Adsorption and detoxification of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid by montmorillonite clays

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - The co-occurrence of mixtures of glyphosate (GLP) and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in contaminated water, soil, sediment, and plants is a cause...     

CONCENTRATED FLOW BREAKTHROUGHS MOVING THROUGH SILVICULTURAL STREAMSIDE MANAGEMENT ZONES: SOUTHEASTERN PIEDMONT,USA1

ABSTRACT: Geomorphic characteristics and spatial frequency of ephemeral concentrated flow paths entering streamside management zones (SMZs) were evaluated to determine the efficiency of best management practices (BMPs) in preventing concentrated overland flow and associated sediment from reaching stream channels. Specifically, SMZs of 30 recently clearcut and site prepared commercial forestry units in the Georgia Piedmont were surveyed to find two types of locations: those where flow and/or sediment from the adjacent silvicultural site entered and moved through SMZs into stream channels (breakthroughs), and those where either flow and/or sediment entered SMZs without reaching stream channels or where no overland flow entered SMZs (successes). A total of 187 breakthroughs were identified on 3,773 total acres. On average, sites featured one breakthrough for every 20 acres of clearcut or site prepared area. The average hydrologic contributing area to a breakthrough was 1 acre. The percentage of the total clearcut or site prepared area contributing to breakthroughs was 5 percent. Approximately 50 percent of all breakthroughs occurred in areas of convergence (swales) and gullies, while 25 percent of all breakthroughs occurred where runoff from roads or skid trails was concentrated. Breakthroughs tended to occur in areas with large contributing area, low litter cover, and steep slopes. However, individually these variables did not differentiate well between breakthroughs and successes. The variables that discriminated best between successes and failures were the product of contributing area and percent bare ground, and the same variable multiplied by average slope. Fourteen percent of the breakthroughs traveled more than 100 feet through SMZs before reaching streams. Results imply that reduction of bare ground, better dispersal of road runoff, introduction of hydraulic resistance to likely flow paths, and targeted extensions of SMZ width may be warranted in improving BMPs on Piedmont forests.     

AVERAGE DISCHARGE,PERENNIAL FLOW INITIATION,AND CHANNEL INITIATION ‐ SMALL SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASINS1

ABSTRACT: Regional average evapotranspiration estimates developed by water balance techniques are frequently used to estimate average discharge in ungaged streams. However, the lower stream size range for the validity of these techniques has not been explored. Flow records were collected and evaluated for 16 small streams in the Southern Appalachians to test whether the relationship between average discharge and drainage area in streams draining less than 200 acres was consistent with that of larger basins in the size range (> 10 square miles) typically gaged by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). This study was designed to evaluate predictors of average discharge in small ungaged streams for regulatory purposes, since many stream regulations, as well as recommendations for best management practices, are based on measures of stream size, including average discharge. The average discharge/drainage area relationship determined from gages on large streams held true down to the perennial flow initiation point. For the southern Appalachians, basin size corresponding to perennial flow is approximately 19 acres, ranging from 11 to 32 acres. There was a strong linear relationship (R²= 0.85) between average discharge and drainage area for all streams draining between 16 and 200 acres, and the average discharge for these streams was consistent with that predicted by the USGS Unit Area Runoff Map for Georgia. Drainage area was deemed an accurate predictor of average discharge, even in very small streams. Channel morphological features, such as active channel width, cross‐sectional area, and bankfull flow predicted from Manning's equation, were not accurate predictors of average discharge. Monthly baseflow statistics also were poor predictors of average discharge.