首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

铁路运输生命周期评价初探
引用本文:杨 洁,王洪涛,周 君.铁路运输生命周期评价初探[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(9):1029-1034.
作者姓名:杨 洁  王洪涛  周 君
作者单位:1.四川大学建筑与环境学院, 四川 成都 610065
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目,四川省环境保护科技计划项目
摘    要:基于生命周期评价方法,建立了我国铁路运输的生命周期模型,包含电力机车和内燃机车的运行、基础设施建设、上游能源和原料生产等主要过程;采用我国2010年铁路货运统计数据、中国生命周期核心数据库(CLCD)等数据源,通过eBalance软件对铁路运输生命周期的环境影响进行了计算和分析. 归一化分析表明,铁路运输生命周期的主要环境影响类型为富营养化、酸化和可吸入无机物,三者分别占全国相应环境影响类型总量的0.92%、0.70%和0.62%. 对大理—保山段铁路实际建设数据的研究表明,铁路基础设施建设及原材料生产的各项环境影响类型对铁路运输生命周期环境影响的贡献在9.45%(富营养化)~73.55%(非能源资源消耗)之间,影响十分显著. 生命周期节能减排综合评价表明,铁路运输节能减排综合指标的主要贡献来自于初级能耗、NOx和CO2,三者分别占ECER(节能减排综合指标值)的30.90%、27.50%和21.60%. 电力机车运输的节能减排效果优于内燃机车运输,其节能减排综合影响比内燃机车低41.91%. 

关 键 词:生命周期评价    铁路运输    基础设施    内燃机车    电力机车    生命周期节能减排评价
收稿时间:2013/1/10 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/4/24 0:00:00

Life Cycle Assessment of Chinese Railway Transportation
YANG Jie,WANG Hong-tao and ZHOU Jun.Life Cycle Assessment of Chinese Railway Transportation[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2013,26(9):1029-1034.
Authors:YANG Jie  WANG Hong-tao and ZHOU Jun
Institution:1.College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China2.School of Management Science and Engineering, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:Railway transportation is an indispensable component in any life cycle assessment (LCA) study and database, however,, full-length LCA of railway transportation was seldom found in China. Following the ISO-LCA method, a life cycle model of Chinese railway transportation for cargo was developed, which included major life cycle processes such as operation of electric and diesel locomotive, construction of railway, production of major energy carriers and materials. Based on Chinese railway statistics data in 2010, Chinese Core Life Cycle Database (CLCD) and relative research papers, the life cycle of Chinese railway transportation for cargo was analyzed in eBalance software. Normalization analysis showed that eutrophication, acidification and respiratory inorganics were the main environmental impact categories of the rail transportation, accounting for 0.92%, 0.70% and 0.62% of the national total amount respectively. According to the analysis based on actual bill of materials of the railway from Dali City to Baoshan City, the life cycle contribution of railway construction ranged from 9.45% (eutrophication) to 73.55% (resource consumption), which was too large to be neglected in LCA study. According to the weighting method based on Chinese energy conservation and emission reduction targets (ECER method), the overall life cycle impact of electric locomotive transportation was lower than diesel locomotive transportation by 41.91%. This indicated that electric locomotive was superior to diesel locomotive. The analysis of life cycle of Chinese railway transportation provided a basis for the further LCA study of railway transportation. Especially, given the significant contribution of railway construction as indicated, more data on railway construction would be needed for LCA studies.
Keywords:life cycle assessment  railway transportation  infrastructure  diesel locomotive  electric locomotive  life cycle energy conservation and emission reduction evaluation method (ECER)
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号