北京市地方大气环境标准体系完善研究

大气环境保护标准是控制大气污染的重要手段,为进一步提高北京市大气环境质量,完善北京市大气环境保护标准。在深入研究国家和北京市大气环境标准体系现状的基础上,分析了目前标准体系存在的不足,并提出了体系完善的总体思路。根据北京市大气标准体系现状和北京市经济社会的发展,提出5个需要修订和制订的标准,分别是大气污染物综合排放标准、冶金建材行业及其它工业炉窑大气污染物排放标准、重型汽车整车排放测试试验方法标准、施工场地扬尘排放标准、建筑外墙涂料挥发性有机物含量限制标准。标准体系的完善有利于北京市大气污染的管理控制,具有重大现实意义。     

加拿大森林可持续管理标准和指标评介

介绍了加拿大森林可持续管理标准和指标的产生过程 ,详细介绍了该标准和指标的特点和其中的 6个标准、若干个要素、指标等 ,结合我国的实际分析了该标准和指标对我国可持续森林管理的启示和借鉴作用。     

美国大气污染物排放标准体系综述

介绍了美国大气固定源排放标准的体系、标准内容、标准制定程序与标准实施的有关规定,并分析了其特点。     

中国农产品产地环境标准中存在的问题与对策研究

目前中国已经颁布的各类产地环境类标准已超过30多个(不含地方标准)，与欧美发达国家同类标准相比，中国现行的产地环境类标准普遍存在着制定程序不严谨、相关标准之间衔接统一不够、标准的科学技术水平不高、标准的针对性与实用性不强、标准与分析检验方法不配套等共同的问题。通过实例和数据，对以上问题进行了研究和分析，提出了改革现行的标准管理模式、加强基础性科学研究、借鉴和引进国际先进标准、培育专业技术队伍等对策措施。     

环境保护部“土壤、沉积物、固体废物中有机污染物监测方法标准体系研讨会”在南京召开

为完善国家环保标准体系,做好环境污染物监测方法标准的制订和修订工作,环境保护部科技标准司于2009年3月25—27日在南京召开了“土壤、沉积物、固体废物中有机污染物监测方法标准体系研讨会”。会议由环境保护部南京环境科学研究所承办。目前已确定的26项土壤、沉积物、固体废物中有机污染物监测方法标准制订和修订承担单位的20余名代表参加了会议。     

关于制定我国区域生物多样性中心评价标准的思考

本文针对目前环境保护的热点之一——全球和地区性生物多样性保护,对其中的一个基础理论问题,即区域生物多样性评价标准进行了探索;从理论上对制定这一标准的必要性、可行性、生物多样性的基本内涵、区域生物多样性中心标准的意义及标准制定的原则和依据进行了阐述,并在此基础上提出了我国区域生物多样性中心标准的基本框架。     

臭气浓度标准的制定方法

本文首先介绍了天津市恶臭污染物排放标准中臭气浓度标准制定的程序、方法、步骤及有关参数确定要素。并将天津市的臭气浓度排放标准与日本、美国及我国台湾省的同类标准进行了分析比较。     

水库流域生态补偿标准测算体系研究——以大伙房水库流域为例

生态补偿标准的测算是建立生态补偿机制的核心问题,也是难点所在。研究在对现有生态补偿标准计算方法进行总结分析的基础上,分别从供给方和需求方的角度探索建立了水库流域生态补偿标准测算体系。该体系对基于水库上游水源涵养区生态系统服务功能、生态保护建设总成本和基于下游用水城市意愿支付价格的补偿标准进行了比较分析,最终选择一个既能使水消费者承受得起,又能使生态保护者体会到有所回报的补偿金数额作为上下游协商确定补偿标准的依据。此体系较为全面地对补偿标准进行了测算,使得补偿标准更为公平、合理,进一步完善了水库流域生态补偿标准测算方法。并以大伙房水库流域为例,对其补偿标准进行测算,得出基于研究区生态系统服务功能的补偿标准为64661.3万元,基于研究区生态保护建设总成本的补偿标准为9221.4万元,基于下游用水城市意愿支付价格的补偿标准分别为8637.6万元、12956.4万元,最终认为10000万元是令补偿双方都比较容易接受的一个价格,可作为确定补偿标准的依据。     

加拿大森林可持续管理标准和指标评介

介绍了加拿大森林可持续管理标准和指标的产生过程,详细介绍了该标准和指标的特点和其中的６个标准、若干个要素、指标等,结合我国的实际分析了该标准和指标对我国可持续森林管理的启示和借鉴作用。     

中国城市绿化评价系统比较分析

城市绿化在城市环境建设中起着至关重要的作用。为衡量城市绿化建设的水平和指导城市规划,有必要建立科学的绿化评价体系。分析和比较了中国现有的4种国家级城市绿化评价体系：国家园林城市标准、全国绿化模范城市标准、国家森林城市标准和国家生态园林城市标准,并从易得性、可比性、简易性、客观性等4个方面对具体的指标进行了分析。4种绿化...     

System theory formulation of site-specific water quality standards and protocols

Habitat variability makes site-specific considerations a necessity in the specification of water quality standards. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recognized this in its development of procedures for site-specific modification of national standards. These procedures involves translation of laboratory toxicology data into field situations where such data are often poor predictors of biotoxicity. The whole problem is poorly specified.This paper formulates a system theory approach to better specification of the problems associated with setting water quality standards. A state space model of the general environmental protection problem is presented: Find a set of diagnostic variables whose maintenance within specifiable limits (standards) is both necessary and sufficient to protect all variables of a subject ecosystem. The program for this comprises a site-specific protocol.Stages in such a protocol include (1) choice of diagnostic variables, (2) establishment of necessity and sufficiency for these variables, and (3) determination of standards through (4) toxicity testing. Problems associated with the latter include (a) spatiotemporal variability, system (b) linearity-nonlinearity, and (c) stationarity-nonstationarity, and (d) monitoring for: baseline information, impact detection, determining compliance, establishing causality and making predictions. Each of these problems is structured in terms of the state space model. Then, current procedures of the EPA site-specific methodology are reviewed, and a set of recommendations proposed for their improvement using the system theory formulation to guide further developments.     

Stabilisotopenverdünnungsanalysen zur Quantifizierung organischer Spurenkomponenten in der Lebensmittelanalytik

Background and scope The principle and applications of stable isotope dilution assays (SIDAs) in food analysis is critically reviewed. This method is based on the application of internal standards labelled with stable isotopes. General topics The general section includes historical aspects of SIDAs, the prerequisites and limitations of the use of stable isotopically labelled internal standards along with possible calibrations procedures. The syntheses and availability of labelled food compounds for the use as internal standards is reviewed. Results The complete compensation for losses of analytes during clean-up as well as for ion suppression during LC-MS/MS and the so-called carrier effect are major advantages of SIDAs. However, deficient equilibration, spectral overlap and isotope effects can lead to false results. Discussion With regard to specificity and recovery, SIDAs generally are considered as the reference methods in clinical chemistry. In food chemistry, this method has been applied in flavour and pesticide analysis. However, it is becoming increasingly important also in the analysis of mycotoxins, further contaminants and vitamins. Conclusions The increasing access to isotopologic standards creates continuously new applications for SIDAs, particularly for bioactive compounds in foods.     

Mineralölkohlenwasserstoffe im Boden bei der Sanierung von Altlasten

Various analyses and evaluative procedures are used to provide evidence of success using remediation procedures. Because of the lack of standardized procedures for soil assessment, general practice has unfortunately propagated the use of DIN standards for determining the level of similar parameters in water as well as for other heterogeneous matrices (e.g. in soil). A precise auditing of quality, however, has not been possible with this method, this procedure has even put the success of such a remediation into question. This article describes the problems of determining mineral hydrocarbon concentrations on soil as well as portraying the remediation of oil damages which has occurred on a site of a former waste oil redestillation facility [1, 2]. This procedure has been proved in practice and serves as a model because an adequately defined, standardized method (DIN standard) is lacking.     

Statistical evaluation of the attainment of interim cleanup standards at hazardous waste sites

Cleanup standards at hazardous waste sites include (i) numeric standards (often risk-based), (ii) background standards in which the remediated site is compared with data from a supposedly clean region, and (iii) interim standards in which the remediated site is compared with preremediation data from the same site. The latter are especially appropriate for verifying progress when an innovative, but unproven, technology is used for remediation. Standards of type (i) require one-sample statistical tests, while those of type (ii) and type (iii) call for two-sample tests. This paper considers two-sample tests with an emphasis upon the type (iii) scenario. Both parametric (likelihood ratio) and nonparametric (linear rank) protocols are examined. The methods are illustrated with preremediation data from a site on the National Priorities List. The results indicate that nonparametric procedures can be quite competitive (in terms of power) with distributional modelling provided a near optimal rank test is selected. Suggestions are given for identifying such rank tests. The results also confirm the importance of sound baseline sampling; no amount of post-remediation sampling can overcome baseline deficiencies.This paper has been prepared with partial support from the United States Environmental Protection Agency under a Cooperative Agreement Number CR-815273. The contents have not been subject to Agency review and therefore do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.     

Entwicklung und Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln: Wirtschaftliche Aspekte

The development of new active ingredients and formulations is increasingly influenced by costs and regulations in the frame of pesticide registration procedures. Lawmakers and administrators therefore take over more responsibility, not only for the subject of regulation, but also for fair and balanced rules which can be predicted in the long-term. There are, however, deficiencies in the choice of certain quality standards — like in the European drinking water directive — which are not risk-related and which are susceptible to giving misleading guidance. Testing requirements should be scrutinized for efficiency, i.e. whether the increase in knowledge and safety is in reasonable proportion to the invested resources.     

Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation

The ecological literature reveals considerable confusion about the meaning of validation in the context of simulation models. The confusion arises as much from semantic and philosophical considerations as from the selection of validation procedures. Validation is not a procedure for testing scientific theory or for certifying the ‘truth’ of current scientific understanding, nor is it a required activity of every modelling project. Validation means that a model is acceptable for its intended use because it meets specified performance requirements.Before validation is undertaken, (1) the purpose of the model, (2) the performance criteria, and (3) the model context must be specified. The validation process can be decomposed into several components: (1) operation, (2) theory, and (3) data. Important concepts needed to understand the model evaluation process are verification, calibration, validation, credibility, and qualification. These terms are defined in a limited technical sense applicable to the evaluation of simulation models, and not as general philosophical concepts. Different tests and standards are applied to the operational, theoretical, and data components. The operational and data components can be validated; the theoretical component cannot.The most common problem with ecological and environmental models is failure to state what the validation criteria are. Criteria must be explicitly stated because there are no universal standards for selecting what test procedures or criteria to use for validation. A test based on comparison of simulated versus observed data is generally included whenever possible. Because the objective and subjective components of validation are not mutually exclusive, disagreements over the meaning of validation can only be resolved by establishing a convention.     

The role of primary and secondary air pollutants in atmospheric pollution: Athens urban area as a case study

The question to what extent primary and secondary air pollutants are relevant to atmospheric pollution and their effects on human health and the quality of the environment can be answered in a straight-forward manner: atmospheric processes, including oxidation procedures, particle formation and equilibria, determine the fate of primary emissions and, in most cases, the secondary products of these processes are the more important ones concerning their effects on human health and the quality of the environment. The formation of secondary products represents the critical property determining the establishment of certain air standards, rather than the actually emitted substance, although there are notable exceptions. In this paper, a review concerning transformation of primary pollutants as studied in the atmosphere of Athens is used to enlighten matters that may need further attention by the responsible authorities and stakeholders for the control and reduction of atmospheric pollution.     

Standard purity and response factors of perfluorinated compounds

It has been reported that the relative response factors of isotopically labeled standards and unlabeled standards of the same perfluorinated compounds could be different. Individual (100 ng mL^?1) solutions of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry under negative-ion electrospray to detect any impurities present down to 0.5%–0.1% relative to the major component. Purity of the standards ranged from approximately 86% to ≥ 97%. Standard solutions of unlabeled and isotopically labeled materials were analyzed to compare the response factors of isotopically labeled analytes versus their nonlabeled counterparts in three different matrices at equivalent concentrations: organic solvent (methanol), serum extract, and water present individually and concurrently. Not all labeled analytes have the same response factor as their nonlabeled complement, and in at least one case the matrix in which the standard is present may cause significant suppression of response. Standard solutions of electrochemical fluorination produced PFOA and PFOS were quantified under multiple reaction monitoring mode, using calibration curves prepared from standards consisting primarily of linear standards only. The use of linear only standards may cause under-prediction of concentrations, and that the working range of these standards may be limited.