Sustainable Development and Strategic Thinking

From an economic point of view, the industrial economy is efficient to overcome situations of a scarcity of goods. From a technological point of view, the resource efficiency of the manufacturing processes of the industrial economy has been permanently improved during the last 200 years. In addition, cleaner processes have been developed. However, from an ecologic point of view, an increasing world population with increasing consumption has produced a ＂global footprint＂ which approaches the carrying capacity of the planet. A circular economy and its high-value spin-offs-a lake economy and a performance or functional service economy-can fulfil customers＇ needs with considerably less resource consumption, less environmental impairment in production and considerably less end-of-life product waste, especially in situations of affluence, when a considerable stock of physical goods and infrastructures exists. Also, in situations of a scarcity of natural resources, both energy and materials, often characterised by rapidly rising resource prices, the economic actors of a circular economy have a high competitive advantage over the actors of the industrial economy, due to much lower procurement costs for materials and energy. From a social point of view, a circular economy increases the number of skilled jobs in regional enterprises. However, the shift from a linear manufacturing economy to a circular or service economy means a change in economic thinking from flow （throughput） management to stock （asset） management： in a manufacturing economy with largely unsaturated markets, total wealth increases through accumulation as resource throughput （flow） is transformed into a higher stock of goods of better quality （but in a manufacturing economy with largely saturated markets, wealth represented by the stock of goods will no longer increase）; in a circular or service economy, total wealth increases through a smart management of existing physical assets （stock） that are adapted to changes in both technology and customer demand. This second approach not only applies to physical capital but equally to social capital, such as health and education and green GDP. To measure the social wealth of a population, it is not the amount of money spent on schools and hospitals that matters, butif this expenditure has led to a better education of the students, and a better health of the people.     

中国安全生产科学研究院完成浙江三门核电一期工程职业安全预评价

2008年2月23日，由中国安全生产科学研究院公共安全研究所负责的《浙江三门核电一期工程职业安全预评价报告》评审会由中国核工业集团公司在北京组织召开。     

浙江木材产业可持续发展分析

浙江是一个森林资源稀缺的区域,在面临森林资源稀缺的条件下,浙江木材产业发展却位居全国前列.论文首先从产业规模、产业组织和产业集聚三方面总续了浙江木材产业发展现状及特点;在此基础上,总结了浙江木材产业快速发展过程中面临的主要问题,诸如木材资源供给的不可持续性、木材产业经营成本不断上涨、国际市场与国内市场分割等.问题分析表明,木材资源的短缺已成为浙江木材产业发展的瓶颈,经营成本的上涨影响了浙江木材产业发展的动力,国内外市场分割限制了浙江木材产业的竞争范围,这直接影响到浙江木材产业的可持续发展.现代市场经济发展表明,产业可持续发展需要企业、行业协会以及政府的通力合作.最后,论文分别从企业、行业协会和政府三个层面提出了促进浙江木材产业可持续发展的对策建议.     

组态视角下协同创新驱动城市土地绿色利用效率提升的路径选择北大核心CSCDCSSCI

创新驱动发展战略下协同技术创新是提升城市土地绿色利用效率的重要手段。在理论层面从环境、投入、产出和互动四个维度构建协同创新影响城市土地绿色利用效率的整合性框架后,以中国284个城市为案例,运用模糊集定性比较分析法探讨协同创新驱动城市土地绿色利用效率提升的多元实现路径。研究表明:①单个协同创新条件的一致性水平位于0.4928~0.8388范围内,表明单个条件均不构成影响城市土地绿色利用效率的必要条件。②条件组合的充分性分析显示,创新环境、创新投入、创新产出和协作互动条件“多重并发",形成协同创新驱动城市土地绿色利用效率提升的4种路径,具体归纳为投入主导型、区域互动支撑下的资本赋能型及环境和投入连接下的主体互动转化型3种差异化模式。③条件因素的普适性和替代性分析显示,经济软环境、人力资本投入和物质资本投入是影响高水平城市土地利用效率最具有普遍性的因素,成果市场化和区域互动之间存在替代关系。④囿于各地区经济发展水平和资源稟赋,中国东、中、西部地区协同创新对城市土地绿色利用效率的驱动路径呈现出显著异质性特征。地方政府应根据自身发展特点和资源禀赋,从组态视角着力于多重协同创新条件的适配以“因地制宜"地制定城市土地绿色高效利用政策和措施。     

基于生态融合发展理念的田园综合体发展探析

本文针对我国为乡村振兴所提出的建设田园综合体的重要举措,解析了田园综合体的理论内涵,总结了国内外田园综合体发展历程及我国田园综合体建设过程中存在的顶层规划不合理,乡村生态环境建设不完善,一、二、三产业融合不充分的问题,并从生态融合发展的角度,提出了构建合理生态布局、加强生态环境建设以及实行产业生态化的田园综合体建设路径,以期为我国田园综合体建设提供理论依据和实践经验。     

坚持黄河高质量生态保护，推进流域高质量绿色发展

近年来,过度干预和高强度开发黄河导致的流域生态系统失衡与生态安全威胁问题日渐凸显。本文梳理了黄河从水沙调控与洪水控制、水资源过度开发到建设长治久安幸福河要求的治理变化过程,分析了黄河水与生态系统的关系及存在的重大问题,提出河流治理必须回归到生态系统保护之根本,以生态系统的观点审视和推动黄河高质量保护与流域高质量发展,通过黄河生态功能和水功能保护体系的构建和管理,促进黄河高质量生态保护与流域绿色发展倒逼机制的推进,重点推进黄河"两区一廊道"生态环境功能的系统保护与修复,实施黄河生态流量的保障与监督,强化水资源的生态保护刚性约束与保护。同时,要通过制定黄河流域生态环境法规与补偿政策,实施最严格生态环境监督和流域管理协同创新,强化流域生态环境新技术支撑等措施来强化流域生态环境法规政策与科学技术支撑。