产业结构调整和溧阳市城市环境经济协调发展

在良性的城市生态经济系统中，合理的产业结构将会实现环境与经济的协调局长，本文概括亨市的产业结构及环境系统的实际情况，论述了其相互关系，并溧阳市产业结构调整并一进一步进行了讨论。     

辽宁中部城市群大气污染现状及发展趋势分析

根据1987年-2000年辽宁中部城市群(沈阳、鞍山、本溪、抚顺、辽阳)的主要大气污染物(TSP、SO2、NOx)的现状监测值,分析了辽宁中部城市群大气污染的现状及污染程度。分析结果表明：辽宁中部城市群的主要大气污染污染是TSP和SO2;冬季是辽宁中部城市群大气污染最重的季节,夏季大气污染最轻;辽宁中部城市群大气污染最重的城市是本溪,其次是鞍山、沈阳、抚顺、辽阳。     

生态环境监测与生态经济学评价

探讨了荒漠生态环境监测与生态经济学之间的关系,提出荒漠生态环境监测应与生态经济学原则相结合,注意监测人类社会经济活动对生态环境的影响,并根据生态经济学中环境因素的稀缺性、综合性和反馈性等原理对人类开发利用自然资源进行正确评价。     

经济新常态下外贸发展对我国碳排放的影响

选取灵活的单区域模型,运用实物产值比计算方法,选取日本为进口代表国并结合进口国GDP排放强度的修正方法,针对加工贸易产品占我国外贸总额约50%的特点,改进现有内涵排放测算方法.研究结果显示我国出口产品内涵排放得到了显著的改善,呈现碳排放与出口额脱钩的现象,进口产品内涵排放占比全国碳排放的比重维持在3～5%左右,“十二五”期间净出口内涵排放的总量和占比比“十一五”期间都有所降低,显示我国出口贸易政策调整作用正在显现.需要不断坚持优化进出口政策,尽早实现我国进出口产品内涵排放之间的平衡.投资增速的快速下降已经开始对产业结构产生影响,但中国未来需要进一步加速最终消费的增长以弥补投资下降所带来的需求不足,并鼓励服务业需求的发展.     

Circular business models: Babbling initial exploratory

This research aims to map Brazilian companies that have business models aligned with the concept of the circular economy. Data were collected for this study through use of a survey and additional research based on the survey results. Within these businesses’ models, an emphasis on the second use of materials as well as the marketing of the product as a service has been highlighted.     

财政自主能力与碳经济绩效：产业结构升级的中介效应

本文基于1997-2016年中国省级动态面板数据,从产业结构升级视角实证分析了区域财政自主能力作用于碳经济绩效的影响机理。研究发现：产业结构升级在财政自主能力影响碳经济绩效中发挥了中介效应;在高分权地区,财政自主能力能够通过产业结构升级促进碳经济绩效的增长;在低分权地区,财政自主能力会抑制产业结构升级并对碳经济绩效产生不利影响。进一步研究发现,在非农产业占比与非国有企业占比较高的省（区、市）域,财政自主能力能够通过产业结构升级对碳经济绩效产生更强的促进作用。本研究结论能够对地方政府从自身财政自主能力推动产业结构升级,为实现区域经济增长和环境优化的协同发展的政策制定提供理论指导。     

泰州市环境质量与经济的库茨涅兹曲线模拟研究

“环境库茨涅兹曲线”是指经济发展与环境质量之间的“倒U型”曲线关系,即随着经济发展和收入水平的提高,环境质量先恶化后好转。全文基于环境库茨涅兹曲线特征原理,根据泰州市2006年-2015年经济与环境变化的状况,重点分析了泰州市化学需氧量排放量、地表水中高锰酸盐指数、大气污染物二氧化硫排放量、二氧化硫浓度各指标与泰州市经济发展之间的拟合最佳模型。结果表明,前三者与人均GDP的变化规律符合环境库兹涅茨假设。空气中二氧化硫浓度对人均GDP之间的变化规律虽不符合环境库兹涅茨假设,但空气中二氧化硫浓度将呈下降趋势。     

Open workshops as sites of innovative socio-economic practices: approaching urban post-growth by assemblage theory

ABSTRACT

Current debates on knowledge-based and creative locational development have come to deal with small urban places of novelty that formerly remained unnoticed. A plethora of new forms of producing and working recently emerged in unplanned and uncoordinated ways, bearing odd names such as FabLabs, Open Worklabs, RealLabs, Open Design Cities, Techshops, Repair Cafés, and more (Smith, A., M. Fressoli, D. Abrol, E. Arond, and A. Ely. 2017. Grassroots Innovation Movements. London: Routledge). Political initiatives have been taken by surprise; at the same time, standard epistemic tools of the social sciences and economics have been rendered unfit. More concise analytical reconstructions are needed to adequately capture the variety and complexity of these “labs”, their heterogeneous causation, their contingent proceedings, their surplus of latency, their peculiar power relations and their local embeddings. Urban social contexts have a strong triggering function as they help to re-configure older, and create new, combinations of heterogeneous social and economic agency. Meanwhile strong elements of grassroots innovation (Smith et al. 2017) have informed the formation of various models of alternative work and production. Taking the phenotype of open workshops as a revealing example, we take assemblage theory to describe the constitutive features of these new types of self-organised work, and the associated places of innovation. A fresh gaze on the complexity and open-endedness of socio-material formations may help to better understand the nature of emerging post-growth economies.     

Emerging drivers and business models for equipment reuse and remanufacturing in the US: lessons from the biotech industry

While regulations have advanced product take-back in some markets, challenges to increasing product reuse and remanufacturing remain. Most research to date has focused on original equipment manufacturers taking back and remanufacturing their products, which is often problematic. The present study demonstrates that there are emerging opportunities for small companies with innovative business models to enter the market and advance product end-of-life (EoL) management. The paper examines the biotechnology industry – a growing sector with high spending on lab equipment and relatively short lifespans of research and development instruments. Building on previous research and analysis of industry practices and emerging drivers for product reuse and remanufacturing, the authors propose a framework for sustainable EoL management that includes five managerial drivers: financial benefits, space, ease/convenience, information, and sustainability goals. The paper concludes with discussion of the lessons learned and practical implications for managers in charge of purchasing or disposing of surplus equipment.     

Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality

● Anthropogenic circularity science is an emerging interdisciplinary field. ● Anthropogenic circularity was one effective strategy against metal criticality. ● Carbon neutrality is becoming the new industry paradigm around the world. ● Growing circularity could potentially minimize the CO₂ emission. Resource depletion and environmental degradation have fueled a burgeoning discipline of anthropogenic circularity since the 2010s. It generally consists of waste reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, and recovery. Circular economy and “zero-waste” cities are sweeping the globe in their current practices to address the world’s grand concerns linked to resources, the environment, and industry. Meanwhile, metal criticality and carbon neutrality, which have become increasingly popular in recent years, denote the material's feature and state, respectively. The goal of this article is to determine how circularity, criticality, and neutrality are related. Upscale anthropogenic circularity has the potential to expand the metal supply and, as a result, reduce metal criticality. China barely accomplished 15 % of its potential emission reduction by recycling iron, copper, and aluminum. Anthropogenic circularity has a lot of room to achieve a win-win objective, which is to reduce metal criticality while also achieving carbon neutrality in a near closed-loop cycle. Major barriers or challenges for conducting anthropogenic circularity are deriving from the inadequacy of life-cycle insight governance and the emergence of anthropogenic circularity discipline. Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment are the central methodologies to identify the hidden problems. Mineral processing and smelting, as well as end-of-life management, are indicated as critical priority areas for enhancing anthropogenic circularity.