废水反硝化除氮

反硝化是ＮＯ３＾－在反硝化细菌作用下，经ＮＯ２＾－、ＮＯ、Ｎ２Ｏ被还原为Ｎ２。反硝化对ＮＯ３＾－及有机基质呈零级动力学反应。文章还介绍了生物反硝化的生化反应，反硝化细菌以及基质、温度、溶解氧、ＰＨ对反硝化作用的影响。     

反硝化在土壤及地下水中的净化作用

综述了土壤及地下水系统中反硝化作用的研究进展，详细地介绍了反硝化作用的原理和机制，用以防治地表水和地下水的污染。     

电极-生物膜法反硝化脱氮研究进展

电极 生物膜法是由电化学和生物膜技术相结合而发展起来的一项新型水处理技术 ,在反硝化脱除水中的硝酸盐氮方面具有良好的效果。综述了国内外有关电极 生物膜法反硝化脱氮研究的概况 ,对其基本原理作出探讨 ,并对该法的继续研究作出展望     

城市污水生物脱氮除磷机理研究进展

介绍了生物脱氮、除磷的基本原理，综述了国内上关于城市污水脱氮除磷机理方面的研究现状和进展，并对今后开展这方面的研究提出展望 。     

Nitrogen removal in sequencing batch reactor

ＮｉｔｒｏｇｅｎｒｅｍｏｖａｌｉｎｓｅｑｕｅｎｃｉｎｇｂａｔｃｈｒｅａｃｔｏｒＷａｎｇＦｕｚｈｅｎ；ＰｅｎｇＹｏｎｇｚｈｅｎ；ＹｕＥｒｊｉｅ；ＬｉＢａｉｋｕｎ（ＨａｒｂｉｎＡｒｃｈｉｔｅｃｔｕｒａｌａｎｄＣｉｖｉｌＥｎｇｉｎｅｅｒｉｎｇＩｎｓｔｉｔｕ...     

活性污泥数学模型中异养菌产率系数的测定研究

利用活性污泥数学模型预测污水生物处理系统,首先必须确定其参数和水质组分。采用间歇活性污泥法和呼吸计量法对活性污泥数学模型中异养菌产率系数γ_H进行测定研究。结果表明,间歇活性污泥法测定结果重现性较差,试验控制条件比较严格;呼吸计量法测定结果准确性较高,重现性良好,因而,呼吸计量法是比较可行的γ_H测定方法。     

SBBR同步硝化反硝化处理生活污水的影响因素

序批式生物膜反应器SBBR采用塑料鲍尔环填料,在有氧情况下用于处理实际生活污水.该反应器能很好地创造缺氧微环境,载体生物膜具有吸附储碳能力,出现了良好的同步硝化和反硝化现象.反应器中溶解氧浓度在较大的范围内(0.8～4.0 mg·L-1)能有效地实现同步硝化和反硝化.当溶解氧浓度大于4.0 mg·L-1后,TN容积去除率大幅下降,出水TN大幅上升.增加载体生物膜厚度有利于同步硝化和反硝化.进水浓度基本不影响脱氮的效率,但出水TN随进水浓度增加而升高,建议原水浓度高时可增加后续脱氮处理或减少进水量来满足出水要求.优化运行方法和参数后,SBBR连续运行的TN去除率可稳定在74%～82%.     

生物陶粒流化床-污泥滤层脱氮工艺的试验研究

采用生物陶粒流化床-污泥滤层工艺对含氮有机废水处理进行试验研究,研究结果表明:系统内可固着生长不受抑制的硝化菌种群,氨氮去除率可以达到93%￣95%;三相分离区形成稳定的污泥滤层,可使总氮去除率得以显著提高;当HRT为1.5h,曝气量为0.25m3/h,BOD容积负荷为9.2～10.4BOD5/m3.d,总氮容积负荷0.65kgTN/m3.d条件下,可得到BOD5的去除率85%,总氮去除率74%的处理效果。     

饮用水反硝化脱氮方法研究

为去除饮用水中的硝酸盐氮(NO3ˉ-N)，采用上流式厌氧污泥床(UASB)反应器和固定化微生物进行异养反硝化；自制固定化反硝化菌涂层电极和生物电化学脱氮装置，并用于自养反硝化。试验结果表明。若以甲醇为碳源。当碳氮比(C／N)≥1．o时，室温下经UASB处理4h，NO3ˉ-N去除率为97．7％；若以乙酸为碳源。当C／N≥1．0时，30C下经固定化微生物处理6h，N03ˉ-N去除率为98．6％；在无外加碳源的条件下处理东湖现场水样，30C下经60h后。N03ˉ-N去除率达93．5％。生物电化学脱氮装置可迅速建立自养反硝化菌所需的厌氧环境，水样在室温下经72h处理，脱氮率达96．3％。     

GROUND WATER NITRATE REDUCTION IN GIANT CANE AND FOREST RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES1

ABSTRACT: Ground water contamination by excess nitrate leaching in row‐crop fields is an important issue in intensive agricultural areas of the United States and abroad. Giant cane and forest riparian buffer zones were monitored to determine each cover type's ability to reduce ground water nitrate concentrations. Ground water was sampled at varying distances from the field edge to determine an effective width for maximum nitrate attenuation. Ground water samples were analyzed for nitrate concentrations as well as chloride concentrations, which were used as a conservative ion to assess dilution or concentration effects within the riparian zone. Significant nitrate reductions occurred in both the cane and the forest riparian buffer zones within the first 3.3 m, a relatively narrow width. In this first 3.3 m, the cane and forest buffer reduced ground water nitrate levels by 90 percent and 61 percent, respectively. Approximately 40 percent of the observed 99 percent nitrate reduction over the 10 m cane buffer could be attributed to dilution by upwelling ground water. Neither ground water dilution nor concentration was observed in the forest buffer. The ground water nitrate attenuation capabilities of the cane and forest riparian zones were not statistically different. During the spring, both plant assimilation and denitrification were probably important nitrate loss mechanisms, while in the summer nitrate was more likely lost via denitrification since the water table dropped below the rooting zone.