mg·m~(-3);颗粒物排放浓度要远高于油烟排放浓度,VOCs组分构成相对复杂,既包括烷烃、烯烃、芳香烃等VOCs也包括醛酮类、醇类、酯类等含氧VOCs和卤代烃,其中3-甲基呋喃、乙醇和乙酸甲酯的浓度最高;醛酮类化合物的主要组分有乙醛、甲醛和丙烯醛等,其中C1~C3物质占72.27%.     

北京市餐饮业大气污染物排放特征

餐饮业是中国大型城市大气环境污染源之一.为了解餐饮业大气污染物的产生能力,本研究以北京为研究对象,选取41家不同菜系的餐饮企业,现场实地检测了净化设备前端的油烟、颗粒物和非甲烷总烃(NMHC)的产生浓度水平.结果表明,净化前油烟、颗粒物和NMHC的初始平均浓度约为1.93、 6.6和10.9 mg·m~(-3).提出了一种基于工作日与非工作日的估算污染物排放总量的计算方法.并基于北京市餐饮企业数量和本研究测得的排放因子,初步估算了2019年全市餐饮源主要污染物的初始产生总量,油烟、颗粒物和NMHC的年排放总量分别为5 512、 18 849和6 169 t.川湘菜、烧烤、烤鸭与家常菜产生的油烟与颗粒物浓度的Pearson系数均0.6,具有强相关性;其中川湘菜和烤鸭排放的Pearson系数均0.8,呈现极强相关性.     

上海夏季PM2.5中有机物的组分特征、空间分布和来源

有机物是大气细颗粒物(PM_(2.5))的重要组成部分,其来源和组分非常复杂,是大气科学研究的难点和热点.本研究定量表征了上海地区夏季3个不同功能站点PM_(2.5)中78种有机组分,分析了其组成特征及空间差异,并采用后向轨迹、指示物、特征比值等方法对其来源进行了探讨.结果表明,上海西部郊区青浦和徐汇的有机组分检出浓度相近,约为(317±129)ng·m~(-3),高于东部沿海.78种有机组分中,脂肪酸类物质的占比最高,之后依次为左旋葡聚糖、正构烷烃和多环芳烃,藿烷的占比最低.基于示踪物比值法初步分析结果表明,上海地区的颗粒有机物主要来源于汽油车尾气排放,此外中心城区和西部郊区在观测期间受到了一定程度的生物质燃烧污染,可能与西北方向的污染输送有关.就具体组分而言,在西部郊区青浦,脂肪酸主要来自于陆生植物排放,而在东部沿海地区临港,其还会受到海洋浮游植物和微生物的影响;PAH特征比值的分析表明煤燃烧和机动车尾气对多环芳烃具有重要贡献.相关研究结果有助于对上海有机气溶胶的污染特征及来源的深入认识,为开展颗粒有机物的防治提供一定的基础支撑.     

北京冬季PM2.5中有机气溶胶的化学特征和来源解析

为探讨北京冬季大气细颗粒物（PM_2.5）中有机气溶胶的浓度水平、分布特征和来源变化,对2016年11月10日~12月10日采集的北京大气PM_2.5样品进行气相色谱-质谱测定,定量了129种颗粒有机物（POM）,约占有机物总量的（9.3±1.2）%.其中含量最高的是糖类,仅左旋葡聚糖即可占到定量有机物的18%,其次是正构烷酸、正构烷烃、二元羧酸和多环芳烃.根据POM示踪物的变化特征,分析了供暖和生物质燃烧传输对北京冬季有机气溶胶的影响.相比于非供暖期间,供暖期间化石燃料示踪物藿烷的质量浓度及在有机物中的占比都明显升高,各组分间的分布也更加趋向于燃煤排放的特征.正构烷烃主峰碳数和奇偶分布的变化,反映了化石燃料贡献增强的影响.生物质燃烧示踪物左旋葡聚糖的浓度权重轨迹（CWT）模型结果表明,北京周围区域的秸秆燃烧污染会通过传输影响北京的有机气溶胶组成.利用分子示踪-化学质量平衡（MM-CMB）模型对2016年北京冬季有机碳（OC）进行了来源解析,并与2006年的结果进行比较,以定量10年间各污染来源贡献发生的变化.2016年与2006年相比,机动车对有机气溶胶贡献明显增加,燃煤和木材燃烧的贡献则大幅度降低,餐饮排放的贡献也不容忽视.因此,控制机动车和餐饮源的排放对改善北京冬季PM_2.5污染问题至关重要.     

北京城区和郊区大气细粒子有机物污染特征及来源解析

2004年在定陵、北京大学、奥体中心、良乡、通州共5个采样点采集北京市PM2.5,样品,并对其中有机碳(OC)、元素碳(EC)和有机物组成进行了测定.分析了北京市城区和郊区细粒子中有机化合物的污染特征.共检出有机物188种.主要物种为正构烷烃、正构烷酸、霍烷、多环芳烃、脱氧单糖苷以及其它多种源的示踪物.各监测点有机物浓度均呈现1月浓度最高、10月其次,7月浓度最低,4月居中的特征.市区点(奥体、北大)和近郊点(良乡、通州)的污染物浓度远高于受人为活动影响较小的远郊定陵.以正构烷烃、霍烷、多环芳烃、左旋葡聚糖和EC为示踪物,利用化学质量平衡(CMB)受体模型对北京市PM2.5中的OC进行了来源解析.结果表明,北京市细粒子OC的主要来源为柴油车排放(15.3%)、汽油车排放(20.5%)、燃煤排放(19.0%)、生物质燃烧(2.1%)和植物碎屑(1.1%).机动车和燃煤排放仍然是北京市细粒子OC的主要来源.而且有加重趋势.     

Primary and secondary organic aerosol in an urban/industrial site: Sources, health implications and the role of plastic enriched waste burning

PM10 samples were collected from an urban/industrial site nearby Athens, where uncontrolled burning activities occur. PAHs, monocarboxylic, dicarboxylic, hydroxycarboxylic and aromatic acids, tracers from BVOC oxidation, biomass burning tracers and bisphenol A were determined. PAH, monocarboxylic acids, biomass burning tracers and bisphenol A were increased during autumn/winter, while BSOA tracers, dicarboxylic- and hydroxycarboxylic acids during summer. Regarding aromatic acids, different sources and formation mechanisms were indicated as benzoic, phthalic and trimellitic acids were peaked during summer whereas p-toluic, isophthalic and terephthalic were more abundant during autumn/winter. The Benzo[a]pyrene-equivalent carcinogenic power, carcinogenic and mutagenic activities were calculated showing significant (p < 0.05) increases during the colder months. Palmitic, succinic and malic acids were the most abundant monocarboxylic, dicarboxylic and hydrocarboxylic acids during the entire sampling period. Isoprene oxidation was the most significant contributor to BSOA as the isoprene-SOA compounds were two times more abundant than the pinene-SOA (13.4 ± 12.3 and 6.1 ± 2.9 ng/m³, respectively). Ozone has significant impact on the formation of many studied compounds showing significant correlations with: isoprene-SOA (r = 0.77), hydrocarboxylic acids (r = 0.69), pinene-SOA (r = 0.63),dicarboxylic acids (r = 0.58), and the sum of phthalic, benzoic and trimellitic acids (r = 0.44). PCA demonstrated five factors that could explain sources including plastic enriched waste burning (30.8%), oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids (23.0%), vehicle missions and cooking (9.2%), biomass burning (7.7%) and oxidation of VOCs (5.8%). The results highlight the significant contribution of plastic waste uncontrolled burning to the overall air quality degradation.     

Distribution and sources of solvent extractable organic compounds in PM2:5 during 2007 Chinese Spring Festival in Beijing

The solvent extractable organic compounds (SEOC), including n-alkanes, polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons, fatty acids, anddicarboxylic acids in PM2.5 during the 2007 Chinese Spring Festival in Beijing, were measured via gas chromatography-massspectrometry for determining the characteristics and sources of these organic pollutants. The concentrations of total n-alkanes, PAHs,and organic acids before Chinese Spring Festival Eve (1025.5, 95.9, and 543.3 ng/m3, respectively) were higher than those after (536.6,58...     

Compositions and sources of organic acids in fine particles (PM2.5) over the Pearl River Delta region, south China

Organic acids as important constituents of organic aerosols not only influence the aerosols' hygroscopic property, but also enhance the formation of new particles and secondary organic aerosols. This study reported organic acids including C14–C32fatty acids, C4–C9dicarboxylic acids and aromatic acids in PM2.5collected during winter 2009 at six typical urban, suburban and rural sites in the Pearl River Delta region. Averaged concentrations of C14–C32fatty acids, aromatic acids and C4– C9 dicarboxylic acids were 157, 72.5 and 50.7 ng/m3, respectively. They totally accounted for 1.7% of measured organic carbon. C20–C32fatty acids mainly deriving from higher plant wax showed the highest concentration at the upwind rural site with more vegetation around, while C14–C18fatty acids were more abundant at urban and suburban sites, and dicarboxylic acids and aromatic acids except 1,4-phthalic acid peaked at the downwind rural site. Succinic and azelaic acid were the most abundant among C4–C9dicarboxylic acids, and 1,2-phthalic and 1,4-phthalic acid were dominant aromatic acids. Dicarboxylic acids and aromatic acids exhibited significant mutual correlations except for 1,4-phthalic acid, which was probably primarily emitted from combustion of solid wastes containing polyethylene terephthalate plastics. Spatial patterns and correlations with typical source tracers suggested that C14–C32fatty acids were mainly primary while dicarboxylic and aromatic acids were largely secondary. Principal component analysis resolved six sources including biomass burning, natural higher plant wax, two mixed anthropogenic and two secondary sources; further multiple linear regression revealed their contributions to individual organic acids. It turned out that more than 70% of C14–C18fatty acids were attributed to anthropogenic sources, about 50%–85% of the C20–C32fatty acids were attributed to natural sources, 80%–95% of dicarboxylic acids and 1,2-phthalic acid were secondary in contrast with that 81% of 1,4-phthalic acid was primary.     

Evolution of chemical composition of fogwater in winter in Chengdu, China

Two sampling sites representing the urban and suburban area of Chengdu, China were sampled and analyzed for selected chemicals to characterize the evolution of the chemical composition of fogwater. A trend of total organic carbon (TOC) > total nitrogen (TN) > total inorganic carbon (TIC) was observed for both sites. Variation of inorganic ions indicated that inorganic pollutants were not accumulated in the fog. Concentrations of n-alkanes (C11-C37) at the urban site ranged from 7.58 to 27.75 ng/mL while at the suburban site concentrations were 2.57-21.55 ng/mL. The highest concentration of n-alkanes was observed in the mature period of fog (393.12 ng/mL) which was more than ten times that in the fog formation period (27.83 ng/mL) and the fog dissipation period (14.87 ng/mL). Concentrations of Σ15PAHs were in the range of 7.27-38.52 ng/mL at the urban site and 2.59-22.69 ng/mL at the suburban site. Contents of PAHs in the mature period of fog (27.15 ng/mL) > fog dissipation period (11.59 ng/mL) > fog formation period (6.42 ng/mL). Concentrations of dicarboxylic acids (C5-C9) ranged from 10.92 to 40.78 ng/mL, with glutaric acid (C5) as the dominant dicarboxylic acid. These data provide strong indications of the accumulation of certain organic chemicals of environmental concern in fog and fog water, and provide additional insights about processes in urban and suburban air acting on organic chemicals with similar physical chemical properties.