Yolk hormones and sexual conflict over parental investment in the pied flycatcher

Female birds might be able to manipulate the parental effort of their male partner through elevated transfer of hormones to the eggs, since these hormones affect many chick traits that males might use as cues for adjusting the level of their investment. We experimentally studied whether female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca could manipulate male investment via yolk androgens. There is much more variation in yolk androgen levels between females than within clutches, and in order to change the androgen levels of the eggs, we swapped whole clutches between nests. To estimate the androgen levels of the clutch, we measured the androgen content of a single egg per clutch. Females did not succeed in manipulating male effort using yolk androgens, since there was no relationship between the division of parental care within a pair and either original or foster egg androgen levels. One of these relationships should have occurred if females were manipulating males. The proportion of feeding visits by the male was higher when the male was old (55%) than when he was young (45%) and females laid eggs with higher androgen levels when mated with a young male. Young males did not exhibit any responses to yolk androgen levels either, which indicates that females cannot exploit their effort more than that of old males. We suggest that females may allocate yolk androgens to adjust the growth trajectories of the chicks to poor growing conditions when mated with young males that are poor providers or occupying a poor territory.     

Mechanisms of sperm competition in birds: mathematical models

Summary We built models of sperm competition and compared their predictions with observations from domestic chickens in an attempt to elucidate the mechanism of sperm competition. The models suggest that (1) observed levels of precedence of sperm are not merely a passive consequence of the greater mortality of sperm from earlier inseminations; (2) displacement of existing sperm from sperm storage tubules by incoming sperm explains observed levels of sperm precedence and disappearance from the reproductive tract, even in the absence of recognition of sperm from different inseminations; (3) stratification of sperm within the sperm storage tubules fails as an explanation of observed patterns of sperm precedence and disappearance because long-term levels of sperm precedence as high as those observed can only be predicted in combination with rates of disappearance of sperm much lower than those observed in chickens. The predictions of sperm precedence levels following multiple inseminations also suggest that displacement rather than stratification is the most likely mechanism of sperm competition in chickens. We discuss the consequences of male or female control of sperm competition, non-uniform distribution of sperm between sperm storage tubules, and variation in sperm precedence with time after the last insemination, and suggest ways in which the models may be used in future to aid in the elucidation of mechanisms of sperm competition. Offprint requests to: C.M. Lessells