Fluvial fishes face increased imperilment from anthropogenic activities,
but the specific factors contri
buting most to range declines are often poorly understood. For example, the range of the fluvial‐specialist shoal
bass (
Micropterus cataractae) continues to decrease, yet how perceived threats have contri
buted to range loss is largely unknown. We used species distri
bution models to determine which factors contri
buted most to shoal
bass range loss. We estimated a potential distri
bution
based on natural a
biotic factors and a series of currently occupied distri
butions that incorporated varia
bles characterizing land cover, non‐native species, and river fragmentation intensity (no fragmentation, dams only, and dams and large impoundments). We allowed interspecific relationships
between non‐native congeners and shoal
bass to vary across fragmentation intensities. Results from the potential distri
bution model estimated shoal
bass presence throughout much of their native
basin, whereas models of currently occupied distri
bution showed that range loss increased as fragmentation intensified. Response curves from models of currently occupied distri
bution indicated a potential interaction
between fragmentation intensity and the relationship
between shoal
bass and non‐native congeners, wherein non‐natives may
be favored at the highest fragmentation intensity. Response curves also suggested that >100 km of interconnected, free‐flowing stream fragments were necessary to support shoal
bass presence. Model evaluation, including an independent validation, suggested that models had favora
ble predictive and discriminative a
bilities. Similar approaches that use readily availa
ble, diverse, geospatial data sets may deliver insights into the
biology and conservation needs of other fluvial species facing similar threats.
相似文献