南阳市冬春交替期大气VOCs污染特征及来源解析

近年来我国中部地区臭氧污染问题日益凸显,而挥发性有机物(VOCs)作为近地面臭氧生成的关键前体物,有关其来源研究相较于我国东部地区相对欠缺.为了解我国中部地区VOCs污染特征及其来源,本研究于2017年2—3月在豫鄂陕三省交界处的河南省南阳市南阳理工学院站点开展了为期1个月的VOCs在线监测.测量结果显示,观测期间总VOCs平均浓度为(37.4±18.5)×10~(-9).与国内外已有研究的VOCs测量结果相比,本研究中烷烃、烯烃和炔烃的浓度处于中等偏上水平,而芳香烃浓度则较低.烯烃对臭氧潜势的贡献最高(37%),其次是芳香烃(28%).乙烯、二甲苯、甲苯、丙烯和C4~C5烷烃是最重要的活性组分.利用正交矩阵因子分析(PMF)解析出4个因子,分别是天然气/液化石油气使用+背景、交通排放、溶剂涂料使用和燃煤+生物质燃烧.观测期间南阳理工学院站点对VOCs浓度贡献最高的是燃煤+生物质燃烧因子,平均贡献率为35%,其次是交通排放因子(25%)、天然气/LPG使用+背景(23%)和溶剂涂料使用(17%).研究结果对于认识我国中部地区VOCs来源结构,进而开展VOCs和臭氧防治具有重要意义.     

长沙大气中VOCs研究

应用大气采样罐采样技术和色谱-质谱联用（GC-MS）技术,对2008年长沙市大气中76种挥发性有机物（VOCs）的组分及其质量浓度水平进行测试,比较了各组分对臭氧产生的影响潜势,同时对其主要来源进行简单分析.结果表明,长沙大气总VOCs在上午和下午的浓度分别是38.4×10-9（体积分数）和22.7×10-9（体积分数）,下午大气中VOCs浓度显著低于上午;季节变化呈现VOCs冬季浓度远高于夏季VOCs浓度,组分中以卤代烃最高,烷烃、芳烃次之,烯烃最低,OH消耗速率最高的物质是间、对二甲苯（10.71×10-9 C,碳单位体积比,下同）;其次为1,2,4-三甲苯（6.04×10-9 C）和1,3,5-三甲苯（2.23×10-9 C）.芳烃对大气O3生成贡献最大（66%）,其次是烯烃（26%）,烷烃最低（8%）.高浓度的异戊烷和丙烷说明了机动车排放和液化石油气是VOCs来源之一,苯/甲苯的特征比值接近0.8,远高于机动车尾气排放特征比值0.5;说明溶剂和涂料挥发是其主要来源之一.     

东莞工业集中区夏季臭氧污染与非污染期间VOCs组分特征及其来源

为探讨东莞典型工业区夏季大气挥发性有机物（VOCs）污染特征及来源,于2020年夏季在厚街镇对大气环境中56种VOCs开展了在线观测,并同步收集了臭氧（O₃）、氮氧化物（NO_x）和一氧化碳（CO）等气体污染物浓度和气象因子等资料,在此基础上分析了VOCs总体积分数和主要物种体积分数特征,进一步估算了主要VOCs物种对臭氧生成潜势的贡献和不同臭氧浓度下VOCs的主要污染源贡献率.结果表明,观测期间56种VOCs的体积分数平均值为53.1×10^-9,其中φ（芳香烃）、φ（烷烃）、φ（烯烃）和φ（炔烃）分别为24.7×10^-9、23.7×10^-9、3.9×10^-9和0.7×10^-9.与非臭氧污染期间相比,臭氧污染期间φ（芳香烃）、φ（烷烃）、φ（烯烃）和φ（炔烃）分别上升约10%、43%、38%和98%.无论是臭氧污染还是非臭氧污染期间,芳香烃对臭氧生成潜势的贡献率均最大,其次为烷烃、烯烃和炔烃.整个夏季观测期间,溶剂源、液化石油气泄漏、化石燃料燃烧源和油气挥发源对VOCs的贡献率分别为60%±20%、16%±11%、15%±11%和9%±6%;臭氧污染期间,溶剂源的贡献率下降到44%,而液化石油气泄漏和油气挥发源的贡献率分别上升到21%和16%.     

Observation and analysis of atmospheric volatile organic compounds in a typical petrochemical area in Yangtze River Delta, China

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are a kind of important precursors for ozone photochemical formation. In this study, VOCs were measured from November 5th, 2013 to January 6th, 2014 at the Second Jinshan Industrial Area, Shanghai, China. The results showed that the measured VOCs were dominated by alkanes (41.8%), followed by aromatics (20.1%), alkenes (17.9%), and halo-hydrocarbons (12.5%). The daily trend of the VOC concentration showed a bimodal feature due to the rush-hour traffic in the morning and at nightfall. Based on the VOC concentration, a receptor model of Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) coupled with the information related to VOC sources was applied to identify the major VOC emissions. The result showed five major VOC sources: solvent use and industrial processes were responsible for about 30% of the ambient VOCs, followed by rubber chemical industrial emissions (23%), refinery and petrochemical industrial emissions (21%), fuel evaporations (13%) and vehicular emissions (13%). The contribution of generalized industrial emissions was about 74% and significantly higher than that made by vehicle exhaust. Using a propylene-equivalent method, alkenes displayed the highest concentration, followed by aromatics and alkanes. Based on a maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) method, the average hourly ozone formation potential (OFP) of VOCs is 220.49?ppbv. The most significant source for ozone chemical formation was identified to be rubber chemical industrial emissions, following one by vehicular emission. The data shown herein may provide useful information to develop effective VOC pollution control strategies in industrialized area.     

Significant contribution of spring northwest transport to volatile organic compounds in Beijing

High values of ozone (O₃) occur frequently in the dry spring season; thus, understanding the evolution characteristics of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in spring is of great significance for preventing O₃ pollution. In this study, a total of 101 VOCs from April 16 to May 21, 2019, were quantified using an online gas chromatography mass spectrometer/flame ionization detector (GCMS/FID). The results indicated that the observed concentration of total VOCs (TVOCs) was 30.4 ± 17.0 ppbv, and it was dominated by alkanes (44.3%), followed by oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) (17.4%), halocarbons (12.7%), aromatics (9.5%), alkenes (8.2%), acetylene (5.3%) and carbon disulfide (2.5%). The average mixing ratio of VOCs showed obvious diurnal variation (high at night, low during daytime). We conducted a source apportionment study based on 32 major VOCs using positive matrix factorization (PMF), and coal + biomass burning (25.2%), diesel exhaust (16.0%), gasoline exhaust + evaporation (17.4%), secondary + long-lived species (16.7%), biogenic sources (4.3%), industrial emissions (9.3%) and solvent use (11.2%) were identified as major sources of VOCs. In addition to local emissions, most of the atmospheric VOCs were derived from long-distance air masses (65.7%), and the average mixing ratio of VOCs in the northwest direction was 29.4 ppbv. Combined with the results of the potential source contribution function (PSCF) indicate that research should focus on the local emissions of combustion, transportation sources and solvents usage to control atmospheric VOCs. Additionally, transmission of the northwest air mass is an important component that cannot be ignored during spring in Beijing.     

重庆主城区夏秋季挥发性有机物（VOCs）浓度特征及来源研究

利用在线GC-MS/FID,对重庆主城区2015年夏、秋季大气挥发性有机物(VOCs)开展了为期1个月的观测.结果发现,监测期间主城区总挥发性有机物(TVOCs)体积分数为41.35×10-9,烷烃占比最大,其次是烯炔烃、芳香烃和含氧性挥发性有机物(OVOCs),卤代烃占比最小.将本次研究结果同以往研究结果比较发现,高乙炔浓度可能受交通源排放的影响,而乙烯和乙烷浓度的大幅度降低则得益于主城区化工企业的大举搬迁.通过最大增量反应活性(MIR)估算VOCs的臭氧生成潜势(OFP)发现,芳香烃(32.1%)和烯烃(30.6%)对臭氧生成的贡献最为显著,其中以乙烯、乙醛和间/对二甲苯的OFP最强,因此,对烯烃和芳香烃的削减能有效控制大气中O3的生成.通过PMF模型共解析出5个因子,主要为生物源及二次生成、其他交通源、天然气交通源、溶剂源和工业源.从5个因子对VOCs的贡献百分比可以看出,重庆城区交通源贡献最大(50.4%),其次是工业源和溶剂源的贡献(30%),生物源及二次生成的贡献最小.     

上甸子区域背景站VOCs污染特征及其对臭氧生成贡献

大气中的挥发性有机物(volatile organic compounds,VOCs)作为对流层臭氧和二次有机气溶胶的前体物,在光化学反应和细颗粒物污染中发挥着重要的作用.本研究于2017年9月1～27日在上甸子区域背景站开展VOCs的连续在线观测,对VOCs的浓度水平,时空变化特征,化学反应活性及其对臭氧生成的贡献进行了研究,并运用特征物种比值法对初始VOCs的来源进行了分析.结果表明, 2017年9月上甸子站总VOCs平均体积分数为12.53×10~(-9),其中,烷烃是体积分数最大的组分,占到了总VOCs的65.3%,其次是烯烃和芳香烃,分别占到了总VOCs的26.7%和6.5%.从大气化学活性来看,上甸子站总的L~(·OH)(·OH损耗率)为5.2 s~(-1),其中C4～C5烯烃占到了61%,其次是C2～C3烯烃,占到了12.8%.VOCs的臭氧生成潜势平均值为36.5×10~(-9),烯烃是贡献最大的组分,占到了71.2%.烯烃中又以C4～C5烯烃的贡献最为突出,而体积分数较大的烷烃对臭氧生成的贡献却不大.对特征物种的比值研究发现,上甸子站VOCs受生物质燃烧和燃煤排放的影响较大,除此之外,交通排放源也有一定的影响,完全不受工业排放源的影响.     

重庆市主城区O3污染时期大气VOCs污染特征及来源解析

2020年8月底至9月初,重庆市主城区发生了持续时间近2周的O₃污染过程.期间,在主城区3个观测站点利用苏玛罐和DNPH采样柱采集的环境空气VOCs样品,研究了O₃污染期间VOCs组分特征、光化学反应活性及来源解析.结果表明,观测期间重庆市主城区TVOCs平均体积分数为45.08×10^-9,各组分体积分数排序依次为OVOCs、烷烃、卤代烃、烯烃、芳香烃和炔烃.体积分数较高的VOCs物种是甲醛、乙烯和丙酮,三者之和占比TVOCs超过30%.OVOCs和烯烃对· OH消耗速率（L_i^·OH）和臭氧生成潜势（OFP）均具有较大的贡献,是生成O₃的关键VOCs组分;其中,OVOCs组分中主要的活性物种为甲醛、乙醛和丙烯醛,烯烃组分中主要的活性物种为异戊二烯、乙烯和正丁烯.VOCs中二甲苯与乙苯的比值较低,并且两者呈现显著的相关性,表明主城区大气中VOCs气团老化程度高,同时还受到其他区域远距离传输的影响.PMF受体模型解析结果显示,主要有5种VOCs来源,依次为二次生成源（27.67%）、机动车尾气源（26.56%）、工业排放源（17.86%）、植物源（14.51%）和化石燃料燃烧源（13.4%）.     

Characteristics of ozone and ozone precursors (VOCs and NOx) around a petroleum refinery in Beijing, China

A field measurement campaign for ozone and ozone precursors(VOCs and NOx) was conducted in summer 2011 around a petroleum refinery in the Beijing rural region. Three observation sites were arranged, one at southwest of the refinery as the background, and two at northeast of the refinery as the downwind receptors. Monitoring data revealed the presence of serious surface O3 pollution with the characteristics of high average daily mean and maximum concentrations(64.0 and 145.4 ppbV in no-rain days, respectively) and multi-peak diurnal variation. For NOx, the average hourly concentrations of NO2 and NO were in the range of 20.5–46.1 and 1.8–6.4 ppbV, respectively. For VOC measurement, a total of 51 compounds were detected. Normally, TVOCs at the background site was only dozens of ppbC, while TVOCs at the downwind sites reached several hundreds of ppbC. By subtracting the VOC concentrations at background, chemical profiles of VOC emission from the refinery were obtained, mainly including alkanes(60.0% ± 4.3%), alkenes(21.1% ± 5.5%) and aromatics(18.9% ± 3.9%). Moreover, some differences in chemical profiles for the same measurement hours were observed between the downwind sites; the volume ratios of alkanes with low reactivity and those of alkenes with high reactivity respectively showed an increasing trend and a decreasing trend. Finally, based on temporal and spatial variations of VOC mixing ratios, their photochemical degradations and dispersion degradations were estimated to be 0.15–0.27 and 0.42–0.62, respectively, by the photochemical age calculation method, indicating stronger photochemical reactions around the refinery.     

三亚市大气VOCs污染特征、臭氧生成潜势及来源解析

为探究热带地区环境空气中挥发性有机物(VOCs)的污染特征,利用三亚市2019年VOCs在线监测数据,全面分析了VOCs的污染特征、来源以及对O₃的影响.结果表明:①总挥发性有机物(TVOCs)日均体积分数范围为2.05×10-9~19.74×10-9,且以烷烃(71.4%)和烯烃(20.5%)为主.②VOCs优势物种丙烷、正丁烷、乙烷、异丁烷、乙烯、乙炔、苯和甲苯的体积分数日变化均呈早晚双峰的特征;φ(异戊二烯)呈白天显著高于夜间的特征,其季节性变化规律与光照变化基本一致.③对臭氧生成潜势(OFP)贡献最大的是烯烃(70.6%),其中异戊二烯的OFP贡献率(41.9%)最大,其次是烷烃(19.9%).④春夏季φ(NO₂)和φ(VOCs)均较低,难以通过光化学反应生成较高的φ(O₃),秋冬季φ(O₃)显著升高主要与东北方向污染物传输有关.⑤正交矩阵因子模型(PMF)解析结果表明,VOCs来源分别为交通源(46.52%)、溶剂使用源(18.25%)、植物源(12.36%)、工业源(11.99%)和燃烧源(10.88%).研究显示,三亚市环境空气中φ(VOCs)受交通源排放影响较大,应加强管制以削减环境空气中VOCs活性较大的物种,从而减少O₃的生成.      

Temporal variations and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds at an urban site in Shijiazhuang, China

Shijiazhuang, the city with the worst air quality in China, is suffering from severe ozone pollution in summer. As the key precursors of ozone generation, it is necessary to control the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) pollution. To have a better understanding of the pollution status and source contribution, the concentrations of 117 ambient VOCs were analyzed from April to August 2018 in an urban site in Shijiazhuang. Results showed that the monthly average concentration of total VOCs was 66.27 ppbv, in which, the oxygenated VOCs (37.89%), alkanes (33.89%), and halogenated hydrocarbons (13.31%) were the main composite on. Eight major sources were identified using Positive Matrix Factorization modeling with an accurate VOCs emission inventory as inter-complementary methods revealed that the petrochemical industry (26.24%), other industrial sources (15.19%), and traffic source (12.24%) were the major sources for ambient VOCs in Shijiazhuang. The spatial distributions of major industrial activities emissions were identified by using geographic information statistics system, which illustrated the VOCs was mainly from the north and southeast of Shijiazhuang. The inverse trajectory analysis using Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) and Potential Source Contribution Function (PSCF) clearly demonstrated the features of pollutant transport to Shijiazhuang. These findings can provide references for local governments regarding control strategies to reduce VOCs emissions.     

上海市城区VOCs的年变化特征及其关键活性组分

2010年在上海市城区开展了为期一年的连续观测,采用自动在线GC-FID方法定量测试了大气中56个VOCs物种的浓度.结果发现,上海市城区大气VOCs的全年小时体积分数为(2.47~301.48)×10^-9,平均体积分数为(26.45±23.36)×10^-9,其中,烷烃占46.72%,芳香烃占33.18%,烯烃占11.33%,乙炔占8.76%.T/B(甲苯/苯)为3.51±2.40,表明气团除受机动车影响外,受溶剂、油气和LPG挥发等其他VOCs排放的影响也比较突出;E/E(乙烷/乙炔)为0.98±0.68,表明气团存在老化现象,且春冬季节气团光化学年龄相对较短,夏秋季节光化学年龄相对较长.VOCs的浓度水平和组成在不同风向风速影响下存在一定差异,西南部石化和化工企业排放的VOCs对城区的影响明显,其主要物种为芳香烃和烯烃;该地区气团的OH消耗速率常数(K^OH)为8.05×10^-12 cm³·分子^-1·s^-1,平均VOCs最大O₃增量反应活性(4.00 mol·mol^-1)与乙烯相当,平均反应活性较强;对OH消耗速率(L^OH)贡献率最大的是烯烃(42.21%)和芳香烃(40.83%),对臭氧生成潜势(OFP)贡献率最大的是芳香烃(62.75%)和烯烃(21.70%),VOCs的关键活性组分是二甲苯、甲苯、乙苯、乙烯、丙烯、反-2-丁烯及异戊二烯.     

Chemical speciation and anthropogenic sources of ambient volatile organic compounds(VOCs)during summer in Beijing,2004

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured at six sites in Beijing in August, 2004. Up to 148 VOC species, including C₃ to C₁₂ alkanes, C₃ to C₁₁ alkenes, C₆ to C₁₂ aromatics, and halogenated hydrocarbons, were quantified. Although the concentrations differed at the sites, the chemical compositions were similar, except for the Tongzhou site where aromatics were significantly high in the air. Based on the source profiles measured from previous studies, the source apportionment of ambient VOCs was preformed by deploying the chemical mass balance (CMB) model. The results show that urban VOCs are predominant from mobile source emissions, which contribute more than 50% of the VOCs (in mass concentrations) to ambient air at most sites. Other important sources are gasoline evaporation, painting, and solvents. The exception is at the Tongzhou site where vehicle exhaust, painting, and solvents have about equal contribution, around 35% of the ambient VOC concentration. As the receptor model is not valid for deriving the sources of reactive species, such as isoprene and 1,3-butadiene, other methodologies need to be further explored.     

黄冈市大气挥发性有机物污染特征、来源及对臭氧生成的影响

基于黄冈市城区大气挥发性有机物（VOCs）离线采样数据和常规空气污染物、气象在线监测数据,分析了黄冈市大气VOC组分和体积分数特征,并利用正交矩阵因子分解（PMF）模型和耦合MCM机制的光化学反应箱式模型（PBM-MCM）分别分析了臭氧（O₃）污染高发期VOCs的来源及臭氧生成敏感性.结果表明,φ（TVOCs）平均值为（21.57±3.13）×10^-9,且呈现出冬春高、夏秋低的季节性特征,其中烷烃（49.9%）和烯烃（16.4%）的占比最大.PMF解析结果显示黄冈市大气VOCs主要来源为：燃料燃烧源（27.8%）、机动车排放源（19.9%）、溶剂使用源（15.7%）、工业卤代烃排放源（12.1%）、化工企业排放源（10.5%）、自然源（7.8%）和柴油车排放源（6.2%）.在人为源中,溶剂使用、燃料燃烧和化工企业排放的VOCs对大气环境中O₃生成的贡献较大,贡献了O₃生成的60.9%,故对O₃污染防控应优先管控这3种人为源.通过相对增量反应性（RIR）和经验动力学方法（EKMA）曲线分析,观测期间黄冈市O₃生成处于VOCs控制区,且间/对-二甲苯、乙烯、1-丁烯和甲苯等VOCs对O₃生成比较敏感,应重点削减以上VOCs的排放.     

太原市夏季大气VOCs污染特征及臭氧生成潜势

2018年8月采集太原市大气样品,分析太原市夏季大气VOCs的污染特征,并利用最大增量反应活性系数法（MIR系数法）估算了VOCs的臭氧生成潜势（OFP）.结果表明,太原市夏季大气VOCs浓度为17.36~89.60μg/m³,其中烷烃占比58.01%、芳香烃占比20.06%、烯烃占比16.52%、炔烃占比5.40%.大气VOCs浓度变化表现为明显的早晚双高峰特征,且以早高峰影响为主.OFP分析显示,烷烃、烯烃、芳香烃、炔烃分别占总OFP的19.16%、47.74%、31.75%、1.35%,C₃~C₅类烯烃是活性较高的物种,对O₃生成贡献较大.     

2020年成都市典型臭氧污染过程特征及敏感性

2020年4月24日至5月6日成都市臭氧(O3)和细颗粒物(PM2.5)复合污染过程期间,在成都市城区开展大气臭氧及其前体物(NO,、VOCs)和气象参数观测实验,基于观测数据采用OBM模型对市区臭氧敏感性和主控因子进行识别,并采用PMF模型对关键VOCs物种进行来源解析.结果表明,臭氧超标日各污染物浓度均有所上升,VOCs物种中芳香烃和含氧(氮)化合物上升幅度较大;成都市城区O3超标天对应的臭氧处于显著VOCs控制区,芳香烃和烯烃对O3生成最为敏感,且存在削减NOx的不利效应;结合VOCs来源解析,城区VOCs主要来源:移动源(22.4％)、餐饮及生物质燃烧源(21.8％)、工业源(15.1％)和溶剂使用源(9.3％),臭氧超标天溶剂使用源、餐饮及生物质类燃烧源贡献率明显上升.成都市城区春季应以VOCs减排为重点,并加大芳香烃和烯烃相关源控制力度.     

廊坊开发区8~9月O3污染过程VOCs污染特征及来源分析

使用ZF-PKU-1007大气挥发性有机物（VOCs）在线连续监测系统,于2018年8月25日至9月30日在廊坊开发区对99种VOCs进行监测,并开展不同O₃污染情况下ω（VOCs）特征、大气反应活性及来源研究.结果表明,监测期间廊坊开发区ω（VOCs）平均为（75.17±38.67）×10^-9,O₃污染日和清洁日ω（VOCs）平均分别为（112.33±30.96）×10^-9和（66.25±34.84）×10^-9,污染日ω（VOCs）较清洁日偏高69.6%;对于大气反应活性,污染日和清洁日VOCs对臭氧生成潜势（OFP）的贡献均以醛酮类、芳香烃、烯烃和烷烃为主,对于羟基消耗速率（L_·OH）,污染日以芳香烃（30.0%）和烯烃（25.8%）为主,而清洁日烯烃贡献（29.8%）略高于芳香烃（28.0%）;PMF源解析结果显示,机动车排放（34.4%）、溶剂使用及挥发源（31.7%）、石化工业源（15.7%）、燃烧源（11.1%）和植物排放源（7.9%）为监测期间VOCs的主要来源,另外污染日溶剂使用及挥发源、植物源排放较清洁日升高13.1%和1.2%,可能与污染日温度较高有关.因此,机动车排放和溶剂使用及挥发为廊坊开发区8~9月VOCs的控制重点.     

郑州市VOCs组分排放清单及其臭氧生成潜势

基于人为源挥发性有机物（VOCs）活动水平统计和源成分谱梳理,采用排放因子法,建立了郑州市2016年VOCs组分排放清单,评估了各类源臭氧生成潜势（OFP）.结果表明,2016年郑州市人为源VOCs排放总量为96215.3 t,排放量最高的是道路移动源（29.7%）,其次是有机溶剂使用源（28.1%）;排放量最高的组分是烷烃（29.8%）,其次是芳香烃（29.0%）.郑州市人为源VOCs的OFP为341291.0 t,贡献最高的排放源是道路移动源（30.5%）,其次是溶剂使用源（28.8%）,其中轻型汽油车、内墙涂料使用、机动车表面涂层、加油站装卸油和非金属矿物制造是OFP的主要次级排放源,也是郑州市降低臭氧污染时需重点管控的VOCs排放源.对于VOCs种类而言,贡献较高的是芳香烃（42.8%）,其次是烯烃（38.9%）,未来应加强对间/对-二甲苯、丙烯和乙烯等物种排放来源的控制.     

移动源排放VOCs特征及臭氧生成潜势研究—以兰州市为例

高浓度近地面臭氧(O_3)污染是国内外许多城市面临的大气污染问题,且近年来O_3浓度呈逐渐升高的趋势.随着城市规模日益扩大,移动源成为VOCs的主要排放源之一,对移动源的O_3生成潜势进行评估,并识别其关键物种和重点污染区域,可为城市O_3控制对策的制定提供科学依据.本文以兰州市移动源为例,结合排放系数、交通流量及相关统计数据,建立兰州市VOCs移动源排放清单,并使用最大增量反应活性(MIR)估算移动源VOCs的臭氧生成潜势(OFP).结果表明,兰州市汽油车是移动源中最主要的OFP贡献源类,占移动源的71.12%;烯烃和芳香烃为移动源总OFP主要的贡献者,主要贡献物种为:乙烯、丙烯、甲醛、3-甲基-1-丁烯、甲苯、正丁烯、乙炔、间二甲苯、1,2,4-三甲基苯、邻二甲苯,这10个物种的OFP占移动源总OFP的67.29%;根据兰州市移动源VOCs排放的OFP贡献空间分布结果,移动源VOCs排放的重点控制区域为城关区和七里河区.     

上海市青浦区大气挥发性有机化合物的特征

在2012年11~12月和2014年5~10月对上海市青浦区大气中58个VOCs物种进行了连续监测.结果表明,青浦区VOCs总体浓度水平较低,烷烃是其中含量最高的物种,百分含量为41.64%,其次为芳香烃25.66%、烯烃15.21%、乙炔7.71%.总VOCs的月变化特征表现为11月最高,10月最低;日变化特征表现为明显的双峰分布.通过OH消耗速率和臭氧生成潜势(OFP)计算,评估了VOCs的化学反应活性.结果表明,上海市青浦区大气VOCs的化学反应活性较强,且与VOCs浓度具有良好的一致性.OH消耗速率贡献最大的物种是烯烃56.92%和芳香烃45.24%,OFP贡献最大的物种是烯烃29.19%和芳香烃40.82%;对臭氧生成贡献最大的关键活性物种是乙烯、异戊二烯、甲苯、间/对二甲苯及丙烯等物质.利用化学质量平衡(CMB)模型分析了VOCs的来源,结果显示,上海市青浦区大气中VOCs主要有6个来源,分别是汽车尾气排放、LPG泄漏、涂料和溶剂挥发、植物排放、生物质燃烧、工业排放,其贡献率分别为43%、5%、16%、3%、14%、7%.